最新资讯
reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 bloomberg.com AI 抛售蔓延至信用市场,软银领跌亚洲美元债 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

评估 LLM 生成的学生写作反馈中的反馈焦点与教学适应性

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 预印本研究 LLM 生成的写作反馈是否体现专家教师的教学实践,重点考察反馈焦点与适应性。作者将 Narciss 分类法细化为七种反馈焦点类型,对三门大学写作课程中教师与 LLM 生成的反馈进行标注,并发布 FeedType 基准,涵盖 6 个 LLM 在 3 种提示策略下的反馈。结果显示,多数 LLM 能覆盖大部分反馈焦点类型,但其分布与教师反馈不一致,适应性水平参差不齐,且没有一个模型能匹配教师的适应行为。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文,作者与摘要明确,提出将 Narciss 分类法细化为七类反馈焦点,并发布 FeedType 基准(含 6 个 LLM、3 种提示策略下的教师与 LLM 反馈标注)。新信息在于对反馈焦点分布与教学适应性的系统评估,结论是多数 LLM 虽覆盖多数焦点类型,但分布与教师不一致,且无一能匹配教师的适应性行为。局限是仅覆盖三门大学写作课程,属预印本,未提供具体模型名称与量化细节。

72

正文

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2609.28026 (cs) [Submitted on 23 Sep 2026] Title:Evaluating Feedback Focus and Pedagogical Adaptivity in LLM-Generated Feedback on Student Writing Authors:Norah Almousa, Shayan Peyghambari Oskoui, Raquel Coelho, Gayle Rogers, Xiang Lorraine Li, Diane Litman View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating Feedback Focus and Pedagogical Adaptivity in LLM-Generated Feedback on Student Writing, by Norah Almousa and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:We investigate whether state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) generate feedback that reflects the pedagogical practices of expert teachers in terms of feedback focus and adaptivity. Previous evaluation efforts have examined feedback characteristics, its impact on learning, and its target, yet the focus of feedback and its adaptivity remains largely overlooked. To bridge this gap, we adopt and refine Narciss's taxonomy into seven feedback focus types to annotate teacher and LLM-generated feedback across three university writing courses. We release FeedType, a benchmark containing annotated teacher and LLM feedback from six LLMs under three prompting strategies. We assess the coverage and distribution of feedback focus types, and examine whether LLMs adapt their feedback across draft stages and student performance levels as an expert instructor does. Our findings show that while most LLMs cover most feedback focus types, they fail to reflect teacher feedback distributions and show varying levels of adaptivity, with none matching the teachers' adaptive behavior. We believe FeedType will support future research on pedagogical alignment in LLM feedback generation. Comments: Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.28026 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.28026v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.28026 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Norah Almousa [view email] [v1] Wed, 23 Sep 2026 12:51:08 UTC (616 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating Feedback Focus and Pedagogical Adaptivity in LLM-Generated Feedback on Student Writing, by Norah Almousa and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容