最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
论文研究 arxiv.org ·

EviStreams:面向医学系统综述的人在回路 AI 数据提取

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 EviStreams,一个开源、无代码的在线平台,让医学系统综述团队在三个环节控制 AI 辅助数据提取:方案设计(运行前先做结构化分解并获批)、字段规范(基于试点校准的类型化字段定义)、抽取预测(评审者盲态双人复核加裁决)。专家通过表单构建器定义类型化字段而非提示词,对上传 PDF 运行抽取,逐条查看数值及其支撑原文,最终导出可审计的共识结果。在四个临床语料和三个前沿模型家族上的评估显示,抽取质量受字段规范的影响远大于模型选择。系统以 Apache-2.0 许可发布。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,作者来自学术机构,摘要明确描述了系统设计(无代码 Web 平台、三阶段流程、双人盲审与裁决)和评估设置(四个临床语料、三个前沿模型家族),并给出可验证结论:抽取质量更多取决于字段规范而非模型选择。局限在于仅有摘要,未见具体数值、统计显著性和同行评审,评估细节无法核实。对医学系统综述、人在回路 AI 抽取和可审计工作流有实际参考价值。

72

正文

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2609.27418 (cs) [Submitted on 23 Sep 2026] Title:EviStreams: Human-in-the-Loop AI Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews in Medicine Authors:Sai Karthik Kosuri, Ankita Shashikant Bhosale, Michael Glick, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Chris Callison-Burch View a PDF of the paper titled EviStreams: Human-in-the-Loop AI Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews in Medicine, by Sai Karthik Kosuri and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Systematic reviews underpin clinical guidelines, yet their data-extraction step is a major expert-labor bottleneck bound by a protocolized workflow: two reviewers extract each study independently, an adjudicator resolves disagreements, and the team keeps an auditable record of how every value was produced. Large language models can assist with extraction, but that assistance must fit established review protocols and preserve reproducibility. We present EviStreams, a live, open-source, no-code web platform that puts review teams in control of AI-assisted extraction at three key stages: program design (a structured decomposition approved before any code runs), field specification (typed field definitions calibrated from a pilot), and extracted predictions (reviewer-blinded dual review with adjudication). Working through a form builder, a domain expert defines typed fields rather than prompts, runs extraction over uploaded PDFs, inspects every value alongside the supporting passage it came from, and resolves a reviewer-blinded dual review into an auditable consensus export. An evaluation across four clinical corpora and three frontier model families, released with the system, shows that extraction quality is shaped far more by the field specification than by the choice of model. EviStreams is live at this https URL and released under Apache-2.0. Comments: Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2609.27418 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.27418v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27418 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Sai Karthik Kosuri [view email] [v1] Wed, 23 Sep 2026 06:35:07 UTC (2,547 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled EviStreams: Human-in-the-Loop AI Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews in Medicine, by Sai Karthik Kosuri and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容