大模型
全球精选 ·
@Robert Hart
数学家要求 OpenAI 证明未使用其成果
又一位研究者就 OpenAI 数学能力背后的训练数据提出质疑。在围绕模型是否受益于未发表成果的争论爆发数日后，数学家 Andreas Thom 在 Mastodon 上指控 OpenAI 行为不道德、"不诚实"，且对训练数据来源缺乏透明度，并担心他与同事此前与 ChatGPT 的交互可能被用于其数学领域的成果。报道正文被截断，OpenAI 尚未在片段中回应。
AI推荐理由 The Verge 报道第二位数学家 Andreas Thom 公开质疑 OpenAI 数学训练数据来源，指控其不透明和不诚实，并提到此前已有一轮关于未发表成果的争议。这是对训练数据合规与学术伦理的具体新指控，涉及可验证的公开讨论，但正文片段被截断，缺乏 OpenAI 回应和证据细节，需保留指控未经证实的不确定性。
72
评论 75
社区积分 62
正文
Domain: theverge.com
Points: 19 | Comments: 7
[Top Comments]
- If I understand correctly OpenAI cannot provide it. Because the models are essentially black boxes, especially this far after the fact, determining if this result built on training data based on conversations about the problem is impossible. So unless they can prove those conversations were never used for training then there’s no way to know.
- Why are people so possessive? Why wouldn't they just release their work for the profit of humanity? I'm genuinely curious.