最新资讯
stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

揭秘大语言模型交互中的隐私-效用权衡

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 预印本系统分析 LLM 交互中隐私清洗对下游性能的影响,提出三种机制:上下文依赖效用(依据用户意图判断何时清洗)、策略性适配(依据任务对事实完整性还是结构一致性的依赖决定删除或替换)、组合交互(属性间存在协同依赖或冗余对抗)。基于此提出意图驱动的本地保护框架,蒸馏轻量模型 Veilmind-4B 驱动动态的提取-清洗-恢复流水线,声称在低泄漏隐私点下保持高于现有隐私基线的响应效用,将隐私-效用权衡推向 Pareto 前沿。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,作者与摘要信息完整,事实明确、信息密度较高,属可验证的研究工作。论文系统拆解 LLM 交互中的隐私-效用权衡,提出上下文依赖效用、策略性适配、组合交互三种机制,并给出意图驱动的本地保护框架与轻量模型 Veilmind-4B,对隐私保护与 LLM 应用落地有参考价值。局限在于仅为预印本,摘要未提供具体实验数据与对比结果,Pareto 前沿等结论尚待同行评审验证。

72

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.10992 (cs) [Submitted on 10 Sep 2026 (v1), last revised 11 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions Authors:Zhenhua Liu, Zhanxu Xie, Junjie Yu, Tong Zhu, Lijun Li, Wenliang Chen View a PDF of the paper titled Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions, by Zhenhua Liu and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) Cite as: arXiv:2609.10992 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.10992v2 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.10992 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Zhenhua Liu [view email] [v1] Thu, 10 Sep 2026 02:12:51 UTC (896 KB) [v2] Fri, 11 Sep 2026 09:30:30 UTC (896 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions, by Zhenhua Liu and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.CR References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

aihot::arXiv - LLM 揭秘大语言模型交互中的隐私-效用权衡 09-14 · 原文发布
← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容