最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
行业动态 x.com · @a16z (@a16z)

Databricks CEO 提出 AI 自我改进的四个必要条件

原文 我的收藏

Databricks CEO Ali Ghodsi 在 a16z 对话中表示,AI 真正实现自我改进需同时满足四个条件:下一代模型训练所需资源更少、训练时间更短、模型智能水平提升,且这三项可反复叠加。他称 Databricks 约九成软件已由 AI 编写,但这与递归自我改进不同,并认为即使满足四条件也未必通向超级智能。

AI推荐理由 Databricks CEO Ali Ghodsi 在 a16z 播客中提出 AI 自我改进需同时满足四个条件:下一代模型训练资源更少、训练时间更短、智能水平提升,且三者可反复叠加;他同时指出 Databricks 约九成软件已由 AI 编写,但这不等于递归自我改进,并质疑该路径未必通向超级智能。内容为从业者观点而非新研究或产品发布,无量化证据,属概念讨论;对理解 AI 自我改进叙事有参考价值,但信息密度和时效性一般。

62 浏览 68,751 点赞 171 评论 27 转发 12

正文

Ali Ghodsi of @Databricks on the four conditions that would have to hold for AI to truly improve itself: "The next model requires less resources, less GPUs to train... The second condition: the next model takes less time to train as well. Third, accuracy of the model, the intelligence is increasing. And fourth, we can do the former three again and again and again... All at the same time, not just any of them." "If you just mean that the software is writing itself, we're already there today. Like 90-some percent of the software in Databricks is written by AI. Does it matter if the last few percent is also written by AI? No." "If you're getting these four conditions, then you might get a speed-up where the next model, let's say, takes half amount of time and half the resources, and it is more intelligent... By the way, I don't even know if that necessarily leads you to superintelligence." "A lot of people, their definition is just, 'Hey, if I'm not even coding anymore and it's coding itself'... I think they're conflating, 'Hey, what's my value and is it scary for me?' Versus, 'Hey, that then means we'll get that superintelligence that in 2014 was hypothesized by Bostrom.'" @alighodsi @martin_casado @sarah_wang

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容