大模型
marktechpost.com ·
@Sana Hassan
OpenBMB发布MiniCPM5-2B:2.52B稠密模型,平均53.9分,支持端侧运行
OpenBMB发布MiniCPM5-2B,2.52B参数,原生131K上下文,34项基准平均53.9,超越Qwen3.5-4B。后训练结合400B tokens深度思考SFT和RL,合并16个专家模型。Apache 2.0开源,提供GGUF格式,兼容主流推理框架。
AI推荐理由 OpenBMB发布MiniCPM5-2B模型,提供具体参数、基准分数和开源细节,信息密度高,对开发者有实际价值。
85
正文
编辑精选
代理式AI
科技新闻
AI论文摘要
技术
AI简讯
人工智能
应用
语言模型
大语言模型
机器学习
新发布
员工
OpenBMB发布了MiniCPM5-2B,这是MiniCPM5系列中的第二个检查点,也是MiniCPM5-1B的后续版本。它是一个密集因果语言模型,拥有2,516,756,480个参数,其中1,981,982,720个位于嵌入之外。它使用42层,分组查询注意力,16个查询头和2个键/值头,原生上下文窗口为131,072个标记。架构是标准的LlamaForCausalLM,因此主流引擎无需自定义内核或模型代码分支即可加载。
它是否可部署?是的。权重采用Apache 2.0许可,可通过vLLM、SGLang、Transformers、llama.cpp、Ollama、LM Studio、MLX和FlagOS运行。
基准表实际显示的内容
OpenBMB将MiniCPM5-2B与同尺寸类别的LFM2.5-2.6B、Qwen3.5-2B和Gemma-4-E2B-it进行比较,并列出Qwen3.5-4B、granite-4.2-3B、Nemotron-3-Nano-4B、Gemma-4-E4B-it和LFM2.5-8B-A1B作为参考。在34个基准行中,它平均得分为53.9。该组中最佳基线是Qwen3.5-4B,得分为51.1,其次是granite-4.2-3B,得分为42.7,LFM2.5-2.6B得分为33.2。
在代码推理方面,MiniCPM5-2B在LiveCodeBench v6上得分为69.1,而基线为56.4;在SWE-bench Verified上得分为46.4,而基线为33.6。工具使用差距最大:τ²-Bench Telecom上得分为97.1,BFCL v4上得分为66.6,τ³-Bench Banking上得分为20.8,而基线为6.8。长上下文表现不一,NoLiMa上得分为68.1,而基线为43.5,但AA-LCR上得分为59.0,而基线为61.0,LongBench v2上得分为43.7,而基线为47.3。通用知识是尺寸差距显现的地方:MMLU-Pro上得分为70.8,而基线为78.0;Humanity's Last Exam上得分为8.9,而基线为9.9。OpenBMB将来自Artificial Analysis的行与内部复现的行分开标记。
训练方案:SFT,然后RL,然后在线策略蒸馏
训练遵循原始研究中描述的UltraData分层数据管理方法。基础训练运行稳定和衰减阶段,然后中期训练使模型适应目标数据分布。后训练从400B标记的深度思考SFT开始,然后使用基于评论家的JustRL II算法为数学、代码、代理任务和写作训练专门的RL教师。
最后一步是在线策略蒸馏。OPD将16个RL专家(其中5个是代理式的)合并到一个发布的模型中。在每个响应位置,它计算学生和教师logits之间的全词汇反向KL散度作为优势估计,取代基于验证的优势。它重用RL提示作为蒸馏数据,因此无需构建新语料库。OpenBMB衡量RL加OPD阶段在推理和通用基准上平均提高10.96分,在代理基准上提高6.96分。
数据也是开放的
除了权重,OpenBMB还发布了Ultra-FineWeb、Ultra-FineWeb-L3、UltraX、UltraData-Code、UltraData-Math、UltraData-SFT-2605、UltraData-SFT-Agent-2609(包含500K代理样本)和UltraData-RL-2609(包含超过80K RL样本)。中间检查点也已发布,涵盖Base、Midtrain和仅SFT,因此每个阶段的贡献可以直接衡量。
总结
MiniCPM5-2B是代理和工具调用工作负载的可信设备端选项,而不是通用知识模型。其优势在工具使用、编码代理和NoLiMa风格的长上下文检索方面最为明显,在MMLU-Pro、GPQA-Diamond和MATH-500上落后于更大的模型。开放的数据和中间检查点使RL加OPD的主张可验证,这比标题平均分更重要。
关键要点
2.52B密集模型,131,072标记上下文,Apache 2.0,标准Llama架构。
在34个基准上平均得分53.9,领先于Qwen3.5-4B的51.1。
在工具使用、编码代理和长上下文检索方面最强;在知识方面最弱。
后训练将400B SFT标记与RL教师和在线策略蒸馏相结合。
预训练、SFT和RL数据集随权重一起发布。
在此处查看HF、GitHub仓库和网页。另外,请随时在Twitter上关注我们,别忘了加入我们的150k+ML SubReddit并订阅我们的新闻通讯。等等!你在telegram上吗?现在你也可以在telegram上加入我们。
需要与我们合作推广你的GitHub仓库或Hugging Face页面或产品发布或网络研讨会等?联系我们
Sana Hassan
+ 文章简介
Sana Hassan是Marktechpost的咨询实习生,也是印度理工学院马德拉斯分校的双学位学生,热衷于应用技术和AI解决现实世界挑战。他对解决实际问题有浓厚兴趣,为AI与现实解决方案的交汇带来了新视角。
Sana Hassan
使用NVIDIA Earth2Studio构建自定义批量集成天气预报
Sana Hassan
从计算机模拟到湿实验室:评估AI蛋白质设计性能
Sana Hassan
使用Python中的LabPlot进行科学数据分析:信号处理、光谱峰值拟合、可视化和批处理自动化
Sana Hassan
使用deepDoctection构建端到端文档智能流水线
查看原文(中文正文为 AI 翻译)
Editors Pick
Agentic AI
Tech News
AI Paper Summary
Technology
AI Shorts
Artificial Intelligence
Applications
Language Model
Large Language Model
Machine Learning
New Releases
Staff
OpenBMB has released MiniCPM5-2B, the second checkpoint in the MiniCPM5 series and the follow-up to MiniCPM5-1B. It is a dense causal language model with 2,516,756,480 parameters, of which 1,981,982,720 sit outside the embeddings. It uses 42 layers, grouped-query attention with 16 query heads and 2 key/value heads, and a native context window of 131,072 tokens. The architecture is standard LlamaForCausalLM, so mainstream engines load it with no custom kernels and no model-code fork.
Is it deployable? Yes. The weights are Apache 2.0 and run through vLLM, SGLang, Transformers, llama.cpp, Ollama, LM Studio, MLX and FlagOS.
What the benchmark table actually shows
OpenBMB compares MiniCPM5-2B against LFM2.5-2.6B, Qwen3.5-2B and Gemma-4-E2B-it in the same size class, and lists Qwen3.5-4B, granite-4.2-3B, Nemotron-3-Nano-4B, Gemma-4-E4B-it and LFM2.5-8B-A1B for reference. Across 34 benchmark rows it averages 53.9. The best baseline in that set is Qwen3.5-4B at 51.1, then granite-4.2-3B at 42.7 and LFM2.5-2.6B at 33.2.
On code reasoning MiniCPM5-2B posts 69.1 on LiveCodeBench v6 against 56.4, and 46.4 on SWE-bench Verified against 33.6. Tool use is the widest margin: 97.1 on τ²-Bench Telecom, 66.6 on BFCL v4, and 20.8 on τ³-Bench Banking against 6.8. Long context is split, with 68.1 on NoLiMa against 43.5, but 59.0 on AA-LCR against 61.0 and 43.7 on LongBench v2 against 47.3. General knowledge is where the size gap shows: 70.8 on MMLU-Pro against 78.0, and 8.9 on Humanity’s Last Exam against 9.9. OpenBMB marks rows sourced from Artificial Analysis separately from internally reproduced ones.
Training recipe: SFT, then RL, then on-policy distillation
Training follows the UltraData tiered data management method described in original research. Base training runs stable and decay phases, then mid-training adapts the model to the target data distribution. Post-training starts with 400B tokens of deep-thinking SFT, then trains specialised RL teachers for math, code, agentic tasks and writing using the critic-based JustRL II algorithm.
The final step is on-policy distillation. OPD merges 16 RL experts, five of them agentic, into a single shipped model. At each response position it computes full-vocabulary reverse KL divergence between student and teacher logits as the advantage estimate, replacing the verification-based advantage. It reuses the RL prompts as distillation data, so no new corpus is built. OpenBMB measures the RL plus OPD stage at 10.96 average points on reasoning and general benchmarks and 6.96 points on agentic ones.
The data is open too
Alongside the weights, OpenBMB released Ultra-FineWeb, Ultra-FineWeb-L3, UltraX, UltraData-Code, UltraData-Math, UltraData-SFT-2605, UltraData-SFT-Agent-2609 with 500K agent samples, and UltraData-RL-2609 with more than 80K RL samples. Intermediate checkpoints are published as well, covering Base, Midtrain and SFT-only, so the contribution of each stage can be measured directly.
Summary
MiniCPM5-2B is a credible on-device option for agentic and tool-calling workloads, not a general knowledge model. Its advantage is clearest on tool use, coding agents and NoLiMa-style long-context retrieval, and it trails larger models on MMLU-Pro, GPQA-Diamond and MATH-500. The open data and intermediate checkpoints make the RL plus OPD claim checkable, which matters more than the headline average.
Key Takeaways
2.52B dense model, 131,072 token context, Apache 2.0, standard Llama architecture.
Averages 53.9 across 34 benchmarks, ahead of Qwen3.5-4B at 51.1.
Strongest on tool use, coding agents and long-context retrieval; weakest on knowledge.
Post-training pairs 400B SFT tokens with RL teachers and on-policy distillation.
Pre-training, SFT and RL datasets ship alongside the weights.
Check out the HF, GitHub repo and Web. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 150k+ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter. Wait! are you on telegram? now you can join us on telegram as well.
Need to partner with us for promoting your GitHub Repo OR Hugging Face Page OR Product Release OR Webinar etc.? Connect with us
Sana Hassan
+ postsBio
Sana Hassan, a consulting intern at Marktechpost and dual-degree student at IIT Madras, is passionate about applying technology and AI to address real-world challenges. With a keen interest in solving practical problems, he brings a fresh perspective to the intersection of AI and real-life solutions.
Sana Hassan
Building Custom Batched Ensemble Weather Forecasting with NVIDIA Earth2Studio
Sana Hassan
From In-Silico to Wet-Lab: Evaluating AI Protein Design Performance
Sana Hassan
Scientific Data Analysis with LabPlot in Python: Signal Processing, Spectral Peak Fitting, Visualization, and Batch Automation
Sana Hassan
Building an End-to-End Document Intelligence Pipeline with deepDoctection