最新资讯
reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 bloomberg.com AI 抛售蔓延至信用市场,软银领跌亚洲美元债 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露
多元动态
登录 注册
论文研究 arxiv.org ·

微观协作投毒:一种针对 RAG 系统的分布式攻击

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 Micro-Collaborative Poisoning,将虚假目标声明分散到多篇局部可信文档中,而非集中在单一恶意段落。作者在 108 种 RAG 配置下评估,改变数据集、检索器架构、检索深度、数据库组成、投毒数据库数量和生成模型。结果显示攻击效果来自检索来源中弱对抗信号的累积,而非单一主导段落;提高 top-k 和投毒多个数据库会增加这些信号同时出现的概率,而干净数据库的多样性和更强的检索器可降低其影响。文档级投毒可见性分析表明,该攻击比直接投毒留下更弱的显式投毒特征,难以通过孤立文档检查发现。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,作者与摘要明确,实验覆盖 108 种 RAG 配置,提出并验证了一种分布式投毒攻击:将虚假目标声明拆分到多篇局部可信文档中,靠弱对抗信号累积影响下游输出。新信息在于攻击不依赖单一恶意段落,且文档级检测难以暴露;局限是仅摘要层面,未提供代码或复现细节,结论为预印本阶段。

78

正文

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security arXiv:2609.21573 (cs) [Submitted on 18 Sep 2026] Title:Micro-Collaborative Poisoning: A Distributed Attack on RAG Systems Authors:Pedro Pereira, Eva Maia, Isabel Praça View a PDF of the paper titled Micro-Collaborative Poisoning: A Distributed Attack on RAG Systems, by Pedro Pereira and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves large language models by grounding outputs in external knowledge sources, but this dependency also creates a surface for poisoning attacks. This paper introduces Micro-Collaborative Poisoning, a distributed attack in which a false target claim is divided across multiple locally plausible documents instead of being concentrated in a single malicious passage. We evaluate the attack across 108 RAG configurations by varying dataset, retriever architecture, retrieval depth, database composition, number of poisoned databases, and generator model. The results indicate that Micro-Collaborative Poisoning is not driven by a single dominant poisoned passage, but by the accumulation of weak adversarial signals across retrieved sources. Increasing top-$k$ and poisoning multiple databases make it more likely that these signals will appear together in the retrieved context, while clean database diversity and stronger retrievers can reduce their influence. The document-level poisoning visibility analysis further shows that this threat is difficult to expose through isolated document inspection, since Micro-Collaborative Poisoning achieves downstream influence while leaving a weaker explicit poisoning signature than direct poisoning. Comments: Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.21573 [cs.CR] (or arXiv:2609.21573v1 [cs.CR] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21573 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Pedro Pereira [view email] [v1] Fri, 18 Sep 2026 10:03:33 UTC (398 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Micro-Collaborative Poisoning: A Distributed Attack on RAG Systems, by Pedro Pereira and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CR new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容