最新资讯
dev.to 如何将 PostgreSQL 接入 AI agent 并对写入操作设置审批 unite.ai AWS 在 SageMaker 推理端点加入 NVIDIA GPU 分区支持 unite.ai BMO 在信用卡客服引入 agentic AI 案件准备 theverge.com Meta 的 Muse AI 可创建自定义 spaces,按需生成应用式体验 thenewstack.io Meta 用最强 AI 模型训练多数用户实际使用的模型 bloomberg.com Anthropic IPO 买家估值预期低至 1.1 万亿美元 dev.to 用 Switch 构建 AI 投资委员会:多空研究员 Agent 协作 bloomberg.com 微软正结束向甲骨文租用 AI 云算力的协议 the-decoder.com Perplexity 推出常驻 AI Agent“Teammates” dev.to osFoundry的Loop和Graph是什么,何时该用哪个? dev.to 限制上下文而非限制评审:面向开源补丁的字节预算证据包 dev.to 约束自主智能体:用 GKE Agent Sandbox 实现亚秒级零信任执行
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

超越一刀切:多模态大语言模型中视觉 token 剪枝的样本自适应策略路由

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 预印本针对多模态大语言模型处理大量视觉 token 带来的推理开销,指出既有视觉 token 剪枝方法隐含假设单一固定策略适用于所有输入,而分析显示不同剪枝策略在相当比例的单个样本上存在互补优势。作者提出 VIP-Router,一个轻量视觉剪枝路由器,基于低成本视觉与文本特征为每个输入自适应选择最合适的候选剪枝策略,并在预测剪枝不利时保留全 token 推理选项。在 VTC-Bench Group A 上,VIP-Router 在所有压缩比下均优于最佳固定策略基线,平均准确率相对提升 26.9%,计入实际 token 成本后平均效用相对提升 22.0%。该方法即插即用,不修改底层剪枝算法或模型权重,可训练参数仅为主干的 0.017%,并在多种 MLLM 骨干和未见基准上取得一致增益。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,问题与实验设置清晰:指出固定视觉 token 剪枝策略忽略样本级互补性,提出轻量 VIP-Router 按输入自适应选择剪枝策略,在 VTC-Bench Group A 上所有压缩比均优于最佳固定策略,平均准确率相对提升 26.9%,计入实际 token 成本后平均效用相对提升 22.0%,可训练参数仅为主干 0.017%,且即插即用、跨骨干与未见基准有效。对多模态推理成本优化有实际参考价值,但结果未经同行评审。

72

正文

Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition arXiv:2609.10346 (cs) [Submitted on 9 Sep 2026] Title:Beyond One-Size-Fits-All: Sample-Adaptive Strategy Routing for Vision Token Pruning in MLLMs Authors:Haiji Liang, Pengfei Zhou, Zhenglin Wan, Wei Wang, Yang You, Wangbo Zhao View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond One-Size-Fits-All: Sample-Adaptive Strategy Routing for Vision Token Pruning in MLLMs, by Haiji Liang and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) process hundreds or thousands of visual tokens per image, incurring prohibitive inference costs. While existing vision token pruning methods mitigate this overhead, they implicitly assume that a single fixed pruning strategy can be applied uniformly across all inputs. Our analysis further reveals that ranking pruning methods by average benchmark accuracy conceals substantial sample-wise complementarity: although the average-best strategy excels overall, alternative strategies prove superior on a significant fraction of individual samples. To harness this diversity, we propose VIP-Router, a lightweight VIsion Pruning Router that adaptively selects the pruning strategy predicted to be best suited to each input at a specified pruning level. Conditioned on low-cost visual and textual features, VIP-Router identifies the most suitable candidate strategy while retaining full-token inference as an option when pruning is predicted to be unfavorable. Evaluated on a curated suite of pruning-sensitive visual perception benchmarks, VTC-Bench Group A, VIP-Router consistently outperforms the best fixed strategy baseline across all reduction ratios, achieving a 26.9% relative improvement in average accuracy, and a 22.0% relative increase in average utility after accounting for realized token cost. Crucially, VIP-Router operates in a plug-and-play manner without modifying underlying pruning algorithms or model weights, introducing trainable parameters equivalent to merely 0.017\% of the backbone. Furthermore, VIP-Router proves effective across various MLLM backbones and yields consistent gains on unseen benchmarks, highlighting the potential of sample adaptive routing for visual token pruning. Comments: Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.10346 [cs.CV] (or arXiv:2609.10346v1 [cs.CV] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.10346 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Haiji Liang [view email] [v1] Wed, 9 Sep 2026 15:44:32 UTC (1,730 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond One-Size-Fits-All: Sample-Adaptive Strategy Routing for Vision Token Pruning in MLLMs, by Haiji Liang and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CV new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容