最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

通过结构化知识树在 LLM 驱动的侦探游戏中强制叙事可靠性与认知节奏

原文 我的收藏

论文提出结构化知识树架构配合三智能体 LLM 流水线,将知识检索、对话生成与回复校验分离,使虚拟嫌疑人仅披露当前叙事状态允许的信息。在可玩侦探游戏测试床 The Interrogation of Adrian Gale 上评估,报告关键幻觉减少 64.78% 并完全阻止过早叙事披露,但严格机械约束带来强制对话披露的可用性权衡。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文,作者提出结构化知识树加三智能体流水线(知识检索、对话生成、回复校验分离),用于侦探游戏审讯对话,控制虚拟嫌疑人只披露当前叙事状态允许的信息。摘要给出可验证量化结果:关键幻觉减少 64.78%,并完全阻止过早叙事披露;同时承认严格机械约束带来可用性权衡(强制对话披露)。新信息在于用结构化知识树约束 LLM 非确定性输出、实现认知节奏控制,对 LLM 游戏叙事与可控生成有参考价值;局限是仅在单一自建测试床 The Interrogation of Adrian Gale 上评估,未提供跨场景泛化证据。

72

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.23043 (cs) [Submitted on 19 Sep 2026] Title:Enforcing Narrative Reliability and Epistemic Pacing in LLM-Driven Detective Games via Structured Knowledge Trees Authors:Parsa Rahmati, Richard Zhao View a PDF of the paper titled Enforcing Narrative Reliability and Epistemic Pacing in LLM-Driven Detective Games via Structured Knowledge Trees, by Parsa Rahmati and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) enable open-ended dialogue in interactive games, but their non-deterministic outputs make it difficult to preserve authorial control, factual consistency, and the intended sequence of information disclosure. These challenges are particularly significant in detective games, where premature revelation or fabricated details can undermine the logic of player progression. We present a Structured Knowledge Tree architecture coupled with a tri-agent LLM pipeline for controlling dialogue in an open-ended interrogation game. The system separates knowledge retrieval, dialogue generation, and response verification to ensure that the virtual suspect reveals only information permitted by the current narrative state. We evaluate the approach through The Interrogation of Adrian Gale, a playable detective-game testbed, and a formal user study examining hallucination reduction, adherence to authored disclosure sequences, and perceived logical progression. Our results demonstrate that the structured architecture reduces critical hallucinations by 64.78% and entirely prevents premature narrative disclosure. While the strict mechanical constraints introduced usability trade-offs regarding forced conversational reveals, the system successfully enforces rigorous epistemic pacing and provides players with a clear, subjective sense of progression toward solving the case. Comments: Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2609.23043 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.23043v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.23043 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Richard Zhao [view email] [v1] Sat, 19 Sep 2026 14:18:47 UTC (3,893 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Enforcing Narrative Reliability and Epistemic Pacing in LLM-Driven Detective Games via Structured Knowledge Trees, by Parsa Rahmati and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容