最新资讯
reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 bloomberg.com AI 抛售蔓延至信用市场,软银领跌亚洲美元债 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露
多元动态
登录 注册
行业动态 garymarcus.substack.com · @Gary Marcus

Gary Marcus批评黄仁勋无证据宣称AGI已到来

原文 我的收藏

Gary Marcus发文批评黄仁勋在无定义、无证据的情况下宣称AGI已到来,认为这是企业试图以权威取代科学讨论,并指出Astra在基准测试中并未显著超越前代。

AI推荐理由 Gary Marcus对黄仁勋的AGI声明提出批评,强调缺乏定义和证据。来源为个人博客,但作者是知名AI学者,观点有深度。对理解AGI争议有参考价值。

65

正文

几小时前,黄仁勋宣称通往AGI的竞赛已经结束。不幸的是,黄仁勋没有给出任何证据和定义,在我看来,这像是试图通过企业命令来接管一个科学问题。我敦促他阅读由Hendrycks、Yoshua Bengio及许多其他人(包括我自己)撰写的agidefinition.AI,并考虑Astra在我与Brundage的10项赌注中列出的那类例子上的表现如何。自动形式化可能终于触手可及,也许(?)可靠的编程也能实现;我怀疑Astra能否命中其他八项中的任何一项。按照传统定义,Astra仍然有所欠缺。在没有定义的情况下宣布胜利只会混淆视听。§ 除了缺乏定义之外,我预计如果Astra真的是AGI,它应该会遥遥领先于竞争对手。相反,许多人认为它在实际应用中并不比Fable 5.1强多少:而且一套备受推崇的基准测试表明,Astra确实有真正的改进,但并未显著偏离趋势。当真正的AGI到来时,我们不需要眯着眼睛看。我们也不需要黄仁勋的认可。到那时,结果会不言自明。立即订阅 更新:一位读者指出ARC-AGI测试是一个标准。以下是ARC发明者对此的说法:更新二:尽管黄仁勋今天祝贺了OpenAI,但大约六个月前,在Astra之前,他已经就一个早期模型宣布了胜利。
查看原文(中文正文为 AI 翻译)
A couple hours ago Jensen Huang declared that the race to AGI is over. Unfortunately, Huang gave no evidence and no definitions, which feels to me like an effort at a takeover of a scientific question by corporate fiat. I would urge him to read agidefinition.AI by Hendrycks, Yoshua Bengio & many others (including myself), and to consider how Astra is doing on the kinds of examples I laid out in my 10 -item bet with Brundage. Autoformalization may finally be in reach, and maybe (?) reliable coding; I doubt that Astra will have hit any of the other eight. By conventional definitions, Astra still falls short. Declaring victory without a definition simply muddies the waters. § Aside from the lack of definitions, I would expect that if Astra really were AGI, it would be a quantum leap ahead of its competitors. Instead, many see it as not much more than on a par with Fable 5.1 in real-world applications: And one well-respected set of benchmarks suggests that Astra is a genuine improvement but not significantly off-trend. When real AGI arrives, we won’t need to squint our eyes. And we won’t need Jensen’s approval, either. The results, at that point, will speak for themselves. Subscribe now Update: One reader pointed to the ARC-AGI test as a criterion. Here’s what the inventor of ARC said about this: Update two: Although Jensen congratulated OpenAI today, about six months he already declared victory, pre-Astra, with respect to an earlier model.

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容