最新资讯
reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 bloomberg.com AI 抛售蔓延至信用市场,软银领跌亚洲美元债 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

FitAQA:面向多模态大语言模型的健身动作质量评估基准

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 FitAQA,一个评估多模态大语言模型健身动作质量评估能力的基准,包含 2,219 段视频与 5,512 条问答实例,覆盖 30 种自重训练动作。作者与运动科学专家合作建立统一错误分类体系,定义 6 个质量维度(对齐、对称、稳定、协调、节奏、完整)下的 38 类常见动作错误,并设置感知、判断、时序定位三项任务。评测表明现有 MLLM 难以全面评估动作质量并精确定位错误,对照实验显示视觉感知是关键瓶颈:提供真值感知证据后判断性能明显提升。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(v2,2026-09-17 修订),提出 FitAQA 基准:2,219 段视频、5,512 条 QA、覆盖 30 种自重训练动作,并与运动科学专家合作定义 38 类动作错误、6 个质量维度,设计感知、判断、时序定位三类任务。实验显示当前 MLLM 在综合评估与精确定位错误上仍有困难,且视觉感知是主要瓶颈(提供真值感知证据后判断性能显著提升)。新信息具体、可验证,但属垂直领域基准,对通用 AI 与产业落地的直接价值有限。

72

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2608.08736 (cs) [Submitted on 9 Aug 2026 (v1), last revised 17 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:FitAQA: A Benchmark of Fitness Action Quality Assessment for Multimodal Large Language Models Authors:Kaili Zheng, Kaiwen Wang, Xun Zhu, Qingyuan Yang, Chenyi Guo, Ji Wu View a PDF of the paper titled FitAQA: A Benchmark of Fitness Action Quality Assessment for Multimodal Large Language Models, by Kaili Zheng and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Fitness Action Quality Assessment (AQA) is important for intelligent sports training, yet the capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in this setting remain underexplored. Existing benchmarks rely on action-specific annotation schemes and focus primarily on final assessment outputs, offering limited insight into how models assess exercise quality. We introduce FitAQA, a systematic benchmark for evaluating MLLMs in fitness AQA, containing 2,219 videos and 5,512 QA instances across 30 bodyweight exercises. In collaboration with experts in sports science, we develop a unified form error taxonomy that defines 38 recurring form errors within six complementary quality dimensions: alignment, symmetry, stability, coordination, tempo, and completeness. This taxonomy provides a shared assessment framework across different exercises. FitAQA further formulates three evaluation tasks: perception for recognizing relevant visual evidence, judgement for combining that evidence with domain knowledge to assess execution correctness, and temporal grounding for localizing form errors over time. Extensive evaluation shows that current MLLMs still struggle to assess exercise quality comprehensively and localize form errors precisely. Controlled experiments further indicate that visual perception is a key bottleneck, as judgement performance improves substantially when ground-truth perceptual evidence is provided. The dataset is available at this https URL. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2608.08736 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2608.08736v2 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.08736 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Kaili Zheng [view email] [v1] Sun, 9 Aug 2026 14:28:17 UTC (3,321 KB) [v2] Thu, 17 Sep 2026 16:31:38 UTC (3,317 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled FitAQA: A Benchmark of Fitness Action Quality Assessment for Multimodal Large Language Models, by Kaili Zheng and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容