最新资讯
stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

隐式和显式人口统计信号在基于大语言模型的学生评估中的作用

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 论文研究学生人口统计信息如何影响 LLM 评估。作者用受控提示区分显式(直接提及人口统计细节)与隐式(以对话历史作为信号)两种设置,在自动作文评分、形成性反馈和元语言问答三类任务上测试六个 SOTA 模型。结果显示模型会捕捉人口统计线索并相应改变评分、反馈与答案:显式提及教育水平时反馈可读性常被调整;隐式条件下则出现不可预测偏差,例如低教育水平回答在问答中获得更低情感分数。论文据此指出 LLM 在教育评估任务中存在人口统计敏感性。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(cs.CL/cs.AI/cs.CY),作者为 Donya Rooein、Luca Benedetto、Dirk Hovy,摘要明确给出实验设计:用受控提示测试显式与隐式人口统计信号,覆盖自动作文评分、形成性反馈、元语言问答三类任务,测试六个 SOTA LLM。具体新信息是:显式提及教育水平时模型会调整反馈可读性;隐式条件下产生不可预测偏差,如低教育水平回答在问答中获得更低情感分数。局限是仅摘要级证据,未提供具体模型名单、样本量与偏差幅度,结论为人口统计敏感性存在,而非已量化的实际部署效果。

72

正文

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2609.16993 (cs) [Submitted on 15 Sep 2026] Title:The Role of Implicit and Explicit Demographic Signals in Large Language Model-based Student Assessment Authors:Donya Rooein, Luca Benedetto, Dirk Hovy View a PDF of the paper titled The Role of Implicit and Explicit Demographic Signals in Large Language Model-based Student Assessment, by Donya Rooein and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large Language Models are now common in student assessment, but we know little about how student demographics affect their use. Sometimes, considering student demographics may be necessary -- for example, to improve readability for users with lower educational levels. However, it also risks being a cause of discrimination, e.g., when assigning lower scores to students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. We set up controlled prompts to test 1) explicit demographic effects, where we mention demographic details directly, and 2) implicit effects, where we use conversation history as a demographic signal. We test these settings in three tasks: Automated Essay Scoring, Formative Feedback, and Metalinguistic Question Answering. We test six state-of-the-art LLMs on these tasks. In both explicit and implicit cases, the models pick up on demographic cues and can change their scoring, feedback, and answers accordingly. We find that LLMs frequently adjust the readability of feedback to education levels when these are explicitly mentioned. On the other hand, implicit conditions produce unpredictable biases, such as in question answering, where responses from lower-education levels receive lower sentiment scores. Our results provide clear evidence of demographic sensitivity in LLMs for educational assessment tasks. Comments: Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY) Cite as: arXiv:2609.16993 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.16993v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.16993 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Luca Benedetto [view email] [v1] Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:07:26 UTC (847 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled The Role of Implicit and Explicit Demographic Signals in Large Language Model-based Student Assessment, by Donya Rooein and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.CY References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容