智能体
arxiv.org ·
面向痴呆症护理的受治理AI智能体协调:架构、安全契约与证据驱动的工作流验证
论文提出受治理闭环智能体协调(GCAC)架构,用于社区痴呆症护理工作流中有边界的智能体参与。该架构将护理协调失败证据与政策义务转化为可追踪系统需求,通过类型化事件-记忆-决策-行动-结果契约分离观察、受治理记忆、规划、确定性策略执行、执行与结果监控。参考测试台评估 18 条证据衍生轨迹,涵盖缺失记录、用药冲突、护理者报告、服务失败、同意变更、过期状态、重复事件、不可信文本及疑似急性神经变化。GCAC 满足全部 18 条契约判据,零策略违规工具调用,并正确保留义务、拒绝过期状态、创建人工交接并记录工作流关闭;事件阈值与无状态规划器对照分别满足 2/18 和 1/18 判据,组件消融将失败定位到被移除的记忆、策略或版本功能。作者指出结果确立的是架构一致性而非临床有效性,展示智能体系统可自动化对账、路由、文档与随访,同时保留人类对重大护理决策的权威。
AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,提出 GCAC 架构,将痴呆症护理协调失败证据转化为可追踪系统需求,通过类型化事件-记忆-决策-行动-结果契约分离观察、受治理记忆、规划、确定性策略执行、执行与结果监控。参考测试台评估 18 条证据衍生轨迹,覆盖缺失记录、用药冲突、护理者报告、服务失败、同意变更、过期状态、重复事件、不可信文本和疑似急性神经变化;GCAC 满足全部 18 条契约判据且零策略违规工具调用,事件阈值与无状态规划器对照分别满足 2/18 和 1/18,组件消融将失败定位到被移除的记忆、策略或版本功能。作者明确结果仅确立架构一致性而非临床有效性,并保留人类对重大护理决策的权威。局限在于仅为架构验证,无临床效果证据,且为预印本未经同行评审。
72
正文
Computer Science > Multiagent Systems
arXiv:2609.25956 (cs)
[Submitted on 22 Sep 2026]
Title:Governed AI-Agent Coordination for Dementia Care: Architecture, Safety Contracts, and Evidence-Derived Workflow Verification
Authors:Francesca Medda, Hui Gong
View a PDF of the paper titled Governed AI-Agent Coordination for Dementia Care: Architecture, Safety Contracts, and Evidence-Derived Workflow Verification, by Francesca Medda and Hui Gong
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Dementia care increasingly involves connected sensors, medication devices, electronic records, and assistive technologies. Interoperability can transport observations but cannot maintain an accountable care state, reconcile evidence, determine who may act, or verify resolution. The shift from large language models to agentic engineering creates a systems opportunity: an external runtime can maintain memory across episodes, plan over goals and constraints, invoke tools, observe outcomes, and enforce governance. This paper presents Governed Closed-loop Agent Coordination (GCAC), an architecture for bounded agent participation in community dementia-care workflows. Evidence on care-coordination failures and policy obligations is translated into traceable system requirements. GCAC separates observation, governed memory, planning, deterministic policy enforcement, execution, and outcome monitoring through a typed event-memory-decision-action-outcome contract. A reference harness evaluates 18 evidence-derived traces covering missing records, medication conflict, caregiver reports, service failure, consent change, stale state, duplicate events, untrusted text, and suspected acute neurological change. GCAC satisfies all 18 contract oracles with zero policy-violating tool calls and correctly preserves obligations, rejects stale state, creates human hand-offs, and records workflow closure. Event-threshold and stateless-planner controls satisfy 2/18 and 1/18 oracles, respectively. Component ablations localise failures to the removed memory, policy, or versioning function. The results establish architectural conformance rather than clinical effectiveness and show how agentic systems can automate reconciliation, routing, documentation, and follow-up while preserving human authority over consequential care decisions.
Comments:
Subjects:
Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
Cite as:
arXiv:2609.25956 [cs.MA]
(or
arXiv:2609.25956v1 [cs.MA] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.25956
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Hui Gong [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 22 Sep 2026 10:09:01 UTC (31 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Governed AI-Agent Coordination for Dementia Care: Architecture, Safety Contracts, and Evidence-Derived Workflow Verification, by Francesca Medda and Hui Gong
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Ancillary-file links:
Ancillary files (details):
ablation_results_by_trace.csv
ablation_summary.csv
baseline_results_by_trace.csv
baseline_summary.csv
gcac_harness.py
trace_manifest.json
Current browse context:
cs.MA
new
|
recent
| 2026-09
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)