最新资讯
wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露 dev.to 你的 Agent Harness 应具备的 17 项能力 dev.to 离线 AI 记忆中 0.8 余弦阈值为何失效 dev.to Kimi K3.1 Pro 开放权重:自托管 2.8T 模型前的开发者清单 dev.to 如何通过工具调用引导模型以提升 Harness 质量 dev.to AI Agent 审计轨迹不等于对话记录 dev.to 精简 MCP server 工具数量:更少工具、更小影响面,双重收益 dev.to 为什么 git checkout 无法撤销 AI 编码 agent 的改动? wechat AI短剧门槛降降降!实测即梦短剧工作室:剧本分镜预演一条龙,伙伴计划长期护航 dev.to 让模型改写文档前,先量化事实保真度
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

大语言模型安全知识缺口的半自动化检测

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出一种半自动化方法评估 LLM 在特定安全领域的知识水平:以消费者保护机构(CPA)的权威信息为基准,通过检测模型回答的不稳定性来指示知识缺口。作者在身份盗用和冒充诈骗两个主题上,使用 6 家 CPA 的公开信息,对 Gemini 和 GPT 两个模型家族的 5 个模型进行演示,结果显示该方法能区分知识充足与不足的模型。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(cs.CR/cs.AI/cs.HC),作者与提交历史明确,方法描述具体:利用消费者保护机构(CPA)的权威信息,通过 LLM 回答的不稳定性来半自动识别安全知识缺口,并在身份盗用与冒充诈骗两个主题、Gemini 与 GPT 两个模型家族的 5 个模型上做了演示。属于可复现的评测方法学贡献,对 LLM 安全评测有实际参考价值;局限是仅覆盖两个安全主题、依赖 CPA 公开信息,摘要未给出量化结果,且为预印本未经同行评审。

72

正文

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security arXiv:2607.18496 (cs) [Submitted on 20 Jul 2026 (v1), last revised 22 Sep 2026 (this version, v4)] Title:Semi-Automated Detection of Gaps in LLM Security Knowledge Authors:Shufan Chai, Liangliang Sun, Jessica Staddon View a PDF of the paper titled Semi-Automated Detection of Gaps in LLM Security Knowledge, by Shufan Chai and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for a range of software, hardware and human-centered security tasks. Consequently, LLM performance on security tasks is an active area of measurement and research, often with a focus on identifying areas in which LLM security "knowledge" may be insufficient. Popular strategies for identifying LLM security knowledge gaps include building corpora of challenge questions or task benchmarks, strategies that require substantial manual work and security expertise to design and execute. We introduce a partially-automated method for assessing LLM knowledge of a security area. The method uses authoritative information from Consumer Protection Agencies (CPAs) to identify instability in LLM responses that can be indicative of knowledge gaps. We demonstrate the method for 2 security topics, identity theft and impostor scams, and 5 LLMs in 2 leading LLM families, Gemini and GPT, using publicly available information about identity theft and impostor scams from 6 CPAs. The method distinguishes between models that have and don't have sufficient knowledge to accurately identify the security topics in text narratives. Comments: Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) Cite as: arXiv:2607.18496 [cs.CR] (or arXiv:2607.18496v4 [cs.CR] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.18496 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Jessica Staddon [view email] [v1] Mon, 20 Jul 2026 20:37:37 UTC (1,003 KB) [v2] Wed, 22 Jul 2026 19:09:23 UTC (693 KB) [v3] Wed, 29 Jul 2026 16:59:29 UTC (693 KB) [v4] Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:55:40 UTC (694 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Semi-Automated Detection of Gaps in LLM Security Knowledge, by Shufan Chai and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CR new | recent | 2026-07 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.HC References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

aihot::arXiv - LLM 大语言模型安全知识缺口的半自动化检测 09-23 · 原文发布
← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容