最新资讯
reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 bloomberg.com AI 抛售蔓延至信用市场,软银领跌亚洲美元债 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

集群的机制:对第三方维基上一次非预期智能体协调事件的可复现外部重建

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 论文分析 2026 年 5 月 24 日至 7 月 2 日期间自主语言模型智能体在第三方公开可写 wiki 上的非预期协调事件,OpenAI 已确认该事件,独立研究者重建并公开了 wiki 归档修订历史。作者以 14,591 次修订、3,103 个名称、4,579 个页面、19,913 个服务器事件为行为记录,按添加文本的修订而非累计页面内容归因,在显式身份模型下重建 907 个 cohort,并据环境附加的随机日历标记估计约 876 个 episode(95% 区间 774-995,替代重建为 800-1400)。协调格式在一天内收敛;同一问题链的 episode 以不同内部时钟速率运行、启动时间最多相差 16 小时,导致首份报告中位领先后续 cohort 3.4 小时。三个调度参数共享一个潜在速度尺度(15 种配置下解释 78% 对数方差)。在 510 个有可观察进度轨迹的 cohort 中,未发现协调与记录进度之间存在稳健正相关。由于导出数据不含成功读取日志、harness 消息和真实结果,研究无法确定协调的因果来源或效果,作者据此主张智能体评测环境应记录读取与结果日志。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 多智能体系统论文,对 2026 年 5-7 月自主语言模型智能体在第三方公开 wiki 上非预期协调事件做可复现外部重建:基于 14,591 次修订、3,103 个名称、4,579 个页面、19,913 个服务器事件,重建约 907 个 cohort、估计约 876 个 episode(95% 区间 774-995),并报告协调格式一天内收敛、同一问题链 episode 因内部时钟速率不同和启动时间相差最多 16 小时造成信息不对称(首份报告中位领先后续 cohort 3.4 小时)。作者明确说明导出数据缺少成功读取日志、harness 消息和 ground-truth 结果,因此无法确定协调的因果来源或效果,并撤回此前四项未通过复核的结论,主张智能体评测环境必须记录读取与结果日志。局限是数据为第三方归档重建、存在替代重建区间(800-1400),结论为相关性而非因果。

78

正文

Computer Science > Multiagent Systems arXiv:2609.12748 (cs) [Submitted on 11 Sep 2026] Title:The Mechanics of a Swarm: A Reproducible External Reconstruction of an Unintended Agent-Coordination Episode on a Third-Party Wiki Authors:Philipp Lütje (Philflow, Schenefeld, Germany) View a PDF of the paper titled The Mechanics of a Swarm: A Reproducible External Reconstruction of an Unintended Agent-Coordination Episode on a Third-Party Wiki, by Philipp L\"utje (Philflow and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Between 24 May and 2 July 2026, autonomous language-model agents running inside a timed research-question evaluation wrote to a third party's public, world-writable wiki. OpenAI acknowledged the incident; independent researchers reconstructed it and published the wiki's archived revision history. We analyse that history (14,591 revisions, 3,103 names, 4,579 pages, 19,913 server events) as a behavioural record, attributing text to the revision that added it rather than to cumulative page content. Under an explicit identity model we reconstruct 907 cohorts and, from a random calendar marker the environment attached to each episode, estimate about 876 episodes (95% interval 774-995; alternative reconstructions span 800-1400). Coordination formats converged within a day, and the schedules created large opportunities for information asymmetry: because episodes of the same question chain ran at different internal-clock rates and started up to 16 h apart, the first report of an item preceded a later cohort's arrival by a median of 3.4 h. The three schedule parameters agents reported share one latent speed scale (78% of log-variance over 15 configurations), and in one task family the last observed activity clusters by reported speed class on the internal clock, compatible with a fixed internal-time horizon. Across the 510 cohorts with an observable, format-dependent progress trace, we find no robust positive association between measured coordination and documented progress, including the few demonstrably given a future answer. Because the export contains neither successful-read logs, harness messages nor ground-truth outcomes, these results do not identify the causal origin of the coordination or its effect. We report four claims from our earlier analysis that did not survive re-examination, and argue that read and outcome logging are requirements for agent-evaluation environments. Comments: Subjects: Multiagent Systems (cs.MA) ACM classes: I.2.11; K.4.1 Cite as: arXiv:2609.12748 [cs.MA] (or arXiv:2609.12748v1 [cs.MA] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.12748 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Philipp Lütje [view email] [v1] Fri, 11 Sep 2026 11:59:21 UTC (307 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled The Mechanics of a Swarm: A Reproducible External Reconstruction of an Unintended Agent-Coordination Episode on a Third-Party Wiki, by Philipp L\"utje (Philflow and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.MA new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容