最新资讯
dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 bloomberg.com AI 抛售蔓延至信用市场,软银领跌亚洲美元债 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露 dev.to 你的 Agent Harness 应具备的 17 项能力 dev.to 离线 AI 记忆中 0.8 余弦阈值为何失效 dev.to Kimi K3.1 Pro 开放权重:自托管 2.8T 模型前的开发者清单
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org · @Sennur Ulukus

GRASP:面向智能体 AI 战略规划的生成、修订与评估框架

原文 我的收藏

论文针对 LLM 随任务复杂度上升可靠性下降的问题,提出策略感知的多阶段规划框架 GRASP,将规划流水线解耦为上下文隔离的专用模块:预编译全局宏观准则(GenPlan)、在隔离上下文窗口中探索备选局部策略(RevPlan)、用多准则判别器独立评估轨迹(VerPlan)。实验称在 Natural Plan Calendar Scheduling(约 +12.4%)、ZebraLogic(约 +30.8%)和 SciBench Math 上相对直接 LLM 规划器取得显著准确率提升,并在多任务扩展下保持优势。

AI推荐理由 提出 GRASP 多阶段规划框架,将规划流程解耦为 GenPlan(预编译全局宏观准则)、RevPlan(隔离上下文窗口内探索局部策略)与 VerPlan(多准则判别器独立评估轨迹)。在 Natural Plan Calendar Scheduling(约 +12.4%)、ZebraLogic(约 +30.8%)与 SciBench Math 上报告相对直接 LLM 规划器的准确率提升,并称在多任务扩展下标准规划器性能下降时仍保持优势。方法结构清晰、有量化对比,但均为摘要自述结果。

70

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.30147v1 (cs) [Submitted on 24 Sep 2026] Title:GRASP: Generating, Revising, and Assessing for Strategic Planning with Agentic AI Authors:Arunabh Srivastava, Mohammad A. (Amir)Khojastepour, Srimat Chakradhar, Sennur Ulukus View a PDF of the paper titled GRASP: Generating, Revising, and Assessing for Strategic Planning with Agentic AI, by Arunabh Srivastava and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) typically exhibit a performance profile where reliability degrades as task complexity increases. We address the challenge of generating high-quality natural language executable plans for complex tasks by introducing $\textbf{GRASP}$, a strategy-aware, multi-stage planning framework. GRASP decouples the planning pipeline across specialized, context-isolated modules: it pre-compiles global macro-guidelines (GenPlan), explores alternative localized strategies within isolated context windows (RevPlan), and independently evaluates trajectories using a multi-criteria discriminator (VerPlan). Empirical evaluations show that GRASP consistently establishes a new state-of-the-art frontier across diverse datasets, yielding substantial accuracy gains over direct LLM planners on Natural Plan Calendar Scheduling ($\sim$12.4$\%$$\uparrow$), ZebraLogic ($\sim$30.8$\%$$\uparrow$), and SciBench Math. Crucially, under multi-task scaling-where standard planners suffer immediate performance collapse-GRASP completely flattens the multi-task degradation penalty. In interleaved dual-task environments, GRASP achieves an absolute accuracy gain of up to 16.7$\%$ over direct LLM planners. Furthermore, by isolating context and enforcing strict macro-regularization, GRASP outperforms frontier reasoning models (such as GPT-5-mini) by a margin of 14.5$\%$. Comments: Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA) Cite as: arXiv:2609.30147 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.30147v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30147 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Arunabh Srivastava [view email] [v1] Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:11:35 UTC (195 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled GRASP: Generating, Revising, and Assessing for Strategic Planning with Agentic AI, by Arunabh Srivastava and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL cs.LG cs.MA References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容