大模型
tech.slashdot.org ·
KDE 与 GNOME 开发者讨论如何处理 AI 生成贡献
KDE 年度 Akademy 会议出现“AI-native KDE”演讲后，KDE 开发者 Nate Graham 发起关于限制 LLM 辅助贡献的讨论，但讨论迅速升温，版主发出警告、限制评论并最终删除帖子。Graham 称大量非 KDE 贡献者介入，将话题引向 AI 道德争论，相关草案被撤下。GNOME 开发者 Jordan Petridis 则发布其期望的 GNOME LLM 政策，主张禁止 LLM 创建或修改提交至 GNOME 或其基础设施的内容，并称可能要求贡献者证明代码符合该要求，理由是 GNOME 重视集体软件创作中的社会与人的因素。
AI推荐理由 开源桌面项目 KDE 与 GNOME 围绕 LLM 辅助贡献的治理争议，包含 KDE 开发者 Nate Graham 对讨论被外部人士带偏、草案被撤下的具体描述，以及 GNOME 开发者 Jordan Petridis 提出禁止 LLM 生成或修改提交内容的政策主张。属于开发者社区治理与 AI 使用规范的一手讨论，对理解开源项目如何应对 AI 贡献有实际参考价值；但内容为社区观点与政策草案，尚无最终规则或可验证效果。
72
正文
185853609
story
Last weekend KDE's annual Akademy conference included a presentation proposing
an AI-native KDE," writes The Register. This led KDE developer Nate Graham to open a discussion about proposed restrictions on LLM-assisted contributions which "rapidly became heated. Moderators issued warnings, restricted further comments, and eventually removed the thread."
But as Graham writes on his blog, "A bunch of people mostly outside of KDE who disapprove of LLM usage derailed KDE's attempt to add restrictions to LLM usage."
Two people unknown to any KDE contributors appeared and began fighting with one another about the broader topic of the morality of AI, not the proposed guidelines... Someone else outside of KDE set up kdeforpeople.com in an attempt to... pressure KDE into banning LLMs. A bunch of people signed onto it, almost none of whom are known KDE contributors.
The topic was picked up on social media and the press with... varying levels of accuracy. The draft proposal was removed and the whole topic hidden... Yep, that's where we're at in the state of online discourse around AI...
The "lovable, sovereign, AI-native KDE" idea was presented by two people important to KDE in decades past, but who had not made any contributions recently besides this Akademy talk. Their idea does not reflect the overall direction of KDE or Plasma, and I don't think it ever will. If "a lovable, sovereign, AI-native KDE" freaks you out, I believe it is completely reasonable and safe to ignore...
I completely understand why a lot of people have problems with LLMs. I have these concerns as well.
He concluded by asking people not to derail any future process to set usage guidelines, fighting over "the broader topic of AI in general."
"The discussion is gone, but the argument continues," adds The Register:
GNOME developer Jordan Petridis has also published The GNOME LLM Policy That I Want, proposing that LLMs be barred from creating or modifying anything submitted to GNOME or hosted on its infrastructure.
"You might be asked to prove your code meets this requirement," Petridis writes, arguing for proposals that target the norms around developer behavior. His rationale? "The GNOME Project prioritizes the social and human aspects of collective software creation,"