大模型
arxiv.org ·
论匿名化对大型语言模型性能的影响
该论文系统实证研究了隐私与性能的权衡:在 11 个基准上对比 5 个主流语言模型在原始与假名化输入下的表现。结果显示匿名化总体降低性能,但影响因模型和任务而异——Qwen2.5-72B、GPT-4o mini 等更强模型降幅最大,TruthfulQA 反而改善,RGB 等检索任务急剧下降;保留实体唯一性的可逆匿名化明显优于 redaction,显式提示模型匿名化无可见收益。作者认为匿名化需与模型和任务协同设计。
AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文,作者与摘要明确,实验设计具体(5 个模型、11 个基准,对比原始与假名化输入)。核心新信息:匿名化普遍降低性能,但影响高度依赖任务与模型——能力更强的 Qwen2.5-72B 与 GPT-4o mini 降幅最大;TruthfulQA 反而提升,RGB 等检索类任务灾难性下降;保留实体唯一性的可逆匿名化显著优于 redaction,且显式提示模型匿名化无收益。局限:仅摘要,未提供具体数值与统计细节,结论需以全文验证。
78
正文
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2609.11335 (cs)
[Submitted on 10 Sep 2026]
Title:On the Impact of Anonymization on the Performance of Large Language Models
Authors:Tobias Deußer, Max Hahnbück, Lorenz Sparrenberg, Tobias Uelwer, Christian Bauckhage, Rafet Sifa
View a PDF of the paper titled On the Impact of Anonymization on the Performance of Large Language Models, by Tobias Deu{\ss}er and 5 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:As large language models are increasingly deployed in sensitive domains, anonymizing input data to protect personally identifiable information has become a critical practice. However, the impact of this anonymization on model utility is not well understood. This paper presents a systematic empirical study of the trade-off between privacy and performance. We evaluate five prominent language models across eleven diverse benchmarks, comparing their performance on original versus pseudonymized inputs. Our results reveal that while anonymization generally degrades performance, the effect is highly nuanced. We find that more capable models, such as Qwen2.5-72B and GPT-4o mini, suffer the largest performance drops, suggesting a stronger reliance on specific entity information. The impact is also task-dependent: performance on TruthfulQA improves with anonymization, while retrieval-focused tasks like RGB experience a catastrophic decline. Further experiments show that reversible anonymization techniques that preserve entity uniqueness significantly outperform irreversible ones like redaction, and that explicitly prompting models about anonymization offers no discernible benefit. We conclude that anonymization is not a one-size-fits-all solution and must be co-designed with the model and task in mind to balance privacy and utility effectively. Our findings provide a crucial baseline for developing more robust, privacy-aware AI systems.
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as:
arXiv:2609.11335 [cs.CL]
(or
arXiv:2609.11335v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.11335
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Tobias Deußer [view email]
[v1]
Thu, 10 Sep 2026 10:12:36 UTC (111 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled On the Impact of Anonymization on the Performance of Large Language Models, by Tobias Deu{\ss}er and 5 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
new
|
recent
| 2026-09
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)