最新资讯
dev.to 你的 Agent Harness 应具备的 17 项能力 dev.to 离线 AI 记忆中 0.8 余弦阈值为何失效 dev.to Kimi K3.1 Pro 开放权重:自托管 2.8T 模型前的开发者清单 dev.to 如何通过工具调用引导模型以提升 Harness 质量 dev.to AI Agent 审计轨迹不等于对话记录 dev.to 精简 MCP server 工具数量:更少工具、更小影响面,双重收益 dev.to 为什么 git checkout 无法撤销 AI 编码 agent 的改动? wechat AI短剧门槛降降降!实测即梦短剧工作室:剧本分镜预演一条龙,伙伴计划长期护航 dev.to 让模型改写文档前,先量化事实保真度 dev.to 回放 153 个 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话,审计 Agent 的生产影响范围 dev.to 银行 77 意图分类最便宜 LLM:GPT-6.1 Terra 每次成功任务 $0.000727 theinformation.com Chesky的副业:Airbnb向CEO新设AI实验室出售IP
多元动态
登录 注册
论文研究 arxiv.org ·

如何想象、想象什么?统一多模态模型跨视角空间推理中的视觉思维

原文 我的收藏

该论文研究统一多模态模型(UMM)在跨视角空间推理中“用图像思考”失效的问题:现有模型生成的中间思维图像中的视觉证据大多未被答案预测利用。作者提出训练期干预 View Dropout(VDrop),在答案段隐藏部分输入视角、但让思维图像 token 仍可见,从而激励模型依赖思维图像作答;随后以“可学习性—信息量”(L-I)权衡比较 top-down、panoramic、point-matching 三种思维图像渲染方式。在合成场景训练、五个真实域外基准评测中,panoramic 视觉思维配合 VDrop 是唯一同时具备信息量与可学习性的配置,域外泛化最佳。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 正式论文(v2,2026-09-14 修订),来源可信、摘要信息密度高。核心新信息:针对统一多模态模型(UMM)的跨视角空间推理,提出训练期干预 View Dropout(VDrop),在答案段隐藏部分输入视角但保留给 thinking-image token,从而迫使模型真正利用中间思维图像;并以 Learnability-Informativeness 权衡比较 top-down、panoramic、point-matching 三种思维图像渲染,结论是 panoramic + VDrop 在五个真实域外基准上同时具备信息量与可学习性、泛化最好。局限:仅在合成场景训练,评测为域外基准,摘要未给出具体数值与消融细节,实际效果需看全文验证。

78

正文

Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition arXiv:2605.27310 (cs) [Submitted on 26 May 2026 (v1), last revised 14 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:How and What to Imagine? Visual Thinking in Unified Multimodal Models for Cross-View Spatial Reasoning Authors:Qian Yang, Ankur Sikarwar, Huy Le, Le Zhang, Zhuan Shi, Perouz Taslakian, Aishwarya Agrawal View a PDF of the paper titled How and What to Imagine? Visual Thinking in Unified Multimodal Models for Cross-View Spatial Reasoning, by Qian Yang and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Cross-view spatial reasoning remains a weak spot for vision-language models (VLMs): they reason in language and discard the fine-grained geometry the task requires. Thinking with images aims to fix this by generating an intermediate thinking-image, but recent work shows the visual evidence in these traces is largely ignored. We therefore ask how to make visual thinking matter, and what kind of visual thinking works best. We ask these questions for unified multimodal models (UMMs) that natively support interleaved image-text generation. For the how, we propose View Dropout (VDrop), a training-time intervention that hides parts of one input view from the answer span while leaving it visible to the thinking-image tokens. This incentivizes the model to make use of the thinking-image when answering, rather than answering based on the input views only. With the thinking-image now being used in answer prediction, we ask which kind of visual thinking works best. We frame this as a Learnability-Informativeness (L-I) tradeoff and compare three thinking-image variants: top-down, panoramic, and point-matching renderings. Trained on synthetic scenes and evaluated on five real-world out-of-domain benchmarks, panoramic visual thinking with VDrop is the only configuration that is simultaneously informative and learnable, and achieves the best out-of-domain generalization. Comments: Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) Cite as: arXiv:2605.27310 [cs.CV] (or arXiv:2605.27310v2 [cs.CV] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27310 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Qian Yang [view email] [v1] Tue, 26 May 2026 17:20:05 UTC (20,031 KB) [v2] Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:22:13 UTC (20,250 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled How and What to Imagine? Visual Thinking in Unified Multimodal Models for Cross-View Spatial Reasoning, by Qian Yang and 6 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CV new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容