最新资讯
dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 bloomberg.com AI 抛售蔓延至信用市场,软银领跌亚洲美元债 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露 dev.to 你的 Agent Harness 应具备的 17 项能力 dev.to 离线 AI 记忆中 0.8 余弦阈值为何失效 dev.to Kimi K3.1 Pro 开放权重:自托管 2.8T 模型前的开发者清单
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

AI 代理的信息聚合

原文 我的收藏

arXiv 论文《Information Aggregation with AI Agents》(econ.GN,交叉 cs.AI/cs.GT,作者 Spyros Galanis,v4 修订于 2026-09-25)。研究通过受控实验让 LLM 代理在预测市场中依据私有信号交易,覆盖四种复杂度递增的信息结构。结果显示:简单结构下市场中位数能有效聚合信息,但需要超过两层交互推理的困难结构下表现恶化,接近人类受试者的推理天花板;廉价谈话沟通、改变市场时长、策略性提示均未提升市场准确率;初始价格平均影响很小,仅在极难结构中起作用;能力更强的代理聚合更好且更盈利,但提供历史表现反馈并未改善聚合。三个月后用能力前沿模型复跑,三种较易结构聚合更频繁,最难结构仍未改善,只是从'自信地错误'转为在 0.5 附近对冲。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 经济学论文(econ.GN,交叉 cs.AI/cs.GT),作者 Spyros Galanis,v4 修订版。核心新信息:受控实验让 LLM 代理在预测市场中接收私有信号并交易,测试四种复杂度递增的信息结构;发现简单结构下市场中位数能有效聚合信息,但需要超过两层交互推理的困难结构下性能下降,接近人类受试者的天花板;廉价谈话沟通、延长市场时长、策略性提示均未提升准确率;能力更强的代理聚合更好且更盈利,但反馈历史表现无帮助;三个月后用能力前沿模型复跑,三种较易结构聚合更频繁,最难结构仍失败,只是从'自信地错误'变为'在 0.5 附近对冲'。局限:仅摘要与元数据,无正文细节,实验规模、模型版本、样本量未提供,结论需以原文为准。

78

正文

Economics > General Economics arXiv:2604.20050 (econ) [Submitted on 21 Apr 2026 (v1), last revised 25 Sep 2026 (this version, v4)] Title:Information Aggregation with AI Agents Authors:Spyros Galanis View a PDF of the paper titled Information Aggregation with AI Agents, by Spyros Galanis View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Can Large Language Models (AI agents) aggregate dispersed private information through trading and reason about the knowledge of others by observing price movements? We conduct a controlled experiment where AI agents trade in a prediction market after receiving private signals, across four information structures of increasing complexity. We find that although the median market is effective at aggregating information in the easy information structures, performance deteriorates in the harder structures, suggesting that AI agents struggle in environments where more than two levels of interactive reasoning are required, a ceiling close to the one documented in human subjects. Consistent with our theoretical predictions, market accuracy does not improve from allowing cheap talk communication, changing the duration of the market, or strategic prompting; initial price has little average effect but matters in the very hard structure. We also find that ``smarter'' AI agents perform better at aggregation and are more profitable. Surprisingly, giving them feedback about past performance does not improve aggregation. A further wave of markets, run three months later with capability-frontier models, aggregates information more often in the three easier structures but not in the hardest one, where higher capability replaces markets that are confidently wrong with markets that hedge near 0.5. Comments: Subjects: General Economics (econ.GN); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT) Cite as: arXiv:2604.20050 [econ.GN] (or arXiv:2604.20050v4 [econ.GN] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.20050 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Spyros Galanis Dr [view email] [v1] Tue, 21 Apr 2026 23:17:24 UTC (901 KB) [v2] Thu, 7 May 2026 14:26:43 UTC (898 KB) [v3] Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:41:57 UTC (901 KB) [v4] Fri, 25 Sep 2026 11:24:10 UTC (501 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Information Aggregation with AI Agents, by Spyros Galanis View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: econ.GN new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.GT econ q-fin q-fin.EC References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

aihot::arXiv - LLM AI 代理的信息聚合 09-28 · 原文发布
← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容