最新资讯
dev.to 为 CI/CD 构建 AI 质量门禁 dev.to Kakao 发布面向 AI Agent 的决策模型 Kanana-2-v-decide computerworld.com Microsoft 对 Copilot Chat 企业用户扩大未公开的使用限制 pub.towardsai.net Google 发布 Gemini 4 Carbon:主打网络安全能力的前沿模型 gradientflow.com METR 研究:AI 正在加速构建 AI 的团队本身 www.infoq.com GitLab 19.5 将 Agentic 开发纳入 DevOps 平台的治理体系 aiacceleratorinstitute.com 研究:AI Agent 的复杂流程编排可能反而是问题所在 pub.towardsai.net MongoDB 推出 Vercel AI SDK 集成:为 AI 应用提供持久记忆 thenewstack.io Google 捐出被 Anthropic 和 OpenAI 使用的代码沙箱 gVisor,押注 AI Agent 基础设施开源 dev.to 在信任 AI 生成的测试用例前,如何逐条复核 unite.ai Franklin Templeton 构建 AI 研究工作流以揭示风险 techxplore.com AI 助力寻找更优的钛合金 3D 打印工艺参数
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org · @Alex Smola

MSI-Bench:评估协作式 AI Agent 的多说话人语音交互

原文 我的收藏

语音是 AI agent 自然且即时的交互界面,而会议、家庭和协作工作等许多适用场景本质上是多说话人的,这带来一对一交互中基本不存在的挑战。论文提出多说话人交互基准 MSI-Bench,每个测试用例是一段短的多方多轮音频场景,附带参与者上下文、期望的工具调用和原子评分标准。该基准针对三类能力:多说话人记忆、多说话人指令遵循和多说话人推理,共包含 1,152 个测试用例,中英文各 576 个。结果显示,各语言划分上最强配置仅分别通过英文 66.8% 和中文 54.5% 的全部评分项,最强开源权重配置为 34.0% 和 19.3%;失败分析将感知与推理问题区分开来。

AI推荐理由 提出多说话人语音交互基准 MSI-Bench,含 1,152 个中英各半的多方多轮音频场景,覆盖多说话人记忆、指令遵循与推理三类能力,并给出工具调用与原子评分标准。最强配置英文仅 66.8%、中文 54.5% 通过全部评分项,开源权重配置更低,量化揭示了当前语音 agent 在多说话人场景的明显短板,对评估与落地有参考价值。

76

正文

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2609.24812v1 (cs) [Submitted on 21 Sep 2026] Title:MSI-Bench: Evaluating Multi-Speaker Voice Interaction for Collaborative AI Agents Authors:Chenxu Xiong, Dongming Shen, Yuzhi Tang, Wentao Ma, Mu Li, Alex Smola View a PDF of the paper titled MSI-Bench: Evaluating Multi-Speaker Voice Interaction for Collaborative AI Agents, by Chenxu Xiong and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Voice provides a natural and immediate interface for AI agents. Many settings in which voice agents could be useful, including meetings, households, and collaborative work, are inherently multi-speaker. Supporting these settings introduces challenges that are largely absent from one-on-one interaction. We introduce the Multi-Speaker Interaction Benchmark (MSI-Bench) for evaluating multi-speaker voice interaction. Each test case is a short multi-party multi-turn audio scene with participant context, expected tool calls, and atomic rubrics. The benchmark targets three capability families: multi-speaker memory, multi-speaker instruction following, and multi-speaker reasoning. It comprises 1,152 test cases, evenly split between Mandarin Chinese and English (576 each). The strongest configuration on each split passes all rubrics on only 66.8% of English and 54.5% of Mandarin cases, and the strongest open-weight configuration on 34.0% and 19.3%. Failure analysis separates perception from reasoning: open-weight models are bottlenecked by the multi-speaker audio front-end, while frontier systems still fail speaker-scoped decision making on clean transcripts---and models across the board often respond when no one has addressed them. These results identify speaker-grounded perception, speaker-scoped decision making, and conversational restraint as concrete targets for future voice agents. Comments: Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2609.24812 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.24812v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.24812 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Chenxu Xiong [view email] [v1] Mon, 21 Sep 2026 16:04:26 UTC (1,856 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled MSI-Bench: Evaluating Multi-Speaker Voice Interaction for Collaborative AI Agents, by Chenxu Xiong and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容