最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
智能体 arxiv.org ·

UltraG-Bench:评估大型视觉语言模型在超声像素级证据定位上的多任务基准

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 UltraG-Bench,一个面向超声像素级证据定位的大规模多任务基准,基于 40 个公开超声分割数据集、覆盖 13 个解剖类别构建,包含指令引导分割、证据定位 VQA 和证据定位报告生成三项递进任务,标注量分别为 331125、666779 和 138832。对 14 个先进模型的综合评测显示,语义理解与细粒度像素级定位之间存在显著差距。作者进一步提出 UltraG-Agent,将 VLM 的语义推理能力与超声专用分割模型 UltraSAM3 结合,实验表明其在语义预测和像素级视觉定位上均有明显提升。数据集与代码已公开。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 新论文,提出超声像素级证据定位基准 UltraG-Bench,整合 40 个公开超声分割数据集、13 个解剖类别,含指令引导分割、证据定位 VQA、证据定位报告生成三项递进任务,标注量分别为 331125、666779、138832;对 14 个 SOTA 模型的评测显示语义理解与像素级定位存在明显差距,并提出结合 VLM 语义推理与 UltraSAM3 分割能力的 UltraG-Agent。新信息具体、可验证,对医学 VLM 评测与 Agent 组合有参考价值;局限是仅基于摘要,未提供具体评测数值与复现细节,且属预印本未经同行评审。

72

正文

Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition arXiv:2609.30928 (cs) [Submitted on 25 Sep 2026] Title:UltraG-Bench: A Multi-task Benchmark for assessing Large Vision-Language Models on Pixel-level Evidence Grounding in Ultrasound Authors:Quanhao Zhu, Bo Xu, Rui Lin, Chenyuan Wang, Yu Shao, Boling Zhu, Jiuyan Sun, Liang Zhao, Hongfei Lin, Feng Xia View a PDF of the paper titled UltraG-Bench: A Multi-task Benchmark for assessing Large Vision-Language Models on Pixel-level Evidence Grounding in Ultrasound, by Quanhao Zhu and 9 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Ultrasound is one of the most widely used medical imaging modalities, and recent large vision-language models(VLMs) have shown increasing capabilities in ultrasound image understanding. However, these models fail to provide pixel-level visual evidence aligned with their semantic predictions, and their fine-grained grounding capability in ultrasound remains largely unclear. We introduce UltraG-Bench, a large-scale multi-task benchmark for evaluating pixel-level evidence grounding in ultrasound. UltraG-Bench is built by annotating 40 public ultrasound segmentation datasets spanning 13 anatomical categories, and comprises three progressive tasks: instruction-guided segmentation, evidence-grounded VQA, and evidence-grounded report generation, with 331125, 666779, and 138832 annotations, respectively. Comprehensive evaluation of 14 state-of-the-art models reveals a substantial gap between semantic understanding and fine-grained pixel-level localization. We further propose UltraG-Agent, which combines the semantic reasoning capabilities of a VLM with the ultrasound-specific segmentation capability of UltraSAM3. Experiments show that UltraG-Agent substantially improves both semantic prediction and pixel-level visual grounding. Our dataset and code are available at this https URL. Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2609.30928 [cs.CV] (or arXiv:2609.30928v1 [cs.CV] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30928 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Quanhao Zhu [view email] [v1] Fri, 25 Sep 2026 07:43:12 UTC (6,316 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled UltraG-Bench: A Multi-task Benchmark for assessing Large Vision-Language Models on Pixel-level Evidence Grounding in Ultrasound, by Quanhao Zhu and 9 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CV new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容