最新资讯
bloomberg.com 科技股抛售后,Anthropic IPO 估值承压 dev.to 当“按设计工作”成为问题:Claude Code 与 .NET 用户机密 dev.to 用代理修复 3500 个 Sonar 问题花 44 美元,让结果可信花 520 美元 dev.to 底层陷阱:为何企业 AI 使用率跑赢其 EBIT 影响 thenewstack.io Cursor 推出全托管应用部署,对标 Lovable 与 Replit techrepublic.com METR 评估显示 Anthropic 模型进展近乎翻倍,IT 采购方需关注什么 bloomberg.com Nvidia AI 芯片出口成为民主党国会关注目标 computerworld.com Meta 撤回争议性企业 AI 条款 bloomberg.com 台积电据报考虑生产先进 AI 存储芯片 www.infoq.com Yelp 为 AI Assistant 融合原生与服务器驱动 UI computerworld.com 英国监管机构:企业须为自家 AI 代理的错误负责 siliconangle.com Atomicwork 推出面向企业 IT 与安全的认证 AI 同事市场
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

让价值模型回归:用于 LLM 强化学习中价值建模的生成式评论家

原文 我的收藏

论文重新审视 LLM 强化学习中的价值建模,认为传统判别式评论家难以可靠训练部分源于表达能力受限,且缩放实验显示其不随规模稳定提升。作者提出 Generative Actor-Critic(GenAC),以先进行思维链推理再输出价值估计的生成式评论家替代一次性标量预测,并引入 In-Context Conditioning 使评论家在整个训练过程中对当前 actor 保持校准。作者报告其在价值近似、排序可靠性与分布外泛化上均有改善,并带来优于基于价值和无价值基线的下游 RL 表现。

AI推荐理由 arXiv cs.LG 论文(v2,2026-09-09 修订),针对 LLM 强化学习中价值模型难训练的问题,提出 Generative Actor-Critic(GenAC),用带思维链推理的生成式评论家替代一次性标量价值预测,并引入 In-Context Conditioning 使评论家随 actor 训练保持校准。作者称其在价值近似、排序可靠性和分布外泛化上均有提升,并转化为优于基于价值与无价值基线的下游 RL 表现。属于 LLM RL 训练方法层面的实质进展,对后训练与 credit assignment 研究有直接价值;但摘要未给出具体基准与数值,效果需看全文验证。

78

正文

Computer Science > Machine Learning arXiv:2604.10701 (cs) [Submitted on 12 Apr 2026 (v1), last revised 9 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:Bringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning Authors:Zikang Shan, Han Zhong, Liwei Wang, Li Zhao View a PDF of the paper titled Bringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning, by Zikang Shan and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Credit assignment is a central challenge in reinforcement learning (RL). Classical actor-critic methods address this challenge through fine-grained advantage estimation based on a learned value function. However, learned value models are often avoided in modern large language model (LLM) RL because conventional discriminative critics are difficult to train reliably. We revisit value modeling and argue that this difficulty is partly due to limited expressiveness. In particular, representation complexity theory suggests that value functions can be hard to approximate under the one-shot prediction paradigm used by existing value models, and our scaling experiments show that such critics do not improve reliably with scale. Motivated by this observation, we propose Generative Actor-Critic (GenAC), which replaces one-shot scalar value prediction with a generative critic that performs chain-of-thought reasoning before producing a value estimate. We further introduce In-Context Conditioning, which helps the critic remain calibrated to the current actor throughout training. GenAC improves value approximation, ranking reliability, and out-of-distribution generalization, and these gains translate into stronger downstream RL performance than both value-based and value-free baselines. Overall, our results suggest that stronger value modeling is a promising direction for improving credit assignment in LLM reinforcement learning. Comments: Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2604.10701 [cs.LG] (or arXiv:2604.10701v2 [cs.LG] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.10701 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Zikang Shan [view email] [v1] Sun, 12 Apr 2026 15:54:11 UTC (267 KB) [v2] Wed, 9 Sep 2026 17:53:12 UTC (437 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Bringing Value Models Back: Generative Critics for Value Modeling in LLM Reinforcement Learning, by Zikang Shan and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.LG new | recent | 2026-04 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.CL References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) IArxiv recommender toggle IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容