最新资讯
stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

迈向缓解虚构共识:多智能体辩论综合的主动溯源门控

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 预印本针对多智能体辩论(MAD)系统最终综合阶段缺乏控制、易生成无辩论历史依据的“虚构共识”问题,提出 Active Provenance Gate(APG)事后验证层:将来源作为硬约束,分析辩论日志、审计每条主张并自纠错。作者称在危机模拟中自愈机制使数据溯源保真度提升一倍以上,严格门控会阻断无依据主张并生成分歧报告;人类研究中超过 75% 用户偏好明确说明失败的报告,尽管多数人认为基线系统的虚构共识更流畅。论文将数据溯源从被动日志推进到发布前的主动条件阻断。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,作者与摘要明确,提出 Active Provenance Gate(APG)作为多智能体辩论(MAD)综合阶段的事后验证层,将来源作为硬约束、逐条审计并自纠错。摘要给出危机模拟中 Provenance Fidelity 提升一倍以上、严格门控阻断无依据主张并生成分歧报告,以及人类研究中超过 75% 用户偏好明确失败报告的结果。局限:仅为预印本,未提供同行评审、代码或复现细节,效果数据来自作者自述的模拟与用户研究,需谨慎看待。

72

正文

Computer Science > Multiagent Systems arXiv:2609.31422 (cs) [Submitted on 25 Sep 2026] Title:Towards Mitigating Fabricated Consensus: The Active Provenance Gate for Multi-Agent Debate Synthesis Authors:Jakub Masłowski, Jarosław A. Chudziak View a PDF of the paper titled Towards Mitigating Fabricated Consensus: The Active Provenance Gate for Multi-Agent Debate Synthesis, by Jakub Mas{\l}owski and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large language model-based multi-agent debate (MAD) systems are being increasingly used as complex decision pipelines in distributed processes. However, their final synthesis phase still remains inadequately controlled. Even with detailed debate logs, summarizing models are prone to fabricating smoothly written debate consensus that is not grounded in the debate's history. To address this safety gap, this paper presents empirical research and studies if the introduction of active post-debate verification can mitigate the production of such factually unsupported summaries, while still providing valuable information. Furthermore, it is examined whether explicitly signalling divergence is preferable in the absence of a reliable compromise. The Active Provenance Gate (APG) is introduced as a post-debate verification layer that treats the source as a hard constraint, analysing the debate logs, auditing each claim, and applying self-correction. In crisis simulations, the self-healing mechanism more than doubles the average data Provenance Fidelity in difficult condition scenarios, before the strict gate blocks unsupported claims and generates divergence reports. In the human study, a vast majority of the users (over 75%) preferred a report explicitly stating failure in critical scenarios, despite most of them perceiving fabricated consensus from the baseline system as more fluent. Our main contribution is the transition of data origin tracing from passive logging to active conditional blocking before publication. Comments: Subjects: Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL) ACM classes: I.2.11; I.2.7 Cite as: arXiv:2609.31422 [cs.MA] (or arXiv:2609.31422v1 [cs.MA] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31422 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Jakub Masłowski [view email] [v1] Fri, 25 Sep 2026 15:44:18 UTC (638 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Towards Mitigating Fabricated Consensus: The Active Provenance Gate for Multi-Agent Debate Synthesis, by Jakub Mas{\l}owski and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.MA new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.CL References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容