最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

层、汇点与缩放:多模态大语言模型的自适应证据选择

原文 我的收藏

论文提出 AREA(Adaptive Relevance-guided Evidence Allocation),一种免训练的推理时方法,把多模态大模型的证据高亮视为自适应分配问题。AREA 生成单个 probe token,从固定骨干层读取视觉与文本相关性,据此做三项决策:是否干预(由自然注意力覆盖与视觉 sink 污染控制)、暴露多少证据(由相关性熵决定)、生成过程中何时刷新文本(由因果上下文注意力峰值触发)。作者称在四个 KB-VQA 与七个标准多模态基准、九个冻结 MLLM 检查点上,该方法在免训练高亮方法中取得最佳表现。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 新论文,提出免训练的推理时方法 AREA,将多模态大模型的证据高亮建模为自适应分配:用单个 probe token 从固定骨干层读取视觉与文本相关性,并决定是否干预、暴露多少证据、何时刷新文本。摘要给出在四个 KB-VQA 与七个标准多模态基准、九个冻结 MLLM 检查点上的对比,称在免训练高亮方法中表现最佳。新意在于把固定一次性高亮改为随样本与生成过程变化的自适应策略;局限是仅凭摘要无法核实具体指标与消融细节,且论文尚未经同行评审。

72

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.16795 (cs) [Submitted on 15 Sep 2026] Title:Layers, Sinks, and Scaling: Adaptive Evidence Selection for Multimodal Large Language Models Authors:Zhenbin Wang, Lei Zhang, Lituan Wang, Wei Huang, Yan Wang, Zhenwei Zhang View a PDF of the paper titled Layers, Sinks, and Scaling: Adaptive Evidence Selection for Multimodal Large Language Models, by Zhenbin Wang and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can answer knowledge-intensive visual questions by combining visual evidence from images with facts retrieved from external sources. However, MLLMs may overlook relevant evidence in both modalities, attending weakly to the textual sentences or visual regions needed for the correct answer. Recent efforts address this by highlighting retrieved text and marking visual regions before generation, but apply a fixed, one-shot policy that cannot adapt to three sources of variation: whether highlighting is necessary, how much evidence different examples require, and when different textual evidence becomes relevant as the answer unfolds. We introduce Adaptive Relevance-guided Evidence Allocation (AREA), a training-free inference-time method that formulates evidence highlighting as adaptive allocation. AREA generates a single probe token to read visual and textual relevance from fixed backbone layers, then makes three decisions: i) whether to intervene (controlled by natural attention coverage and visual sink contamination), ii) how much evidence to expose (determined by relevance entropy), and iii) when to refresh text during generation (triggered by causal context-attention peaks). Across four KB-VQA and seven standard multimodal benchmarks with nine frozen MLLM checkpoints, establishes the best performance among training-free highlighting methods. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.16795 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.16795v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.16795 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Zhenbin Wang [view email] [v1] Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:02:52 UTC (11,292 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Layers, Sinks, and Scaling: Adaptive Evidence Selection for Multimodal Large Language Models, by Zhenbin Wang and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容