最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

大语言模型中的自我指涉:递归自我改进的内省阈值

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 论文类比冯·诺依曼自复制自动机的复杂度阈值,提出 LLM 可持续递归自我改进需要“内省”能力,即系统模拟自身运算并定向修改的能力。作者基于 Kleene 第二递归定理论证此类内省程序在理论上存在,但综述现有证据认为当前 LLM 仅具备准内省(如部分元认知),受限于缺乏完整自访问、Transformer 的前馈特性以及阻止不动点迭代的计算类约束,尚未达到真正内省。文末给出跨越该复杂度阈值的架构路径并讨论相关安全影响。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,理论论证清晰:以 Kleene 第二递归定理证明内省程序的理论存在性,并指出当前 LLM 因缺乏完整自访问、Transformer 前馈结构和计算类约束而仅具准内省,未达真正内省。属概念性/理论性工作,无实验验证,结论为架构路径与安全影响的讨论,需保留其理论假设性质。

72

正文

Physics > Physics and Society arXiv:2607.04277 (physics) [Submitted on 5 Jul 2026 (v1), last revised 18 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:Self-Reference in Large Language Models: The Introspection Threshold for Recursive Self-Improvement Authors:Jiang Zhang, Bing Yuan, Qian Zhang View a PDF of the paper titled Self-Reference in Large Language Models: The Introspection Threshold for Recursive Self-Improvement, by Jiang Zhang and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The pursuit of self-evolving AI raises a critical question: when is autonomous self-improvement sustainable rather than degenerative? Drawing an analogy to von Neumann's complexity threshold for self-reproducing automata, we argue that sustainable recursive self-improvement in Large Language Models (LLMs) requires a functional analogue: introspection -- the system's capacity to simulate its own operations and target modifications. Grounded in Kleene's Second Recursion Theorem, we demonstrate the theoretical existence of such introspective programs. However, an empirical review reveals that while current LLMs exhibit quasi-introspection (e.g., partial metacognition), they fall short of true introspection due to structural bottlenecks: a lack of complete self-access, the feedforward nature of the Transformer, and computational class constraints that prevent fixed-point iteration. We conclude by outlining architectural paths to cross this complexity threshold and discussing the associated safety implications. Comments: Subjects: Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) MSC classes: 68T99 ACM classes: I.2.2; I.2.4 Cite as: arXiv:2607.04277 [physics.soc-ph] (or arXiv:2607.04277v2 [physics.soc-ph] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.04277 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Bing Yuan [view email] [v1] Sun, 5 Jul 2026 12:40:52 UTC (15,447 KB) [v2] Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:22:36 UTC (16,178 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Self-Reference in Large Language Models: The Introspection Threshold for Recursive Self-Improvement, by Jiang Zhang and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: physics.soc-ph new | recent | 2026-07 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI physics References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容