大模型
arxiv.org ·
利用知识图谱和大语言模型生成有趣的科学想法:与100位研究组负责人的评估
论文提出 SciMuse,基于 5800 万篇论文的知识图谱与 LLM 生成个性化科研想法,并邀请 100 余位研究组负责人对 4400 多个想法按兴趣度评分。结果显示专家评分整体不高(5 分制均值 2.40,众数为 1),仅 24.9% 获 4 或 5 分;用知识图谱选出的概念对并未优于仅给标题的 GPT 基线,高被引预测概念对甚至略低于随机概念对(1.94σ)。作者进一步用图特征的监督网络和 LLM 零样本排序预测想法兴趣度,为难以量化的“科学有趣性”提供了大规模跨学科专家评估数据集。
AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(v4,2026-09-24 修订),作者提出 SciMuse,用 5800 万篇论文知识图谱加 LLM 生成个性化科研想法,并由 100 余位研究组负责人对 4400 多个想法按兴趣度评分。具体新信息包括:专家评分整体偏低(5 分制均值 2.40,众数为 1),仅 24.9% 获 4 或 5 分;用知识图谱选出的概念对并未优于仅给标题的 GPT 基线,高被引预测概念对甚至呈弱负相关(1.94σ);同时给出基于图特征的监督网络和 LLM 零样本排序两种兴趣度预测方法。局限是评估仅覆盖兴趣度这一主观指标,未验证想法的新颖性或可执行性,且知识图谱选概念未带来增益。
82
正文
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
arXiv:2405.17044 (cs)
[Submitted on 27 May 2024 (v1), last revised 24 Sep 2026 (this version, v4)]
Title:Generating Interesting Scientific Ideas using Knowledge Graphs and LLMs: Evaluations with 100 Research Group Leaders
Authors:Xuemei Gu, Mario Krenn
View a PDF of the paper titled Generating Interesting Scientific Ideas using Knowledge Graphs and LLMs: Evaluations with 100 Research Group Leaders, by Xuemei Gu and 1 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The rapid growth of scientific literature makes it increasingly challenging for researchers to identify novel and impactful ideas, especially across disciplines. Modern artificial intelligence (AI) systems offer new opportunities for scientific ideation, but how compelling are AI-generated ideas, and how can their quality be improved? Here, we introduce SciMuse, which generates personalized research ideas using a knowledge graph of 58 million papers and a large language model (LLM). A central focus of this work is to understand how interesting these ideas are. Therefore, we conducted a large-scale evaluation in which more than 100 research group leaders -- spanning the natural sciences to the humanities -- rated over 4,400 personalized ideas according to their level of interest. Overall, expert ratings were modest (mean 2.40 on a 5-point scale, most common rating 1), while 24.9% of ideas were rated 4 or 5. We find that supplying concept pairs selected using the knowledge graph does not improve expert-rated interest over a titles-only GPT baseline. High-citation-predicted pairs even showed a weak tendency (1.94$\sigma$) toward lower interest than random pairs. Nevertheless, graph features can be used to control properties of ideas, and, using this unique evaluation dataset, we show that idea interest can be predicted with both a supervised neural network based on graph features and a zero-shot ranking approach based on an LLM. Our work provides an AI methodology for generating scientific ideas and a large-scale interdisciplinary expert evaluation, paving the way to study and improve difficult-to-measure metrics such as expert-perceived scientific interestingness.
Comments:
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Digital Libraries (cs.DL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as:
arXiv:2405.17044 [cs.AI]
(or
arXiv:2405.17044v4 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.17044
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Xuemei Gu [view email]
[v1]
Mon, 27 May 2024 11:00:51 UTC (8,958 KB)
[v2]
Wed, 9 Oct 2024 18:58:13 UTC (8,913 KB)
[v3]
Tue, 7 Jan 2025 21:29:45 UTC (11,536 KB)
[v4]
Thu, 24 Sep 2026 16:53:47 UTC (8,797 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Generating Interesting Scientific Ideas using Knowledge Graphs and LLMs: Evaluations with 100 Research Group Leaders, by Xuemei Gu and 1 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
new
|
recent
| 2024-05
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CL
cs.DL
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)