陶哲轩：数学的未来

Domain: terrytao.wordpress.com Points: 37 | Comments: 7 [Top Comments] - What do you expect from Avigad, who works on Lean? Tao is herding the sheep into the AI enclosure with a stream of AI-positive guest posts. There are no concerns about being funded by a small number of rich AI-boosting foundations, no concerns that intuition and radical new thoughts might be impeded by staring into a glowing rectangle all day and only some concerns about job losses. It is all very well for the directors and the tenured, who apparently hope they can solve a major problem with AI while avoiding hard work. - > [mathematics] being funded by a small number of rich [people] Historically this has always been the case. Rich people or people supported by rich people did math, while peasants worked the fields and workers worked in factories/mines/etc. This is just regression toward the mean. - >Can every interesting mathematical question be answered that way? Probably not, and even questions that can may have more interesting and satisfying solutions that invoke novel ideas and insights. Perhaps, in the near future, AI systems will be able to come up with such insights, but, at the very least, let’s recognize that we are not there yet. This keeps being repeated by AI skeptics, yet AI keeps solving more and more complex tasks. We've reached the point that it's even started solving Millennium problems. >Telling us that some AI agent is spinning out theorems that are highly interesting to it and other AI agents does nothing for us. This is the future of pushing the frontier though. AIs need to be pushed to get better and better. AI understanding of math is millions times more important than human's. - Tasks are not simply integer “difficulties” where, if your “intelligence” exceeds the “difficulty” then you will solve it. The question is to what extent AI will affect creation of new branches and elegant ideas in mathematics. This question applies to every area. Has it created an interesting new way of thought in any area other than those where massive tree search can be mistaken for such? I don’t think it’s impossible but the evidence doesn’t point clearly to it. - Math as a field is unbounded. There's always more to discover, new systems to invent, new problems to find. It's not just some predefined set of unsolved problems. Math is also a matter of what is both interesting and useful to humans. For some reason there is this virulent strain of anti-human AI rhetoric that machines will replace us. But what is the purpose of math as a field of study if we're not in the loop? - > This keeps being repeated by AI skeptics, And now you're hearing it from a guy who's one of the foremost, early proponents of AI in math. > AI understanding of math is millions times more important than human's. Important to whom? - Maybe the next frontier for AI is to make it more pedagogical. If the aim of mathematics is to promote greater human understanding, then surely elevating everyone’s grasp and appreciation of math is of greater import than chasing another theorem feather for our hats - especially if AI can automate the plucking.