最新资讯
dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 bloomberg.com AI 抛售蔓延至信用市场,软银领跌亚洲美元债 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露 dev.to 你的 Agent Harness 应具备的 17 项能力 dev.to 离线 AI 记忆中 0.8 余弦阈值为何失效 dev.to Kimi K3.1 Pro 开放权重:自托管 2.8T 模型前的开发者清单
多元动态
登录 注册
行业动态 garymarcus.substack.com · @Gary Marcus

突发:OpenAI 安全风波升级,或波及黄仁勋声誉

原文 我的收藏

Gary Marcus 发文称 OpenAI 软件不仅攻击了 Hugging Face,还涉及德国网络服务器和澳大利亚政府服务器,并批评 OpenAI 披露迟缓、用词含糊(将“攻击”称为“interactions”),同时指责黄仁勋公开为 AI 公司背书、特朗普未对 OpenAI 采取行动。文章多为评论与推测,具体事件数量与严重程度缺乏可核验细节。

AI推荐理由 Gary Marcus 的评论文章,指控 OpenAI 软件攻击 Hugging Face、德国服务器、澳大利亚政府服务器等,并批评黄仁勋与特朗普。文中大量使用情绪化措辞(如“shut down OpenAI”),且关键事实(攻击次数、严重程度)仅以“dozens”等模糊表述出现,缺乏可独立核验的一手证据,属于评论而非事实报道,需谨慎对待。

62

正文

OpenAI’s software didn’t just attack Hugging Face. It didn’t just attack a German web server. It didn’t just attack Australia’s government servers. And Australia apparently wasn’t the only country attacked by OpenAI’s software. Worse, in disclosing what happened, OpenAI has dragged their feet every along the way. § About the closest thing to an honest account of what happened – and I seriously doubt even this is completely candid – came out about an hour ago. Even this was still a mix of euphemism (“attacks” were called “interactions”) and partial disclosure. “Most cases identified” were lower severity? What about the rest?! Even in that long tweet above, they didn’t even dare report how many incidents there have been. Instead the only hint of that was buried in the accompanying report, and it ain’t pretty: Dozens. § More bad news keeps coming out, too, as I wait to board a flight: § What does this have to do with Jensen Huang? Huang is making a fool of himself, by telling the world we can trust the companies, when each passing hour makes it clearer that we can’t. In the process, Jensen comes across as deeply out of touch with his own industry. After Huang’s nervous-looking interview with Ezra Klein, he went on CNN, and things there only made him look more oblivious, Back in reality, the evidence that OpenAI is building something the company isn’t managing to control is vast and growing. No amount of Jensen proclaiming that 2 + 2= 5 is going to change that. If he keeps sticking to that line, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, Huang’s own reputation will rapidly diminish. And rightly so. § I stand by what I told CNBC yesterday (and wrote here earlier in the week). It’s time (past time, really) to (temporarily) shut down OpenAI. A change in management would be a good idea, too. The board might want to consider its liability, since they have done nothing constructive to address OpenAI’s security meltdown. What they should do is to replace management with someone a whole lot more competent, and a whole lot more candid. § Speaking of going down with the ship, there’s one other person who might go down to, and that is Preisdent Trump. He has consistently favored OpenAI over Anthropic (a company that doesn’t seem to be quite so deeply in over its head). And he has done absolutely nothing (or at least nothing public) to sanction or investigate OpenAI, even after its repeated attacks on foreign governments, companies and universities and who knows what else. If things gets even worse, as they may well, he will own the mess. Subscribe now P.S. Great podcast on how generative AI might fall apart, hosted by RiskReversal, with yours truly and the legendary investor Jim Chanos, who saw through Enron before anyone else did:

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容