最新资讯
dev.to 在信任 AI 生成的测试用例前,如何逐条复核 unite.ai Franklin Templeton 构建 AI 研究工作流以揭示风险 techxplore.com AI 助力寻找更优的钛合金 3D 打印工艺参数 engadget.com Perplexity 推出“teammates”日常工作任务 AI agent computerworld.com 别提数据中心:OpenAI 改称“compute campuses” theguardian.com 俄美试图阻止就自主武器制定具有约束力的规则 bloomberg.com Nvidia 加强东南亚芯片追踪以打击走私 thestack.technology 模型路由需求升温,Agent Router 推出开源替代方案 www.youtube.com Google DeepMind 的 Philipp Schmid:AI 同事需要具备的七个要素 unite.ai Cashfree 为 AI Agent 的托管结账加入 WebMCP 工具 dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

论大型语言模型在概念数据库建模中的局限性

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 论文(v2)研究用 LLM 从自然语言需求自动生成实体-关系(ER)图,以支持关系数据库概念建模。实验选取 3 个语言模型,分别采用 Zero-Shot、Chain of Thought、Chain of Thought + Verifier 三种提示技术,在复杂度逐步提升的同一需求场景下生成图,并与文本需求做结构与语义一致性比对。结果显示,LLM 在低复杂度场景表现尚可,但随着需求复杂度上升,不一致、歧义和约束表达失败增多;作者认为当前 LLM 尚不足以在复杂场景可靠使用,验证成本可能抵消其带来的生产力收益。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(v2,2026-09-18 修订),实验设计明确:3 个 LLM × 3 种提示技术(Zero-Shot、CoT、CoT+Verifier),在复杂度递增的需求场景下生成 ER 图并与文本需求做定性比对。具体新信息是随需求复杂度上升,实体/关系/属性识别的不一致、歧义与约束表达失败增多,作者据此认为当前 LLM 在复杂场景尚不可靠、验证成本可能抵消表面生产力收益。局限:摘要未给出模型名称、样本量与量化指标,结论为定性判断,不能外推为所有建模任务。

72

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2605.11986 (cs) [Submitted on 12 May 2026 (v1), last revised 18 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:On the Limitations of Large Language Models for Conceptual Database Modeling Authors:Arthur F. Siqueira, Carlos D. S. Nogueira, Eduarda Farias, Claudio E. C. Campelo, Júlia Menezes View a PDF of the paper titled On the Limitations of Large Language Models for Conceptual Database Modeling, by Arthur F. Siqueira and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:This article analyzes the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) as support for the conceptual modeling of relational databases through the automatic generation of Entity-Relationship (ER) diagrams from natural language requirements. The approach combines different language models with prompt engineering techniques to evaluate their ability to identify entities, relationships, and attributes in a conceptually consistent manner. The experimental evaluation involved three LLMs, each subjected to three prompting techniques (Zero-Shot, Chain of Thought, and Chain of Thought + Verifier), applied to the same requirements scenario with progressively increasing complexity. The generated diagrams were qualitatively analyzed through direct comparison with the textual requirements, considering the structural and semantic adherence of the modeled elements. The results indicate that, although LLMs show reasonable performance in less complex scenarios, their reliability decreases as the complexity of the requirements increases, with a rise in inconsistencies, ambiguities, and failures in representing constraints. These findings reinforce that, in their current state, LLMs are not sufficiently mature for reliable use in complex scenarios, and the cost of validation may offset the apparent productivity gains. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2605.11986 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2605.11986v2 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.11986 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Arthur Félix De Siqueira [view email] [v1] Tue, 12 May 2026 11:35:59 UTC (193 KB) [v2] Fri, 18 Sep 2026 17:59:25 UTC (533 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled On the Limitations of Large Language Models for Conceptual Database Modeling, by Arthur F. Siqueira and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容