最新资讯
www.infoq.com GitLab 19.5 将 Agentic 开发纳入 DevOps 平台的治理体系 dev.to 在信任 AI 生成的测试用例前,如何逐条复核 unite.ai Franklin Templeton 构建 AI 研究工作流以揭示风险 techxplore.com AI 助力寻找更优的钛合金 3D 打印工艺参数 engadget.com Perplexity 推出“teammates”日常工作任务 AI agent computerworld.com 别提数据中心:OpenAI 改称“compute campuses” theguardian.com 俄美试图阻止就自主武器制定具有约束力的规则 bloomberg.com Nvidia 加强东南亚芯片追踪以打击走私 thestack.technology 模型路由需求升温,Agent Router 推出开源替代方案 www.youtube.com Google DeepMind 的 Philipp Schmid:AI 同事需要具备的七个要素 unite.ai Cashfree 为 AI Agent 的托管结账加入 WebMCP 工具 dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org · @Jiazhen Pan

MedRSI:面向医疗 Agent 的临床对齐递归自我改进

原文 我的收藏

医疗 agent 通常将通用推理模型与专用临床工具结合,但其能力在部署前基本由临床医生和工程师设计固定。递归自我改进(RSI)提供另一种范式,使 agent 从自身失败中学习并自主扩展能力,但直接用于医疗会带来根本性安全挑战。论文提出 MedRSI,称其为首个面向医学的递归自我改进框架,通过工具组合与任务特定模型训练持续把诊断失败转化为新的临床能力。受临床实践启发,MedRSI 引入两种临床对齐的自演化机制:临床成本感知的失败优先级排序,按潜在临床后果而非仅按频率决定改进方向;以及快发现与慢注册分离,将快速能力发明与保守注册流程区分开。

AI推荐理由 提出面向医疗 agent 的递归自我改进框架 MedRSI,通过工具组合与任务特定模型训练把诊断失败转化为新临床能力,并引入临床成本感知的失败优先级与快发现慢注册机制。属于医疗 AI 与 agent 自演化交叉方向,但摘要未提供量化结果,安全性主张仍需验证。

74

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.24838v1 (cs) [Submitted on 21 Sep 2026] Title:MedRSI: Recursive Self-Improvement for Medical Agents via Clinically Aligned Self-Evolution Authors:Junde Wu, Jiayuan Zhu, Minghao Hu, Fenglin Liu, Jiazhen Pan View a PDF of the paper titled MedRSI: Recursive Self-Improvement for Medical Agents via Clinically Aligned Self-Evolution, by Junde Wu and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Medical agents increasingly combine general reasoning models with specialized clinical tools, yet their capabilities remain largely fixed by what clinicians and engineers design before deployment. Recursive self-improvement (RSI) offers a different paradigm in which agents learn from their own failures and autonomously expand their capabilities, but directly applying RSI to medicine introduces fundamental safety challenges. We introduce MedRSI, the first recursive self-improvement framework for medicine, which continuously transforms diagnostic failures into new clinical capabilities through tool composition and task-specific model training. Inspired by clinical practice, MedRSI introduces two mechanisms for clinically aligned self-evolution. Clinical-cost-aware failure prioritization directs improvement toward errors according to their potential clinical consequences rather than frequency alone. Fast discovery with slow registration separates rapid capability invention from conservative adoption, allowing new tools to enter the persistent agent only after demonstrating sustained benefit across subsequent patient cohorts. Across public glaucoma and heart disease benchmarks and two private clinical tasks, MedRSI progressively develops segmentation, measurement, prediction, multimodal reasoning, and generative capabilities, surpasses manually engineered medical agents, and autonomously discovers solutions to clinical problems not anticipated by its original designers. Our results show that medical agents need not remain constrained by capabilities specified before deployment: with clinically grounded mechanisms governing what to improve and what to retain, they can continuously construct, validate, and accumulate new capabilities from diagnostic experience. Code is available at this https URL. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.24838 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.24838v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.24838 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Junde Wu [view email] [v1] Mon, 21 Sep 2026 16:19:33 UTC (237 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled MedRSI: Recursive Self-Improvement for Medical Agents via Clinically Aligned Self-Evolution, by Junde Wu and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容