最新资讯
stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

MA-SAPO:面向分数感知提示优化的多智能体推理框架

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 MA-SAPO,一种将评估结果与定向修改直接关联的多智能体提示优化框架。训练阶段由多个智能体解读评估分数、诊断弱点并生成具体修改指令,存为可复用的推理资产;测试阶段由分析智能体检索相关样例与资产,再由精炼智能体基于证据修改提示与回复,使优化过程可解释、可审计、可控。作者称在 HelpSteer1/2 基准上,该方法在多项评估指标上持续优于单次提示、检索增强生成及此前的多智能体方法。论文提交于 2025 年 10 月 18 日,2026 年 9 月 27 日更新至 v3。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 正式论文(v3,2026-09-27 修订),摘要明确给出方法结构与 HelpSteer1/2 基准上的对比结论,事实密度较高;但仅凭摘要无法核实具体指标数值与相对提升幅度,且提示优化方向已有较多同类工作,增量有限。对做 LLM 提示优化与多智能体推理的开发者有直接参考价值。

72

正文

Computer Science > Multiagent Systems arXiv:2510.16635 (cs) [Submitted on 18 Oct 2025 (v1), last revised 27 Sep 2026 (this version, v3)] Title:MA-SAPO: Multi-Agent Reasoning for Score-Aware Prompt Optimization Authors:Juhyeon Lee, Wonduk Seo, Junseo Koh, Wonseok Choi, Hyunjin An, Jian Park, Seunghyun lee, Haihua Chen, Yi Bu View a PDF of the paper titled MA-SAPO: Multi-Agent Reasoning for Score-Aware Prompt Optimization, by Juhyeon Lee and 8 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Prompt optimization has become a practical way to improve the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) without retraining. However, most existing frameworks treat evaluation as a black box, relying solely on outcome scores without explaining why prompts succeed or fail. Moreover, they involve repetitive trial-and-error refinements that remain implicit, offering limited interpretability or actionable guidance for systematic improvement. In this paper, we propose MA-SAPO: a new Multi-Agent Reasoning for Score Aware Prompt Optimization framework that links evaluation outcomes directly to targeted refinements. Specifically, in the Training Phase, multiple agents interpret evaluation scores, diagnose weaknesses, and generate concrete revision directives, which are stored as reusable reasoning assets. In the Test Phase, an analyzer agent retrieves relevant exemplars and assets for a new prompt, and a refiner agent applies evidence-based edits to improve the prompt and its response. By grounding optimization in structured reasoning, MA-SAPO ensures edits are interpretable, auditable, and controllable. Experiments on the HelpSteer1/2 benchmarks show that our framework consistently outperforms single-pass prompting, retrieval-augmented generation, and prior multi-agent methods across multiple evaluation metrics. Comments: Subjects: Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Information Retrieval (cs.IR) Cite as: arXiv:2510.16635 [cs.MA] (or arXiv:2510.16635v3 [cs.MA] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.16635 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Wonduk Seo [view email] [v1] Sat, 18 Oct 2025 20:21:09 UTC (1,304 KB) [v2] Mon, 30 Mar 2026 21:53:02 UTC (3,435 KB) [v3] Sun, 27 Sep 2026 20:17:01 UTC (3,443 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled MA-SAPO: Multi-Agent Reasoning for Score-Aware Prompt Optimization, by Juhyeon Lee and 8 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.MA new | recent | 2025-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.CL cs.HC cs.IR References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容