AI编码
dev.to ·
@Dev Learning Tools
AI编程代理实战解析
作者分享使用Claude Code等终端代理构建网站的经验,展示从需求到部署的流程,并对比Claude Code、Codex CLI等工具,附常见错误总结。
AI推荐理由 以实际案例介绍AI编程代理的工作流程,并对比多个工具,但内容偏个人经验,深度有限。
60
正文
AI coding agents have moved past autocomplete: they can read an entire codebase, plan a multi-file change, write it, verify it, and ship it, mostly without step-by-step approval.
I wrote up how that actually looks day to day, since this exact site (devlearningtools.com) is built entirely through a terminal agent (Claude Code): request comes in as plain language, agent reads the existing code first, plans the change, writes it, verifies with a real build, then commits and confirms it's live.
Also compares Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Cursor, Copilot, and Windsurf, plus a Common Mistakes section from real experience.
Full writeup: https://www.devlearningtools.com/blog/ai-coding-agents-explained
Curious what everyone else's actual workflow looks like.