AI推荐理由针对企业 AI 评测中“按模型标识符打分”的测量误差提出 IB2 协议,包含 gold-blind 能力绑定预检、含失败样本的可靠性评分规则和结构性盲审裁决,并给出 128 个锁定任务、987 条断言及 11 个系统的实验结果。具体发现包括:同一权重两次单路由运行在最终绑定门上失败不同谓词、七个套件中四个在六系统区间内饱和、服务臂选择使某声明版本与精度从 77.38 变为 82.54(配对区间 [0.11,10.60])、排除失败响应会改变排序。对 AI 评测方法论和 Agent/企业落地有实际参考价值,但语料密封、结论依赖自建评测器,需谨慎看待。
74
正文
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2609.10494v1 (cs)
[Submitted on 9 Sep 2026]
Title:IBIB: A Protocol for Measuring Enterprise AI Systems by Serving Route, Not Model Identifier
Authors:Blake Stenstrom, Charangan Vasantharajan, Brian Sathianathan
View a PDF of the paper titled IBIB: A Protocol for Measuring Enterprise AI Systems by Serving Route, Not Model Identifier, by Blake Stenstrom and 2 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Enterprises deploy systems, not checkpoints. Usable capability depends jointly on weights, serving route, precision, output contract, and harness, yet all 18 audited benchmarks score advertised model identifiers. We treat this as measurement error and give a protocol that makes it reportable. It has three parts. A gold-blind capability-binding preflight verifies that a route can execute the evaluation contract before any task reaches it; a reliability-inclusive first-pass scoring rule keeps failure in the score while keeping unsupported capability out; and adjudication is structurally score-blind. We call the protocol IB2 and release its algorithms, classification tables, request contract, and manifest schemas. Its reference instantiation, 128 locked tasks and 987 assertions over document, spreadsheet, chart, tool and database work, stays sealed: the procedure is the artifact, not the corpus. Across eleven systems, four results. Capability availability is measurable: two complete single-route runs on identical weights later failed distinct predicates of the finalized binding gate, while a third passed that gate before a fresh run. The advertised identifier exposed neither limit. Discrimination is not uniform: four of seven suites saturate under a six-system band, with the spread almost entirely from governed database work and multi-tab joins, so we report interval-backed resolution groups, not ranks; two of the nominal five-label output's four cuts fail multiplicity adjustment. Serving-arm choice moved one declared revision and precision from 77.38 to 82.54, paired interval [0.11,10.60], though the arms differ in access mode, harness generation, and the serving tool-call parser, and harness generation is a property of our evaluator, not any endpoint. Excluding failed responses from denominators changes the point ordering, so reliability inclusion changes a conclusion, not its wording.
Comments:
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as:
arXiv:2609.10494 [cs.CL]
(or
arXiv:2609.10494v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.10494
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Charangan Vasantharajan [view email]
[v1]
Wed, 9 Sep 2026 17:31:29 UTC (1,008 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled IBIB: A Protocol for Measuring Enterprise AI Systems by Serving Route, Not Model Identifier, by Blake Stenstrom and 2 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
new
|
recent
| 2026-09
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.LG
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)