最新资讯
stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

机制设计还不够:面向合作式AI的亲社会智能体

原文 我的收藏

该论文从不完全契约理论出发,形式化证明当契约无法区分所有相关未来情形时,存在任何现实机制都无法消除的严格正福利损失,因此仅靠机制设计不足以最大化 LLM 智能体的社会福利。作者提出让智能体在权衡自身福利时也考虑他人福利的“亲社会”方案,并在多智能体资源分配环境和经典社会困境实验中表明亲社会性有益。结论指向:要实现大规模合作式交互,除设计机制外,还需让智能体本身具备内在亲社会性。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 正式论文(v3,2026-09-22 修订),作者含 Bernhard Schölkopf、Zhijing Jin 等,来源可信、摘要信息密度高。核心新信息:借助不完全契约理论形式化证明,当契约无法区分所有相关未来情形时,任何现实机制都无法消除严格为正的福利损失;并提出亲社会(prosocial)智能体可弥补该缺口,在多智能体资源分配与经典社会困境实验中显示亲社会性有益。局限:结论基于形式化假设与特定实验环境,摘要未给出具体实验规模与量化结果,实际可扩展性待验证。

78

正文

Computer Science > Computer Science and Game Theory arXiv:2605.08426 (cs) [Submitted on 8 May 2026 (v1), last revised 22 Sep 2026 (this version, v3)] Title:Mechanism Design Is Not Enough: Prosocial Agents for Cooperative AI Authors:Xuanqiang Angelo Huang, Charlie Tharas, Samuele Marro, Van Q. Truong, Bernhard Schölkopf, Emanuele La Malfa, Zhijing Jin View a PDF of the paper titled Mechanism Design Is Not Enough: Prosocial Agents for Cooperative AI, by Xuanqiang Angelo Huang and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Ensuring that AI agents behave safely and beneficially when interacting with other parties has emerged as one of the central challenges of modern AI safety. While mechanism design, as the theory of designing rules to align individual and collective objectives, can incentivize cooperative behavior, it is still an open question whether it alone is sufficient to maximize LLM agents' social welfare. This work proves that the answer is negative: drawing from incomplete contract theory, we formally show that when contracts cannot distinguish all relevant future contingencies, there is a strictly positive welfare loss that no realistic mechanism can eliminate. We show that prosocial agents, who weigh others' welfare alongside their own, can close this gap and achieve outcomes that are socially superior and individually beneficial. Experimentally, we show that in multi-agent resource-allocation environments and canonical social dilemmas where agents are powered by large language models, prosociality is beneficial. The implication for AI safety is clear: to enable cooperative interactions at scale, designing adequate mechanisms is not sufficient; agents must be built to be intrinsically prosocial. Comments: Subjects: Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2605.08426 [cs.GT] (or arXiv:2605.08426v3 [cs.GT] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.08426 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Xuanqiang 'Angelo' Huang [view email] [v1] Fri, 8 May 2026 19:37:07 UTC (3,121 KB) [v2] Tue, 2 Jun 2026 11:37:31 UTC (3,121 KB) [v3] Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:24:36 UTC (3,121 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Mechanism Design Is Not Enough: Prosocial Agents for Cooperative AI, by Xuanqiang Angelo Huang and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.GT new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容