最新资讯
dev.to 你的 Agent Harness 应具备的 17 项能力 dev.to 离线 AI 记忆中 0.8 余弦阈值为何失效 dev.to Kimi K3.1 Pro 开放权重:自托管 2.8T 模型前的开发者清单 dev.to 如何通过工具调用引导模型以提升 Harness 质量 dev.to AI Agent 审计轨迹不等于对话记录 dev.to 精简 MCP server 工具数量:更少工具、更小影响面,双重收益 dev.to 为什么 git checkout 无法撤销 AI 编码 agent 的改动? wechat AI短剧门槛降降降!实测即梦短剧工作室:剧本分镜预演一条龙,伙伴计划长期护航 dev.to 让模型改写文档前,先量化事实保真度 dev.to 回放 153 个 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话,审计 Agent 的生产影响范围 dev.to 银行 77 意图分类最便宜 LLM:GPT-6.1 Terra 每次成功任务 $0.000727 theinformation.com Chesky的副业:Airbnb向CEO新设AI实验室出售IP
多元动态
登录 注册
行业动态 techxplore.com ·

'安全查询空间'让AI修复SQL错误而无需重来

原文 我的收藏

研究人员提出'安全查询空间'方法,使AI系统在查询数据库出错时能局部修复,而无需重新生成整个SQL查询。该方法有望提高AI数据库交互的效率和准确性。

AI推荐理由 介绍了一种'安全查询空间'方法,让AI修复SQL错误而无需从头开始,对数据库查询优化有实际价值,技术细节具体。

75

正文

September 4, 2026 'Safe query space' lets AI fix SQL errors without starting over by The Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) edited by Sadie Harley, reviewed by Robert Egan Sadie Harley Scientific Editor Meet our editorial team Behind our editorial process Robert Egan Senior Editor Meet our editorial team Behind our editorial process Editors' notes This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: fact-checked trusted source proofread The GIST Add as preferred source Comparison of the SQL error correction processes used by conventional methods and SafeQL. Credit: KAIST "Find the best-selling product from last year." When an AI system attempts to answer a question like this by querying a company database, even a single reference to a nonexistent item can cause the query to fail. Until now, correcting such an error often required regenerating the entire SQL query from scratch. A research team led by Professor Min-Soo Kim from the School of Computing has developed SafeQL, a technology that instead identifies and fixes only the erroneous part. The technology is expected to make AI-powered data retrieval faster and more accurate, accelerating the adoption of AI work assistants in enterprise environments. The findings were presented at the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), held in Boston, U.S., from Sept. 1–5. Text-to-SQL technology enables AI systems to convert everyday questions, such as "Which product saw the largest increase in sales last year?" or "Which items are running low in stock?" into SQL queries. This allows users to retrieve sales, customer and inventory data using natural language without having to understand complex database commands. However, AI systems can make mistakes when generating SQL. For example, they may refer to a table or column that does not exist or join tables incorrectly. These errors can prevent the query from running and leave the AI unable to retrieve the requested data. SafeQL's efficient SQL search process using pruning. Credit: KAIST Rewriting one word at a time Conventional correction methods send the database error back to a large language model (LLM) and ask it to regenerate the entire query. This is similar to rewriting an entire report to correct a single word. In the process, parts that were already correct may be altered, new errors may be introduced, and repeated calls to the LLM increase both cost and processing time. SafeQL takes a different approach. Instead of discarding and regenerating the entire query after an execution failure, it interprets feedback from the database management system to precisely locate the faulty component, such as a relation, attribute, function or value. It then incrementally repairs that component while preserving the valid structure and logic of the original query. To achieve this, the research team developed a "safe query space" approach. Among the candidate corrections that can be executed on the database, SafeQL searches for the one closest to the query originally generated by the AI. The system prioritizes the most promising candidates and filters out unsuitable ones in advance, reducing the time required for correction. The team implemented SafeQL as a PostgreSQL extension and integrated it with the database system's parser, binder and type analyzer. This enables SafeQL to precisely locate errors even in complex SQL queries. The system calls the LLM again when search-based refinement cannot resolve the error within a predefined threshold, thereby reducing unnecessary AI use. Benchmark gains and enterprise use The research team evaluated SafeQL using BIRD and Spider, two widely used benchmarks for assessing the database querying capabilities of AI systems. On the BIRD benchmark, SafeQL resolved execution errors in up to 87.4% of initially erroneous SQL queries and improved execution accuracy by up to 5.8 percentage points over the unrefined baseline. Compared with regenerating the entire query, SafeQL reduced token use by a factor of up to 15.1 and refinement latency by a factor of up to 29.6. SafeQL is expected to be particularly useful for enterprises that handle large volumes of data requests. If an error occurs while an AI system is searching internal sales, customer or inventory data, SafeQL can repair only the affected part instead of regenerating the entire query. This can reduce the cost and time required to operate enterprise AI systems and support reliable work automation powered by AI agents and corporate data. Professor Kim said, "For AI to perform real-world tasks in enterprise environments, it must be able to accurately retrieve the data it needs." He added, "When AI makes an error during a database search, SafeQL fixes only the affected part instead of starting over from scratch. By reducing errors, costs and processing time, we expect the technology to accelerate reliable AI-powered work automation." Geonho Lee, a Ph.D. student in the KAIST School of Computing, participated in the study as first author, with Professor Kim serving as corresponding author. More information Geonho Lee et al, SafeQL: Search-based Refinement for Safe and Efficient LLM-based Text-to-SQL, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment (2026). DOI: 10.14778/3819518.3819545 SafeQL: safeql.dev/ Provided by The Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) Who's behind this story? Sadie Harley BSc Life Sciences & Ecology. Microbiology lab background with pharmaceutical news experience in oil, gas, and renewable industries. Full profile → Robert Egan Bachelor's in mathematical biology, Master's in creative writing. Well-traveled with unique perspectives on science and language. Full profile → Citation: 'Safe query space' lets AI fix SQL errors without starting over (2026, September 4) retrieved 8 September 2026 from https://techxplore.com/news/2026-09-safe-query-space-ai-sql.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only. Next-generation database reduces AI hallucinations and improves accuracy by 78% Jun 19, 2026 AI fixes 'temporal errors,' enhancing reliability in medical and legal fields Apr 14, 2026 Researchers introduce generative AI to analyze complex tabular data Jul 8, 2024 Researchers develop a next-generation graph-relational database system Sep 8, 2025 New system efficiently explains AI judgments in real-time Dec 12, 2025 New AI model can help prevent damaging and costly data breaches Nov 8, 2022 Memristor chip breaks the capacity limit of brain-inspired associative memory 5 hours ago Invention may bring smart bionic eye into sight 4 hours ago Whole-body expansion and contraction make a robot seem more alive 6 hours ago A tiny crystal tilt may bring greener magnetic memory closer to everyday devices 6 hours ago Tracking energy flow reveals voltage pattern that slashes waste heat by over 60% 8 hours ago Editorial proposes limits on generative AI's role in scientific research 12 hours ago

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

rss::News on AI/ML - TechXplore '安全查询空间'让AI修复SQL错误而无需重来 09-04 · 原文发布
← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容