大模型
dev.to ·
@Sayed Sayeedur Rahman
新页面被 ChatGPT 或 Claude 引用需要多久？
SEO 从业者引用 Searchable 对 4000 多篇新文章 60 天的追踪数据：ChatGPT 首次引用中位时间为 3.5 天，Claude 为 9.5 天；在 60 天内被 ChatGPT 引用的文章中 26% 在第一天即被引用；仅 19% 的文章在 60 天内获得任一引擎引用。作者强调 3.5 天中位数只描述已被引用的文章，两个月未被引用是样本中最常见结果。
AI推荐理由 基于 Searchable 对 4000+ 新文章的 60 天追踪，给出 ChatGPT 首次引用中位 3.5 天、Claude 9.5 天、仅 19% 在 60 天内被引用等具体数字，对 AI 搜索可见性有参考价值；但样本来源、统计口径和第三方数据未在片段中说明，且作者为 SEO 从业者，结论需谨慎看待。
62
正文
As an SEO specialist and co-founder of @TechLookBD, clients ask me this all the time. Searchable tracked more than 4,000 new articles for 60 days to answer it, and the results changed how I reply.
ChatGPT’s median time to first citation was 3.5 days. Of the articles ChatGPT cited within 60 days, 26% were cited on day one.
Claude’s median was 9.5 days, 2.7 times longer.
When both engines cited the same article, ChatGPT arrived first 72% of the time.
The number I keep coming back to is 19%. Only 19% of articles received a citation from either engine within 60 days. Roughly four in five got nothing in the window.
So here is how I now frame timelines. The 3.5-day median describes articles ChatGPT cited. Not every new page should expect a citation within days. Going two months uncited was the most common outcome in the sample, and by itself this does not point to a technical problem with your page.
Marketers face two separate questions: how long a citation takes, and how likely your content is to earn one at all. Set expectations on both before you promise results from AI search.
Next, I want to see whether articles cited early keep getting cited more often, or whether the early advantage fades.
What are you seeing with your own content?