最新资讯
dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机 bloomberg.com Rightmove 与 Scout24 借 AI 产品应对低迷房市并上调展望 stackoverflow.blog 欢迎来到芯片时代:半导体制造、AI 数据中心与芯片设计的未来 www.youtube.com AI Agent 总犯同样的错:CentralAgent AI 将记忆重构为经验系统 pub.towardsai.net Netflix 科学家建议重采样 LLM 评判:5 次仅将误差棒缩小 13% pub.towardsai.net Jev 作为 LLM 前的静默层:构建提示感知的模型路由器 reddit.com OpenAI 称 Astra 仅满足 10% 安全任务标准 dev.to FreeToken:在自有 GPU 上运行前沿 MoE 模型及其内存需求 dev.to 当 AI Agent 说“完成”时,究竟完成了什么? dev.to 部署 Underdog Bark 3.0 Pro:逐字转写、自定义后端与分块设置 dev.to 为艰难对话构建 AI:五个 Agent、一条安全正则与一位盲评监督者
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

面向新型 AI 辅助教育问题的教学评估预训练模型评测

原文 我的收藏

该 arXiv 预印本评估传统机器学习、Transformer 与大语言模型在 Bloom 层级分类任务上的表现,重点关注 AI 生成教育问题带来的分布外(OOD)性能下降。基线结果显示 TF-IDF 机器学习模型 OOD Macro F1 仅 0.48,BERT 为 0.55,LLM 达 0.79;文本拼接将 ML 与 BERT 分别提升至 0.59 和 0.62,附加学习目标可提升特定数据集表现,模型重训练带来的改进最大。作者据此讨论预训练模型用于新型 AI 辅助教育问题的权衡及特征增强策略。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 预印本,摘要给出明确实验设置与量化结果(TF-IDF ML 在 OOD 上 Macro F1 0.48,BERT 0.55,LLM 0.79;文本拼接提升至 0.59/0.62),信息密度较高且可验证。但属小众教育评估任务,作者与机构无已知影响力,未提供代码或数据集链接,对 AI 模型/Agent/算力主线的直接价值有限,故兴趣分中等。

62

正文

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2609.27749 (cs) [Submitted on 23 Sep 2026] Title:Evaluation of pre-trained models for pedagogical assessment of novel AI-assisted educational questions Authors:Michael Lawrence Castanares, Princess Ventures, Allan Tan View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluation of pre-trained models for pedagogical assessment of novel AI-assisted educational questions, by Michael Lawrence Castanares and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:The surge in AI-assisted generation of educational materials has outpaced our capacity to validate their pedagogical quality. Automated evaluation using Bloom Classifier models is a promising approach to assess educational materials at scale. These models show high accuracy within-distribution dataset (IID Dataset). However, applying the same models to new out-of-distribution (OOD) datasets such as AI-assisted generated questions could show performance degradation. To identify robust classifiers under dataset shift, we evaluated traditional Machine Learning (ML), transformer, and Large Language models on the Bloom level classification task. We also explored feature-engineering strategies incorporating NLP metrics, appending the learning objectives as part of the input, and text splicing to stabilize OOD performance. Our baseline tests show that TFPOS-IDF ML models perform poorly on OOD (Macro F1-score 0.48) compared to BERT (0.55) and LLMs (0.79). Text splicing improved macro F1-score performance of ML and BERT models (0.59 and 0.62, respectively). Appending the learning objectives with the input increased model performance on specific dataset. Model retraining provided the largest improvement across models and datasets. Overall, these findings highlight the trade-off on the use of pre-trained models with novel AI-assisted educational questions and how strategic feature enhancements help address loss in performance. Comments: Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG) ACM classes: I.2.7; K.3.1 Cite as: arXiv:2609.27749 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2609.27749v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27749 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Allan Tan [view email] [v1] Wed, 23 Sep 2026 12:00:33 UTC (1,029 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluation of pre-trained models for pedagogical assessment of novel AI-assisted educational questions, by Michael Lawrence Castanares and 2 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.CL cs.LG References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容