最新资讯
dev.to 为 CI/CD 构建 AI 质量门禁 dev.to Kakao 发布面向 AI Agent 的决策模型 Kanana-2-v-decide computerworld.com Microsoft 对 Copilot Chat 企业用户扩大未公开的使用限制 pub.towardsai.net Google 发布 Gemini 4 Carbon:主打网络安全能力的前沿模型 gradientflow.com METR 研究:AI 正在加速构建 AI 的团队本身 www.infoq.com GitLab 19.5 将 Agentic 开发纳入 DevOps 平台的治理体系 aiacceleratorinstitute.com 研究:AI Agent 的复杂流程编排可能反而是问题所在 pub.towardsai.net MongoDB 推出 Vercel AI SDK 集成:为 AI 应用提供持久记忆 thenewstack.io Google 捐出被 Anthropic 和 OpenAI 使用的代码沙箱 gVisor,押注 AI Agent 基础设施开源 dev.to 在信任 AI 生成的测试用例前,如何逐条复核 unite.ai Franklin Templeton 构建 AI 研究工作流以揭示风险 techxplore.com AI 助力寻找更优的钛合金 3D 打印工艺参数
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org · @Amir Feder

面向 LLM 助手的可验证社会推理评测

原文 我的收藏

LLM 助手常用于日常社交建议,但在咨询场景中评估其社会推理很困难:助手需从主观用户叙述中理解情境,且他人意图等社会属性通常缺乏可验证真值。作者提出 Fuse,一个多智能体仿真框架,其中带隐藏动机的目标 Agent 与其他 Agent(含代表用户的 Agent)交互,用户再向被评估助手咨询以推断目标动机,从而在构造上提供可验证真值。仿真保真度通过 24k 条标注的人类研究验证。作者用 Fuse 评测 12 个 LLM,并系统隔离关键因素,发现用户中介会加剧社会推理的固有难度。

AI推荐理由 提出 Fuse 多智能体仿真框架,用隐藏动机的目标 Agent 构造可验证的社会推理真值,并用 24k 标注的人类研究验证仿真保真度,随后评测 12 个 LLM;为 LLM 助手社会推理评估提供了可验证的评测路径,但结论仍属仿真环境下的分析。

70

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.17496v1 (cs) [Submitted on 15 Sep 2026] Title:Verifiable Social Reasoning for LLM Assistants Authors:Amir Taubenfeld, Zorik Gekhman, Avigail Grinstein-Dabush, Itay Laish, Ariel Goldstein, Marian Croak, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias, Amir Feder View a PDF of the paper titled Verifiable Social Reasoning for LLM Assistants, by Amir Taubenfeld and Zorik Gekhman and Avigail Grinstein-Dabush and Itay Laish and Ariel Goldstein and Marian Croak and Avinatan Hassidim and Yossi Matias and Amir Feder View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:LLM assistants are widely used for daily social advice, yet evaluating their social reasoning in such consultation settings remains challenging since (i) it requires setups where the assistant learns about social situations from subjective user narratives, and (ii) social properties, such as others' intentions, typically lack verifiable ground truth. To address these challenges, we introduce Fuse, a multi-agent simulation framework for studying user-mediated social reasoning. In Fuse, a target agent with a hidden motive interacts with other agents including one representing the user, who then consults the evaluated assistant to infer the target's motive, providing verifiable ground truth by construction. Simulation faithfulness is validated through a human study with 24k annotations. We apply Fuse to 12 LLMs and demonstrate its analytical utility by systematically isolating key factors, showing that (i) user mediation compounds the inherent difficulty of social reasoning; (ii) LLMs exhibit systematic sensitivity to biased user framing; (iii) models can require more details than humans need to reach a correct prediction; and (iv) longer conversations do not always improve performance despite providing opportunities for clarifying questions. We open-source Fuse and a dataset with 21k examples. Comments: Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2609.17496 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.17496v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.17496 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Zorik Gekhman [view email] [v1] Tue, 15 Sep 2026 17:37:29 UTC (586 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Verifiable Social Reasoning for LLM Assistants, by Amir Taubenfeld and Zorik Gekhman and Avigail Grinstein-Dabush and Itay Laish and Ariel Goldstein and Marian Croak and Avinatan Hassidim and Yossi Matias and Amir Feder View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

Amir Feder 面向 LLM 助手的可验证社会推理评测 09-16 · 原文发布
← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容