大模型
全球精选 ·
@Hayden Field
Anthropic遭集体诉讼：用户指控订阅计划误导
一群Claude订阅用户对Anthropic提起集体诉讼，称其Max订阅层级存在欺骗性广告，误导用户对服务限制的认知。诉讼由前FTC律师提起，是罕见的针对AI公司的法律行动。Anthropic此前曾表示优先考虑重度用户，甚至因此切断其他应用。
AI推荐理由 Anthropic面临集体诉讼，用户指控其Max订阅计划存在误导性宣传。报道涉及法律和商业问题，对AI行业有一定参考价值，但非技术突破。
65
正文
Anthropic表示，重度用户是其业务的关键——即使这意味着切断其他流行应用（如OpenClaw）的接入，它也优先考虑这些用户。但其中一些客户表示，Anthropic误导他们，让他们相信顶级定价订阅能获得比实际更多的服务。在今天提起的扩大版集体诉讼中，一群Claude订阅者称，该公司欺骗性地宣传其Max订阅层的限制。该诉讼由律师Monica Vaca和Kati Daffan提起，两人都曾在Lina Khan领导下的联邦贸易委员会工作。这是一次罕见的尝试，旨在对AI公司进行法律处罚……在The Verge阅读完整报道。
查看原文（中文正文为 AI 翻译）
Anthropic says power users are key to its business - it's prioritized them even when it means cutting off other popular applications, like OpenClaw. But some of these same customers say Anthropic misled them into believing they'd get more out of a top-tier pricing subscription than they did. In an expanded class action lawsuit filed today, a group of Claude subscribers say the company deceptively advertised the limits of its Max subscription tier. The lawsuit was brought by attorneys Monica Vaca and Kati Daffan, who both formerly worked at the Federal Trade Commission under Lina Khan. It's a rare attempt to legally penalize AI companies fo … Read the full story at The Verge.