最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

SCICONVBENCH:面向计算科学任务表述的多轮澄清大语言模型基准测试

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 SCICONVBENCH 基准,用于评估 LLM 在计算科学任务表述中的多轮澄清能力,覆盖流体力学、固体力学、材料科学和偏微分方程四个领域,聚焦两类能力:eliciting 缺失信息(消歧)与检测并修正内部矛盾请求(不一致修正)。基准结合结构化任务本体与基于评分标准的评估框架,从澄清行为、对话接地和最终规格保真度三个维度衡量模型表现。结果显示,前沿模型在不一致修正上表现相对较好,但最佳模型在流体力学消歧案例中仅解决 52.7%;研究还发现前沿 LLM 常做出未与用户对话接地的静默假设和隐式规格修补。代码与数据已公开。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(v2,2026-09-17 修订),提出 SCICONVBENCH 基准,覆盖流体力学、固体力学、材料科学和 PDE 四个计算科学领域,评估 LLM 在多轮澄清中的消歧与不一致修正能力,并给出具体量化结果:前沿模型在不一致修正上表现较好,但最佳模型在流体力学消歧任务上仅解决 52.7% 的案例,且常出现无对话依据的静默假设与隐式规格修补。新信息明确、可验证,对科学 AI 助手与 Agent 对话式任务表述研究有实际参考价值;局限是仅摘要级信息,未提供完整实验细节。

78

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2605.18630 (cs) [Submitted on 18 May 2026 (v1), last revised 17 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:SCICONVBENCH: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn Clarification for Task Formulation in Computational Science Authors:Nithin Somasekharan, Youssef Hassan, Shiyao Lin, Gihan Panapitiya, Patrick Emami, Anurag Acharya, Sameera Horawalavithana, Shaowu Pan View a PDF of the paper titled SCICONVBENCH: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn Clarification for Task Formulation in Computational Science, by Nithin Somasekharan and 7 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as scientific AI as- sistants, and a growing body of benchmarks evaluates their capabilities across knowledge retrieval, reasoning, code generation, and tool use. These evaluations, however, typically assume the scientific problem is already well-posed, whereas practical scientific assistance often begins with an ill-posed user request that must be refined through dialogue before any computation, analysis, or experiment can be carried out reliably. We introduce SCICONVBENCH, a benchmark for multi- turn clarification in scientific task formulation across four computational science problem domains: fluid mechanics, solid mechanics, materials science, and par- tial differential equations (PDEs). SCICONVBENCH targets two complementary capabilities: eliciting missing information (disambiguation) and detecting and correcting erroneous requests containing internally contradictory information (in- consistency resolution). Our benchmark pairs a structured task ontology with a rubric-based evaluation framework, enabling systematic measurement of LLM per- formance across three dimensions: clarification behavior, conversational grounding, and final-specification fidelity. Current frontier models perform relatively well on inconsistency resolution, but even the best model resolves only 52.7% of the disambiguation cases in fluid mechanics. We further find that frontier LLMs fre- quently make silent assumptions and perform implicit specification repairs that are not grounded in the conversation with users. SCICONVBENCH establishes a foundation for evaluating the upstream conversational reasoning that a reliable computational science assistant requires. The code and data can be found at this https URL. Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph) Cite as: arXiv:2605.18630 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2605.18630v2 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.18630 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Nithin Somasekharan [view email] [v1] Mon, 18 May 2026 16:34:45 UTC (4,950 KB) [v2] Thu, 17 Sep 2026 15:13:33 UTC (4,950 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled SCICONVBENCH: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn Clarification for Task Formulation in Computational Science, by Nithin Somasekharan and 7 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-05 Change to browse by: cs physics physics.comp-ph References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容