最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

混合专家语言模型中专家的高阶剪枝

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 HOPE(Higher-Order Pruning of Experts),一种二阶专家剪枝目标,声称可证明最小化剪枝导致的误差上界,并指出最先进的一阶方法 REAP 是其忽略交互项的特例。作者在三个前沿 MoE 模型(最大 122B 参数)、两个校准集及数学、指令跟随、代码和 agentic 套件等多个基准上评估,称 HOPE 的剪枝决策优于现有方法,优势在高剪枝率和复杂 agentic 任务上最明显:50% 剪枝时平均排名 1.58(5 种方法中),次优的 REAP 为 2.42,agentic coding 最高提升 +6.1%。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 新论文,提出 HOPE 二阶专家剪枝目标,声称可证明最小化剪枝误差上界,并将现有 REAP 一阶方法作为忽略交互项的特例;在三个前沿 MoE 模型(最大 122B 参数)、两个校准集及数学、指令跟随、代码和 agentic 基准上报告 50% 剪枝时平均排名 1.58(对比 REAP 2.42),agentic coding 最高提升 +6.1%。新信息在于把专家协作结构纳入剪枝决策,对 MoE 压缩和长序列复杂任务有潜在价值;局限是结果均为论文自报,尚未见独立复现,且摘要未给出具体模型名与完整实验细节。

78

正文

Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2609.18916 (cs) [Submitted on 16 Sep 2026] Title:Higher-order pruning of experts in mixture-of-experts language models Authors:Alex M. Tseng, Prannay Kaul, Luca Zancato, Wei Xia, Stefano Soatto View a PDF of the paper titled Higher-order pruning of experts in mixture-of-experts language models, by Alex M. Tseng and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models suffer from large parameter counts, which create a significant memory bottleneck. Expert pruning is the most direct approach for reducing this parameter count, yet existing methods make pruning decisions for each expert independently, and assume experts' contributions are purely additive. In reality, expert usage in MoEs is inherently cooperative. We derive HOPE (Higher-Order Pruning of Experts), a second-order pruning objective which provably minimizes an upper bound on the error resulting from pruning. We show that REAP (a state-of-the-art first-order pruning method) is a special case of HOPE where interaction terms are ignored. Across three frontier MoE models (up to 122B parameters), two distinct calibration sets, and multiple benchmarks (including math, instruction following, coding, and an agentic suite), we demonstrate that HOPE produces better pruning decisions than existing methods, and its advantage is most pronounced at high pruning rates and on challenging agentic workloads. At 50% pruning, HOPE outperforms all baselines and achieves an average rank of 1.58 out of 5 methods (versus 2.42 for the next-best method, REAP), with gains of up to +6.1% on agentic coding. Over all conditions, HOPE again achieves the best average rank and surpasses every other method in the majority of head-to-head comparisons. By preserving cooperative expert structure that first-order methods ignore, HOPE enables aggressive compression with minimal degradation, particularly on complex tasks where diverse expert combinations are invoked over long sequences. Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.18916 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2609.18916v1 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.18916 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Alex Tseng [view email] [v1] Wed, 16 Sep 2026 16:55:46 UTC (9,135 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Higher-order pruning of experts in mixture-of-experts language models, by Alex M. Tseng and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.LG new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

aihot::arXiv - LLM 混合专家语言模型中专家的高阶剪枝 09-17 · 原文发布
← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容