大模型
arxiv.org ·
SCICONVBENCH:面向计算科学任务表述的多轮澄清大语言模型基准测试
该论文提出 SCICONVBENCH 基准,用于评估 LLM 在计算科学任务表述中的多轮澄清能力,覆盖流体力学、固体力学、材料科学和偏微分方程四个领域,聚焦两类能力:eliciting 缺失信息(消歧)与检测并修正内部矛盾请求(不一致修正)。基准结合结构化任务本体与基于评分标准的评估框架,从澄清行为、对话接地和最终规格保真度三个维度衡量模型表现。结果显示,前沿模型在不一致修正上表现相对较好,但最佳模型在流体力学消歧案例中仅解决 52.7%;研究还发现前沿 LLM 常做出未与用户对话接地的静默假设和隐式规格修补。代码与数据已公开。
AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(v2,2026-09-17 修订),提出 SCICONVBENCH 基准,覆盖流体力学、固体力学、材料科学和 PDE 四个计算科学领域,评估 LLM 在多轮澄清中的消歧与不一致修正能力,并给出具体量化结果:前沿模型在不一致修正上表现较好,但最佳模型在流体力学消歧任务上仅解决 52.7% 的案例,且常出现无对话依据的静默假设与隐式规格修补。新信息明确、可验证,对科学 AI 助手与 Agent 对话式任务表述研究有实际参考价值;局限是仅摘要级信息,未提供完整实验细节。
78
正文
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
arXiv:2605.18630 (cs)
[Submitted on 18 May 2026 (v1), last revised 17 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)]
Title:SCICONVBENCH: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn Clarification for Task Formulation in Computational Science
Authors:Nithin Somasekharan, Youssef Hassan, Shiyao Lin, Gihan Panapitiya, Patrick Emami, Anurag Acharya, Sameera Horawalavithana, Shaowu Pan
View a PDF of the paper titled SCICONVBENCH: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn Clarification for Task Formulation in Computational Science, by Nithin Somasekharan and 7 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as scientific AI as- sistants, and a growing body of benchmarks evaluates their capabilities across knowledge retrieval, reasoning, code generation, and tool use. These evaluations, however, typically assume the scientific problem is already well-posed, whereas practical scientific assistance often begins with an ill-posed user request that must be refined through dialogue before any computation, analysis, or experiment can be carried out reliably. We introduce SCICONVBENCH, a benchmark for multi- turn clarification in scientific task formulation across four computational science problem domains: fluid mechanics, solid mechanics, materials science, and par- tial differential equations (PDEs). SCICONVBENCH targets two complementary capabilities: eliciting missing information (disambiguation) and detecting and correcting erroneous requests containing internally contradictory information (in- consistency resolution). Our benchmark pairs a structured task ontology with a rubric-based evaluation framework, enabling systematic measurement of LLM per- formance across three dimensions: clarification behavior, conversational grounding, and final-specification fidelity. Current frontier models perform relatively well on inconsistency resolution, but even the best model resolves only 52.7% of the disambiguation cases in fluid mechanics. We further find that frontier LLMs fre- quently make silent assumptions and perform implicit specification repairs that are not grounded in the conversation with users. SCICONVBENCH establishes a foundation for evaluating the upstream conversational reasoning that a reliable computational science assistant requires. The code and data can be found at this https URL.
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph)
Cite as:
arXiv:2605.18630 [cs.AI]
(or
arXiv:2605.18630v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.18630
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Nithin Somasekharan [view email]
[v1]
Mon, 18 May 2026 16:34:45 UTC (4,950 KB)
[v2]
Thu, 17 Sep 2026 15:13:33 UTC (4,950 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled SCICONVBENCH: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn Clarification for Task Formulation in Computational Science, by Nithin Somasekharan and 7 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
new
|
recent
| 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs
physics
physics.comp-ph
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)