最新资讯
reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 bloomberg.com AI 抛售蔓延至信用市场,软银领跌亚洲美元债 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露
多元动态
登录 注册
论文研究 arxiv.org ·

EAGER:通过可验证奖励强化学习增强生成式事件抽取

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 论文提出 EAGER,一个面向生成式事件抽取的强化学习框架,将细粒度可验证奖励与 Schema-Contrastive Advantage Estimation 结合,以缓解稀疏二值奖励下的优势坍缩。奖励设计针对结构有效性、抽取准确率、groundedness、覆盖率、过度生成和跨度精度。作者称在七个基准数据集上持续优于提示、监督微调及此前的强化学习基线,但摘要未给出具体指标与代码信息。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 新提交论文(2026-09-24),提出 EAGER 强化学习框架用于生成式事件抽取,结合细粒度可验证奖励与 Schema-Contrastive Advantage Estimation 以缓解稀疏二值奖励下的优势坍缩,并在七个基准数据集上报告优于提示、监督微调和既有 RL 基线。新信息在于奖励设计覆盖结构有效性、抽取准确率、groundedness、覆盖率、过度生成和跨度精度,属于方法层面的具体贡献;局限是仅有摘要,未提供具体指标数值、消融细节或代码,效果无法独立核验。

72

正文

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2609.29230 (cs) [Submitted on 24 Sep 2026] Title:EAGER: Enhancing Generative Event Extraction via Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Authors:Omar Adjali, Siting Liang, Omair Shahzad Bhatti, Daniel Sonntag View a PDF of the paper titled EAGER: Enhancing Generative Event Extraction via Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards, by Omar Adjali and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:End-to-end event extraction remains challenging for large language models as it requires simultaneous identification of event triggers, classification of event types, and extraction of schema-grounded argument spans. We present EAGER, a reinforcement learning framework for generative event extraction that combines fine-grained verifiable rewards with Schema-Contrastive Advantage Estimation to alleviate advantage collapse under sparse binary rewards. Our reward design explicitly targets structural validity, extraction accuracy, groundedness, coverage, over-generation, and span precision. Experiments across seven benchmark datasets show that EAGER consistently outperforms prompting, supervised fine-tuning, and prior reinforcement learning baselines, achieving a substantial improvement over the strongest prior method. Results demonstrate that task-aligned verifiable rewards and contrastive advantage estimation substantially improve structured extraction. Comments: Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2609.29230 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.29230v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.29230 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Omar Adjali [view email] [v1] Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:37:46 UTC (747 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled EAGER: Enhancing Generative Event Extraction via Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards, by Omar Adjali and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容