最新资讯
dev.to 为 CI/CD 构建 AI 质量门禁 dev.to Kakao 发布面向 AI Agent 的决策模型 Kanana-2-v-decide computerworld.com Microsoft 对 Copilot Chat 企业用户扩大未公开的使用限制 pub.towardsai.net Google 发布 Gemini 4 Carbon:主打网络安全能力的前沿模型 gradientflow.com METR 研究:AI 正在加速构建 AI 的团队本身 www.infoq.com GitLab 19.5 将 Agentic 开发纳入 DevOps 平台的治理体系 aiacceleratorinstitute.com 研究:AI Agent 的复杂流程编排可能反而是问题所在 pub.towardsai.net MongoDB 推出 Vercel AI SDK 集成:为 AI 应用提供持久记忆 thenewstack.io Google 捐出被 Anthropic 和 OpenAI 使用的代码沙箱 gVisor,押注 AI Agent 基础设施开源 dev.to 在信任 AI 生成的测试用例前,如何逐条复核 unite.ai Franklin Templeton 构建 AI 研究工作流以揭示风险 techxplore.com AI 助力寻找更优的钛合金 3D 打印工艺参数
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

交易大厅中的传染:对抗性信号如何在多智能体交易系统中传播

原文 我的收藏

该论文研究基于 LLM 的多智能体交易系统对对抗输入的鲁棒性,提出 GMATS 框架,模拟仅通过合规社交媒体信息流进入的黑盒投毒攻击,并定义信念偏移分数与回测指标攻击-干净差值等传染度量。在安全离线基准上的实验表明,简单的输入型攻击即可显著恶化风险收益特征、大幅降低 Sharpe 比率;同时发现合理设计的多智能体拓扑与协调者提示可在相同投毒预算下抑制对抗冲击、提升平均鲁棒性。论文已被 ECML PKDD 2026 收录。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文,作者与摘要明确,且已被 ECML PKDD 2026 收录,来源可信、信息密度高。核心新信息是提出 GMATS 框架,研究仅通过社交媒体信息流注入的黑盒对抗信号如何在 LLM 多智能体交易系统中传播,并定义信念偏移与回测指标攻击-干净差值等传染度量;实验显示简单输入型攻击即可显著降低 Sharpe 比率,而特定多智能体拓扑与协调者提示可缓解冲击。局限在于实验基于安全离线基准与历史数据,未涉及真实市场部署,结论为基准内表现而非实盘效果。

78

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.19789 (cs) [Submitted on 17 Sep 2026] Title:Contagion on the Trading Floor: How Adversarial Signals Spread in Multi-Agent Trading Systems Authors:Qi Rong Sua, Junhao Dong, Nguyen Duc Thai, Yuqing Wen, Cheston Tan, Yew-Soon Ong View a PDF of the paper titled Contagion on the Trading Floor: How Adversarial Signals Spread in Multi-Agent Trading Systems, by Qi Rong Sua and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Multi-agent trading systems built on large language models (LLMs) are beginning to appear in quantitative finance, yet their robustness to adversarial inputs is largely unknown. We study the vulnerability of LLM trading stacks to black-box, input-only attacks that enter solely via admissible social-media feeds. We introduce the Generic Multi-Agent Trading System (GMATS), a framework that captures modern multiagent trading architectures and instantiate a class of black-box poisoning attackers that treat an LLM as a post generator and inject budget-constrained, plausibly benign social-media content into the analyst's evidence stream. We define contagion metrics that trace how adversarial content propagates through the stack, including belief-shift scores at analyst and coordinator layers and attack-clean deltas on standard backtest metrics. Experiments on a safe offline benchmark with historical market and social data show that even simple input-only attackers can materially degrade risk-return profiles, sharply reducing Sharpe ratios. At the same time, we find that suitably designed multi-agent topologies and coordinator prompts can dampen adversarial shocks and improve average robustness under identical poisoning budgets. Comments: Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.19789 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.19789v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19789 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Journal reference: Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Research Track, ECML PKDD 2026, LNCS 16946, Springer (2027) 206-223 Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-37673-2_12 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources Submission history From: Qi Rong Sua [view email] [v1] Thu, 17 Sep 2026 06:54:59 UTC (1,845 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Contagion on the Trading Floor: How Adversarial Signals Spread in Multi-Agent Trading Systems, by Qi Rong Sua and 4 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容