最新资讯
bloomberg.com Nvidia 加强东南亚芯片追踪以打击走私 thestack.technology 模型路由需求升温,Agent Router 推出开源替代方案 www.youtube.com Google DeepMind 的 Philipp Schmid:AI 同事需要具备的七个要素 unite.ai Cashfree 为 AI Agent 的托管结账加入 WebMCP 工具 dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 analyticsindiamag.com 小语言模型可能重塑企业 AI 部署方式 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

面向痴呆症护理的受治理AI智能体协调:架构、安全契约与证据驱动的工作流验证

原文 我的收藏

论文提出受治理闭环智能体协调(GCAC)架构,用于社区痴呆症护理工作流中有边界的智能体参与。该架构将护理协调失败证据与政策义务转化为可追踪系统需求,通过类型化事件-记忆-决策-行动-结果契约分离观察、受治理记忆、规划、确定性策略执行、执行与结果监控。参考测试台评估 18 条证据衍生轨迹,涵盖缺失记录、用药冲突、护理者报告、服务失败、同意变更、过期状态、重复事件、不可信文本及疑似急性神经变化。GCAC 满足全部 18 条契约判据,零策略违规工具调用,并正确保留义务、拒绝过期状态、创建人工交接并记录工作流关闭;事件阈值与无状态规划器对照分别满足 2/18 和 1/18 判据,组件消融将失败定位到被移除的记忆、策略或版本功能。作者指出结果确立的是架构一致性而非临床有效性,展示智能体系统可自动化对账、路由、文档与随访,同时保留人类对重大护理决策的权威。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,提出 GCAC 架构,将痴呆症护理协调失败证据转化为可追踪系统需求,通过类型化事件-记忆-决策-行动-结果契约分离观察、受治理记忆、规划、确定性策略执行、执行与结果监控。参考测试台评估 18 条证据衍生轨迹,覆盖缺失记录、用药冲突、护理者报告、服务失败、同意变更、过期状态、重复事件、不可信文本和疑似急性神经变化;GCAC 满足全部 18 条契约判据且零策略违规工具调用,事件阈值与无状态规划器对照分别满足 2/18 和 1/18,组件消融将失败定位到被移除的记忆、策略或版本功能。作者明确结果仅确立架构一致性而非临床有效性,并保留人类对重大护理决策的权威。局限在于仅为架构验证,无临床效果证据,且为预印本未经同行评审。

72

正文

Computer Science > Multiagent Systems arXiv:2609.25956 (cs) [Submitted on 22 Sep 2026] Title:Governed AI-Agent Coordination for Dementia Care: Architecture, Safety Contracts, and Evidence-Derived Workflow Verification Authors:Francesca Medda, Hui Gong View a PDF of the paper titled Governed AI-Agent Coordination for Dementia Care: Architecture, Safety Contracts, and Evidence-Derived Workflow Verification, by Francesca Medda and Hui Gong View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Dementia care increasingly involves connected sensors, medication devices, electronic records, and assistive technologies. Interoperability can transport observations but cannot maintain an accountable care state, reconcile evidence, determine who may act, or verify resolution. The shift from large language models to agentic engineering creates a systems opportunity: an external runtime can maintain memory across episodes, plan over goals and constraints, invoke tools, observe outcomes, and enforce governance. This paper presents Governed Closed-loop Agent Coordination (GCAC), an architecture for bounded agent participation in community dementia-care workflows. Evidence on care-coordination failures and policy obligations is translated into traceable system requirements. GCAC separates observation, governed memory, planning, deterministic policy enforcement, execution, and outcome monitoring through a typed event-memory-decision-action-outcome contract. A reference harness evaluates 18 evidence-derived traces covering missing records, medication conflict, caregiver reports, service failure, consent change, stale state, duplicate events, untrusted text, and suspected acute neurological change. GCAC satisfies all 18 contract oracles with zero policy-violating tool calls and correctly preserves obligations, rejects stale state, creates human hand-offs, and records workflow closure. Event-threshold and stateless-planner controls satisfy 2/18 and 1/18 oracles, respectively. Component ablations localise failures to the removed memory, policy, or versioning function. The results establish architectural conformance rather than clinical effectiveness and show how agentic systems can automate reconciliation, routing, documentation, and follow-up while preserving human authority over consequential care decisions. Comments: Subjects: Multiagent Systems (cs.MA) Cite as: arXiv:2609.25956 [cs.MA] (or arXiv:2609.25956v1 [cs.MA] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.25956 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Hui Gong [view email] [v1] Tue, 22 Sep 2026 10:09:01 UTC (31 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Governed AI-Agent Coordination for Dementia Care: Architecture, Safety Contracts, and Evidence-Derived Workflow Verification, by Francesca Medda and Hui Gong View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Ancillary-file links: Ancillary files (details): ablation_results_by_trace.csv ablation_summary.csv baseline_results_by_trace.csv baseline_summary.csv gcac_harness.py trace_manifest.json Current browse context: cs.MA new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容