最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

GRASP:基于智能体 AI 的生成、修订与评估战略规划框架

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 GRASP,一种策略感知的多阶段规划框架,将规划流程解耦为三个上下文隔离的模块:GenPlan 预编译全局宏观准则,RevPlan 在隔离上下文窗口中探索局部替代策略,VerPlan 用多准则判别器独立评估轨迹。作者报告在 Natural Plan Calendar Scheduling 上较直接 LLM 规划器提升约 12.4%,ZebraLogic 提升约 30.8%,SciBench Math 亦有提升;在多任务扩展场景下消除了标准规划器的性能崩溃,交错双任务环境绝对准确率最高提升 16.7%,并称比 GPT-5-mini 等前沿推理模型高 14.5%。上述结果均为作者自报,尚待独立验证。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 新提交论文(2026-09-24),提出 GRASP 多阶段智能体规划框架,将规划流程解耦为 GenPlan(生成宏观准则)、RevPlan(隔离上下文内探索局部策略)和 VerPlan(多准则判别器独立评估轨迹)。摘要给出具体量化结果:Natural Plan Calendar Scheduling 提升约 12.4%、ZebraLogic 约 30.8%、SciBench Math 亦有提升;多任务扩展下消除性能退化惩罚,交错双任务环境绝对准确率提升最高 16.7%,并称比 GPT-5-mini 等前沿推理模型高 14.5%。信息密度高、方法描述具体,但结果均为作者自报,尚无第三方复现或代码验证,且 arXiv 编号与日期较新,需谨慎看待。

78

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.30147 (cs) [Submitted on 24 Sep 2026] Title:GRASP: Generating, Revising, and Assessing for Strategic Planning with Agentic AI Authors:Arunabh Srivastava, Mohammad A. (Amir)Khojastepour, Srimat Chakradhar, Sennur Ulukus View a PDF of the paper titled GRASP: Generating, Revising, and Assessing for Strategic Planning with Agentic AI, by Arunabh Srivastava and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) typically exhibit a performance profile where reliability degrades as task complexity increases. We address the challenge of generating high-quality natural language executable plans for complex tasks by introducing $\textbf{GRASP}$, a strategy-aware, multi-stage planning framework. GRASP decouples the planning pipeline across specialized, context-isolated modules: it pre-compiles global macro-guidelines (GenPlan), explores alternative localized strategies within isolated context windows (RevPlan), and independently evaluates trajectories using a multi-criteria discriminator (VerPlan). Empirical evaluations show that GRASP consistently establishes a new state-of-the-art frontier across diverse datasets, yielding substantial accuracy gains over direct LLM planners on Natural Plan Calendar Scheduling ($\sim$12.4$\%$$\uparrow$), ZebraLogic ($\sim$30.8$\%$$\uparrow$), and SciBench Math. Crucially, under multi-task scaling-where standard planners suffer immediate performance collapse-GRASP completely flattens the multi-task degradation penalty. In interleaved dual-task environments, GRASP achieves an absolute accuracy gain of up to 16.7$\%$ over direct LLM planners. Furthermore, by isolating context and enforcing strict macro-regularization, GRASP outperforms frontier reasoning models (such as GPT-5-mini) by a margin of 14.5$\%$. Comments: Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA) Cite as: arXiv:2609.30147 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.30147v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30147 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Arunabh Srivastava [view email] [v1] Thu, 24 Sep 2026 17:11:35 UTC (195 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled GRASP: Generating, Revising, and Assessing for Strategic Planning with Agentic AI, by Arunabh Srivastava and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL cs.LG cs.MA References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容