最新资讯
reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者 techcrunch.com Palo Alto Networks 洽谈以 5 亿美元收购 AI Agent 安全初创公司 Clutch theinformation.com 黄仁勋被要求就涉华间谍指控向国会作简报 www.infoq.com Edera 推出 Object Capability Bounded Authority,试图将凭证与 AI Agent 工作负载隔离 wechat 这波杀疯了!旗舰级模型不限量、1个月视频额度免费领 bloomberg.com AI 抛售蔓延至信用市场,软银领跌亚洲美元债 dev.to 如何在专用 GPU 服务器上用 OpenAI 兼容 API 部署 LLM dev.to 审计 153 份 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话记录:User-Agent 与 URL 中的邮箱泄露
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

相同文本,不同数字:基于 LLM 的测量指标的分歧

原文 我的收藏

该论文考察 LLM 文本测量对模型选择的敏感性:用 7 个不同厂商的 LLM 对 S&P 500 财报电话会议记录计算 13 个指标(情感、管理层清晰度、不确定性、回答具体性、气候与政治风险等)。结果显示跨模型排名相关性平均仅 0.52,转录本层面跨厂商共同差异仅占总分数变异的 34%;跨模型分歧无法预测后续分析师或市场分歧,提示存在显著的模型特异成分而非底层披露的共同模糊性。模型选择会显著改变下游推断的系数大小、符号与统计显著性;跨厂商平均可提升多数构念的排名稳定性,但分数水平仍受纳入模型影响。作者建议将 LLM 生成变量视为模型依赖的测量并跨厂商验证。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文,方法明确:用 7 个不同厂商的 LLM 对 S&P 500 财报电话会议记录按 13 个文本指标(情感、管理层清晰度、不确定性、回答具体性、气候与政治风险等)打分,发现跨模型排名相关性平均仅 0.52,且转录本层面跨厂商共同差异只占总分数变异的 34%;跨模型分歧不能预测后续分析师或市场分歧,说明存在显著的模型特异成分;模型选择会显著影响下游回归系数的量级、符号与显著性;跨厂商平均可提高多数构念的排名稳定性,但分数水平仍对纳入哪些模型敏感。结论是 LLM 生成的变量应视为模型依赖的测量并跨厂商验证。对使用 LLM 做文本量化研究、金融 NLP 与评测的开发者有直接方法论价值,局限是仅覆盖财报电话会议这一语料与 13 个构念,未给出跨领域外推证据。

78

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.31013 (cs) [Submitted on 25 Sep 2026] Title:Same Text, Different Numbers: The Divergence of LLM-Based Measures Authors:Hamid Boustanifar, Sasan Mansouri View a PDF of the paper titled Same Text, Different Numbers: The Divergence of LLM-Based Measures, by Hamid Boustanifar and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Researchers increasingly use generative large language models (LLMs) to convert corporate text into empirical variables. We examine the extent to which LLM-based textual measures are invariant to model choice using thirteen measures, including sentiment, management clarity, uncertainty, answer specificity, and climate and political risk. Seven LLMs from different providers score earnings call transcripts of S&P 500 companies on these constructs. Cross-model rank correlations average only 0.52, and transcript-level differences common across providers account for only 34% of total score variation. Cross-model disagreement does not predict subsequent analyst or market disagreement, consistent with a substantial model-specific component rather than common ambiguity in the underlying disclosure. Model choice significantly affects downstream inference, with coefficient magnitudes, signs, and statistical significance varying substantially across models. Averaging across providers makes transcript rankings more stable for most constructs, but score levels remain sensitive to the models included in the ensemble. LLM-generated variables should therefore be treated as model-contingent measurements and validated across providers. Comments: Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); General Finance (q-fin.GN); Risk Management (q-fin.RM) Cite as: arXiv:2609.31013 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.31013v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31013 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Sasan Mansouri [view email] [v1] Fri, 25 Sep 2026 09:04:10 UTC (6,962 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Same Text, Different Numbers: The Divergence of LLM-Based Measures, by Hamid Boustanifar and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL q-fin q-fin.GN q-fin.RM References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容