行业动态
technologyreview.com ·
@MIT Technology Review Insights
用AI推动遗留系统现代化的理由
文章探讨了利用AI技术解决遗留系统现代化难题的潜力,但未提供具体实施细节或成功案例。
AI推荐理由 MIT Technology Review文章讨论AI在遗留系统现代化中的应用,但摘要未提供具体案例或数据,内容偏概念性。
60
正文
赞助内容
与印孚瑟斯合作
多年来,遗留技术一直是企业知道需要解决的问题,但往往难以应对。替换关键业务系统的成本、复杂性和风险可能使现代化感觉像是一种需要管理的干扰,而不是值得追求的机会。但随着客户期望的上升以及AI给软件开发经济学带来的变化,这种计算正在改变。Bupa对其My Bupa移动应用的现代化提供了一个案例研究,展示了当遗留迁移被视为业务转型而非技术重写时,可能实现什么。
Bupa健康保险首席信息官Asifa Sherazi描述了等待遗留系统成为紧急情况的危险:“生命周期结束的技术是一种风险,它悄然累积,然后一下子到来。”对于Bupa,将其应用从Xamarin迁移到原生Swift和Kotlin,将应用评分从3.7提高到4.7,而用户感知的崩溃率在Android上下降了近24个百分点,在iOS上下降了8个百分点。“他们会注意到的是,当他们需要我们时,往往在压力时刻,它只是简单地工作,”Sherazi说。
印孚瑟斯澳大利亚、新西兰和东南亚地区BFSI、医疗保健和公共部门高级副总裁兼区域负责人Sanjeev Tripathi认为,AI正在帮助改变这一等式。“AI的出现正在从根本上改变现代化的经济学,”他说,减少了传统上与这些项目相关的努力、风险和時間。在Bupa,将AI辅助逆向工程与正向工程相结合,帮助在比前AI时代可能的时间大约少60%的情况下交付了转型。
Sherazi和Tripathi还强调了现代化的人性维度:保留机构知识,给团队适应能力,并创造一个员工可以及早发现问题环境。
展望未来,两位专家都将现代化平台视为更个性化、预测性和AI驱动体验的基础。现代化的回报可能更少关于替换老化技术,而更多关于构建应对未来所需的灵活性。
“现代平台将成为更智能的AI驱动生态系统的基础,其中AI不仅仅是附加组件,而是从设计到运营都内置其中。这就是现代平台将如何演变,客户体验将变得更加个性化和预测性,”Tripathi说。对于Sherazi来说,这种转变已经在改变组织可以提出的问题:“过去是,我们的平台能支持吗?现在,是:这对我们的客户来说是正确的事情吗?”
本期Business Lab由印孚瑟斯合作制作。
完整文字记录:
Megan Tatum:来自《麻省理工科技评论》,我是Megan Tatum,这是Business Lab,一个帮助商业领袖理解从实验室进入市场的新技术的节目。
我们今天的主题是遗留现代化。各行业的公司继续努力将AI现代化带入遗留技术栈,增加了失去供应商支持、客户体验下降和创新受限的风险。
给你两个词:面向未来的基础。
我的嘉宾是Bupa健康保险首席信息官Asifa Sherazi,以及印孚瑟斯澳大利亚、新西兰和东南亚地区BFSI、医疗保健和公共部门高级副总裁兼区域负责人Sanjeev Tripathi。
本播客由印孚瑟斯联合制作。
欢迎,Asifa和Sanjeev。
Asifa Sherazi:谢谢,Megan。很高兴来到这里。
Sanjeev Tripathi:谢谢,Megan。很高兴来到这里。Asifa,很高兴再次与你交谈。
Megan:非常感谢两位的到来。Asifa,如果我能从你开始,为我们的对话设定背景。亚太地区有七百万医疗保健客户。你能告诉我们更多关于Bupa及其在现代化计划中面临的挑战吗?
Asifa:是的,当然。让我从Bupa的一些塑造我们所做一切的事情开始。我们是一家全球医疗保健组织。想想医院、诊所、牙科、老年护理、数字健康,以及我们的保险业务。我们重新投资于组织,因此投资于我们的服务、能力、团队以及我们为客户交付的结果。在亚太地区,我们服务大约,如你所说,七百万客户,涵盖健康保险和健康服务,个人、家庭、企业客户、患者。我们的宗旨,帮助人们活得更长、更健康、更幸福,不仅仅是一句声明。它实际上塑造了我们的战略,指导我们的投资决策,并影响我们团队每天做出的选择。
现在,对于我们大多数健康保险会员来说,与Bupa的日常数字关系始于My Bupa,我们的自助服务平台。它是管理保险范围、更新保单详情、提交索赔、检查权益的前门。与此同时,Blua扮演着补充角色。My Bupa帮助会员管理保险范围,Blua帮助他们管理健康、数字医疗保健服务、临床支持、预防性健康。它们一起让我们超越交易性互动,走向更个性化、主动的护理。
这是我们的挑战。我们的移动应用My Bupa基于Xamarin,微软对它的支持在2024年某个时候结束。我们有扩展支持,所以我们的客户在整个过程中都受到保护,但我们清醒地认识到这是一座桥梁,而不是目的地。跑道是有限的,对我们来说正在缩短。我们决定从稳定位置主动现代化,为了客户的长期安全和体验,而不是等到情况迫使我们出手,因为承载我们最重要的客户关系的平台实际上在静止,而周围的世界在移动。
Megan:对。所以你决定在这方面真正主动行动。那么,Asifa,坚持使用生命周期结束的技术有哪些风险,摆脱遗留技术将如何帮助你改善客户体验?
Asifa:是的。看,生命周期结束的技术是一种风险,它悄然累积,然后一下子到来。我们从三个方面看到了它。首先是安全和合规。一旦技术失去供应商支持,安全更新和修复的流动就会发生根本性变化。在我们的案例中,我们设置了扩展支持作为桥梁,所以客户保持受保护。但扩展支持为你赢得时间,它不会为你赢得未来。在医疗保健领域,我们持有一个人将与组织分享的一些最敏感的信息。对我们来说,那不是数据,而是信任。而信任的重建极其昂贵。我们不准备在缩短的跑道上冒这个风险。
第二是失去对自己路线图的控制。我如何解释这一点:iOS和Android不会静止。每一个操作系统发布,每一次应用商店要求的变化,都成为你反应而不是计划的事情。随着每一个让你进一步放慢,随着时间的推移,这会在客户期望和你实际能提供之间打开一个越来越大的差距。我们都是客户。我们不将健康保险公司与其他健康保险公司比较。我们与我们上次使用的任何应用比较。
第三点是,这也是我们想向同行指出的,是人才库的萎缩。Xamarin是遗留技术,可用的工程专业知识有限。你最终会有一个关键客户平台由越来越小的专家群体支持。这是穿着技术外衣的劳动力风险。我们与印孚瑟斯合作,将整个应用资产从Xamarin迁移到完全原生的Swift和Kotlin,客户结果是我们今天愿意谈论这个的原因。我们的应用评分从3.7上升到4.7。我想分享的一些统计数据是,用户感知的崩溃率在Android上下降了近24个百分点,在iOS上下降了8个百分点。Android每次访问的登录成功率翻倍回到77%,这是团队最自豪的一个,因为登录失败不是技术事件。这是一个想检查保险范围却无法做到的人。
团队在单次发布中实现了100%的功能对等,我们90%的活跃客户群转移到了新版本,我认为他们下载了近180万次独立下载。从我们客户的角度来看,客户永远不会把这视为技术变化,他们也不应该。他们会注意到的是,当他们需要我们时,往往在压力时刻,它只是简单地工作,这就是我们真正追求的结果。
Megan:这些是你分享的关于迁移成功的非常引人注目的结果和统计数据。我的意思是,Sanjeev,你能谈谈为什么此时现代化遗留技术如此关键,以及印孚瑟斯如何与Bupa一起处理这一转型旅程?
Sanjeev:当然,Megan。说实话,遗留现代化计划并不新鲜,一直有强烈的愿望在整个技术领域推动现代化。Asifa涵盖了我本来要涵盖的关于风险的所有要点。但我要重申,现实是行业一直被成本复杂性以及历史上任何遗留现代化计划所关联的风险所阻碍。
正如Asifa提到的,五到十年前可接受的客户期望现在根本不再可接受。今天的客户期望在每个渠道都有无缝、直观、响应迅速的互动。Asifa还涵盖了围绕安全、韧性、人才可用性等日益增长的挑战。在遗留技术上找到人才极其极其困难,这给每个组织和每个遗留平台都带来了风险,其中大多数实际上也是关键业务平台。安全漏洞越来越难以管理,而且正如我提到的,在较旧技术中找到深厚专业知识现在非常非常困难。
那么什么改变了?改变的是我们现在有新的工具可以解决这些挑战。AI的出现正在从根本上改变现代化的经济学,它通过帮助组织减少努力、风险以及传统上此类项目所需的时间来做到这一点,这就是为什么我们相信现在是遗留现代化的时候。事实上,在印孚瑟斯,我们在AI优先价值框架中确定了六个战略价值池,该框架是公开的,遗留现代化是这六个价值池之一。在市场上,我们看到客户群中有非常强烈的兴趣,他们认识到解锁技术和商业价值的机会就在现在。
特别是与Bupa,我们将这一旅程视为业务转型,而不仅仅是技术重写,我们的方法有两个关键阶段。一是逆向工程,然后是正向工程。让我快速介绍这两个是什么。
逆向工程,我们做的是提取并理解遗留环境中的规则、流程和逻辑,这是我们在任何遗留现代化计划中采取的标准方法。这使我们能够保留关键业务功能,但同时避免通常伴随大规模迁移计划的风险。
第二个方面是正向工程,我们重新架构了解决方案,以实现重新想象的客户体验。目标不仅仅是逐功能迁移或确保功能对等,这很重要,但更重要的是,既然我们投资这种资金来创建一个可扩展、可维护且能够支持未来创新的现代平台,这就是Asifa提到的你需要控制自己的路线图。你必须构建一个能够支持未来创新的平台。我们基本上确保没有在转换中丢失任何东西,我们显著提高了平台稳定性和长期可维护性。Asifa提到的一些指标也反映了客户体验的显著改善。
最后,在我结束这个问题之前还有一点是上市时间。我说过现在是时候,因为我们有现在可用工具的力量。AI让我们能够大幅加速转型。传统上漫长而复杂的现代化,在大约比前AI时代少60%的时间内交付,这才是真正的故事。
Megan:所以在这种背景下,AI在经济学、速度以及你谈论的所有这些方面是真正的推动者。如果我能回到你,Asifa,尽管现代化是一个技术挑战,但也有人的因素,我想知道你能谈谈你如何让员工为这些新技术做好准备,以及你在这方面面临的挑战和解决方案吗?
Asifa:人的一面是我真正热衷的。技术只是挑战的一半。真正的工作是帮助人们从他们知道的走向可能的。现代化不仅仅是替换系统,它是给团队信心、能力、清晰度去拥抱不同的未来,这才是决定变化是否真正成功的关键。
从那次经历中,有三个突出的人性挑战。第一个是过渡双方专业知识的稀缺,就像我们之前说的,Xamarin是一个遗留应用。我们正在远离一个遗留技术,由迅速缩小的专家人才池支持,并现代化到两个原生平台。现有环境的文档有限。许多运营知识存在于个人经验和代码库本身,这造成了对少数人的真正依赖。对团队来说,这是一个令人面对的现实,也是一个有力的提醒,现代化不仅仅是技术必要性,它实际上是韧性问题。
改变动态的是使用AI进行考古。正如Sanjeev提到的,印孚瑟斯应用AI辅助逆向工程来收集遗留Xamarin代码,提取流程、规则、业务逻辑,并从中生成原生就绪的用户故事和验收标准。团队做了大量工作。他们将近1,500个回归场景映射到原生史诗,这样,关键旅程的对等性通过设计而非记忆得以保留。人的影响同样重要。知识不再存在于少数人手中,而是成为团队共享,我们的人可以花更少精力保持机构记忆,更多精力设计和改进。所以这是第一个挑战。
第二个挑战,Megan,是容量而不是意愿。我们的业务分析师完全致力于持续的功能交付。这是一个活的面向客户的应用,你不能在重建底层的同时暂停改善客户体验。AI驱动的发现和文档记录节省了估计近400小时的手动BA工作,这不是一个人员编制故事,这实际上是人们不被要求同时做两份全职工作。
突出的第三个挑战是速度。我们最初的内部估计大约是18个月,感谢Sanjeev和团队,几乎像一种团队方法,我们如何解决这个问题,团队在七个月内交付了,这令人振奋。
这也要求很高,两件事都需要大声说出来。我们动员了跨职能团队,涵盖工程、架构、测试、发布,因为管理并行环境同时保护BAU承诺既是情感负担也是后勤负担。我们与团队一起努力,亲临现场而不是远程报告,定期检查,真诚倾听担忧,快速解除障碍,这样人们就不会坐着等待决定。Megan,我要说的一件事是,当你将18个月压缩到7个月时,领导层能做的最有用的事情是移除别人面前的摩擦,然后让开。
但产生最大差异的事情实际上出奇简单。我们构建了转型旅程的视觉描绘,每月更新,这样团队可以实际看到他们走了多远。因为当你深入这种规模的迁移时,很容易只看到剩下要做的事情,而能够回顾已经覆盖的地面给了人们真正的意图和真正的动力。而且,看着团队的自豪感成为他们的燃料,确实令人振奋。
Megan:我喜欢这个令人振奋但疲惫的想法。我认为这是一个很好的描述。
Asifa:是的。对我们所有人的领导力教训比任何都简单。这样的项目有艰难的几周,会有事件、延迟、困难的对话。Sanjeev,你和我有过很多次这样的对话。领导力在这些时刻的工作是吸收模糊性而不是传递焦虑,因为如果人们觉得告诉你坏消息是安全的,那么几乎没有什么你不能修复的。我直说,因为这是
这是整个项目中最真实的一点。我为这个团队感到无比自豪,因为他们在七个月内取得的成就,同时每天不间断地为客户提供服务,确实非常了不起。但我真正自豪的不是速度,也不是工程本身,而是团队从未忘记为谁而做,所以我们做的每一个决定,他们回来时,最终都回归到应用另一端的那个人。
梅根:听起来你们在关注人员因素和技术方面都做得非常出色,这非常重要。桑吉夫,我们已经听到了保柏在这方面取得的一些惊人成果,但更广泛地说,我想,纵观现代化用例,您发现公司在哪些方面获得了最大的投资回报率,您对那些需要在遗留系统层面专注于转型的领导者有什么建议?
桑吉夫:谢谢,梅根。这是一个非常重要且实际上非常好的问题,因为我们看到现代化的投资回报率有时被过于狭隘地仅从技术角度看待,正如阿西法提到的,它比技术更广泛。遗留系统现代化也有与业务影响相关的方面,所以我将简要介绍这一点。
正如我所提到的,有两个维度。一个是技术投资回报率或与技术相关的投资回报率,第二个是业务投资回报率。在技术方面,正如您也从阿西法那里听到的,最大的好处来自更快的上市时间、平台稳定性和弹性,当然,在很多情况下,实际上几乎在所有情况下,运营成本更低,这是与一些遗留系统现代化项目相关的方面之一。
除此之外,还能接触到更广泛、更容易获得的人才库,安全管理,确保平台安全,并尽可能在当前环境中免受漏洞影响。同时,更容易创新,发布变得更快,因此功能交付到市场的速度更快,并且能够响应任何新的技术创新。但这只是在技术方面。
然而,在业务方面,回报通常反映在客户成果上,我们通常看到的是净推荐值等指标的改善,在这种情况下,例如,您在应用商店看到的应用程序评分。这两者实际上都是客户满意度和数字体验质量的非常有力的指标。我认为我们必须从技术和业务角度来审视投资回报率,但更重要的是从业务角度。
您问题的第二部分是关于我对领导者的建议,我认为阿西法已经很好地涵盖了这一点,她提到了团队一体化的方法,为团队提供安全的环境,让他们能够说出哪些进展顺利,哪些不顺利,并始终关注最终结果。我认为这些都是非常重要的事情。但我也想补充一点,不要将现代化视为一项技术举措。这是一个独特的机会,让我们重新思考业务平台本身,而不是追求一对一的迁移,利用您所做的投资来改善客户体验、简化流程,并重新架构以支持实时个性化和数据驱动决策等能力。当技术转型直接与业务成果挂钩时,回报最大。
最后,这是我多次亲身经历的事情,您必须从第一性原理出发思考。人工智能不会取代良好的工程实践。它使组织能够更快地执行这些实践,并且更快,但也更一致、更大规模。良好架构、扎实工程和明确业务目标的基础将继续保持重要,事实上,随着我们的进步,它们的重要性将会增加。我认为,这就是我要对任何开始遗留系统现代化项目的人说的重点。
梅根:我喜欢这个想法,这不仅仅是迁移。正如您所说,这是一个重新构想您能交付什么以及什么是可能的机会。太棒了。让我们以展望未来作为结束。阿西法,您期待哪些在此前不可能实现的创新,您看到了什么前景?
阿西法:肯定有很多事情在酝酿中。但最让我们兴奋的不是特定技术,而是我们对话中的问题已经改变。过去是,我们的平台能支持吗?现在,这是否是对客户正确的事情?这是一个深刻的转变。
有三件事,梅根,以前确实不可能实现,我们之前已经稍微提到过,桑吉夫也提到了。首先是速度作为一种永久能力。自发布以来,Android和iOS团队已经发布了多个快速迭代版本,包括我们迁移到新的支付网关。构建现在完成速度快了四倍,代码大约在一小时内到达测试人员手中,我们减少了30%的代码库,应用程序占用空间也减少了18%。更精简的系统不再是审美偏好,而是让下一次变更变得便宜,我们为自己购买了这样做的可选性。
第二是在这种速度下的质量,这是五年前我们最怀疑的部分。人工智能驱动的分诊和预测性缺陷分析,我们在大约1400个案例中运行,以专注于最高风险旅程的测试,这意味着我们上线时零安全缺陷和零高严重性缺陷,桑吉夫刚才也提到了。快速行动和安全行动之间的旧权衡正在我们面前被重新谈判,所以这是第二点。
第三是人工智能驱动的可访问性测试
,团队将其视为关键而非可选的机会。在医疗保健领域,最需要联系我们的人往往是我们设计不佳的界面成为真正障碍的人,因此能够系统性地大规模测试这一点对我们来说也是一项真正的进步。
梅根,您提到了前景。如果我不提代理式人工智能,那将是失职。从支持任务的人工智能转向在关键决策点通过适当治理和人工监督端到端完成结果的人工智能。这个项目向我们展示的是,约束不再是模型。而是您的平台、数据、流程是否足够现代化,让人工智能能够安全地行动,这正是这项工作现在重要的原因。桑吉夫也提到了底层架构。负责任的人工智能是优势的来源,而不是合规性工作,我会这么说。在健康领域,如果人们不信任您如何使用他们的信息,您构建的其他一切都不重要。我们不是为了拥有现代技术而现代化。我们现代化是为了赢得做下一件事的权利,并在几周而不是几年内完成。
梅根:完全正确。现在您有了这些基础,就像您说的,所有这些机会都打开了。太棒了。桑吉夫,最后,随着公司完成这些迁移,您看到了哪些类型的创新和好处,您预计未来五年会怎样?
桑吉夫:当然。再次,好问题,梅根。原因是即使在今天,这些迁移的方式也没有统一性。正如我之前提到的,在简单地将现有代码库提升并转移到新平台、一对一替换的情况下,好处通常有限。在我们应用第一性原理、思考重新构想、重新架构和重构系统以建立更灵活系统基础的地方,规则不被束缚在架构中,而是以能够更快纳入变更、实时实现个性化、上市时间成倍改善的方式管理。这才是我们真正看到更多好处的地方。
以保柏为例,这是一个非常明显的阶段性变化,无论是在客户体验方面,还是在团队现在实际交付的速度方面。我认为应用评分显著上升。客户体验得到了改善。即使是简单的事情,比如登录成功率,也显著提高了。在工程方面,我们现在构建和发布功能的速度大约快了四倍,我们还看到近100%的客户迁移到了新平台。
现在,如果我展望未来,您提到了未来五年,我不知道五年还是四年,但至少在未来几年,我认为这将变得非常有趣,因为现代平台将成为更智能的人工智能驱动生态系统的基础,人工智能不仅仅是附加组件,而是从设计到运营都内置其中。这就是现代平台将如何演变,客户体验将变得更加个性化和预测性。甚至我们构建软件的方式也将转变,人工智能在开发过程中扮演更大的角色。
梅根:太棒了。那么,未来确实有令人兴奋的变化。非常感谢你们两位。
那是保柏健康保险的首席信息官阿西法·谢拉齐,以及印孚瑟斯澳大利亚、新西兰和东南亚地区银行、金融服务和保险、医疗保健和公共部门区域负责人、高级副总裁桑吉夫·特里帕蒂,我在英格兰布莱顿与他们进行了交谈。
这就是本期《商业实验室》的全部内容。我是您的主持人梅根·塔图姆。我是《洞察》的特约编辑,这是《麻省理工科技评论》的定制出版部门。我们于1899年在麻省理工学院成立,您可以在印刷版、网络版以及每年世界各地的活动中找到我们。有关我们和节目的更多信息,请访问我们的网站technologyreview.com。
这个节目在您获取播客的任何地方都可以收听。如果您喜欢这一集,我们希望您能花点时间给我们评分和评论。《商业实验室》是《麻省理工科技评论》的作品,这一集由Giro Studios制作。非常感谢您的收听。
此内容由《麻省理工科技评论》的定制内容部门《洞察》制作,而非其编辑人员。它由人类研究和撰写,任何可能使用的人工智能工具仅限于在人类监督下的制作过程。
继续阅读
最受欢迎
一个根本性缺陷使大型语言模型极易受到攻击
这使得很容易诱骗它们做不该做的事情,例如告诉您如何破坏飞机的导航系统。
作者
威尔·道格拉斯·天堂档案页
Anthropic发现了一个隐藏空间,Claude在其中思考概念
一项新技术使该公司能够比以往任何时候都更深入地探究大型语言模型的奇怪运作方式。
作者
威尔·道格拉斯·天堂档案页
欧洲生育组织表示,精子捐赠者需要限制
一些由捐赠者孕育的人发现了数百个兄弟姐妹。国际捐赠上限可能有助于防止这种情况。
作者
杰西卡·哈姆泽卢档案页
人工智能在招聘时比人类更容易形成偏见
人工智能不仅从训练中学习刻板印象。它还可以编造新的刻板印象。
作者
米歇尔·金档案页
保持联系
插图由罗斯·王绘制
获取来自
《麻省理工科技评论》的最新更新
发现特别优惠、热门故事、
即将举行的活动等。
查看原文(中文正文为 AI 翻译)
Sponsored
In partnership withInfosys
For years, legacy technology has been a problem companies knew they needed to solve, but one they often struggled to tackle. The cost, complexity, and risk of replacing business-critical systems could make modernization feel like a disruption to manage instead of an opportunity to pursue. But with the rise in customer expectations and the changes AI brought to the economics of software development, that calculation is changing. Bupa’s modernization of its My Bupa mobile application offers a case study in what becomes possible when a legacy migration is treated as a business transformation rather than a technology rewrite.
Bupa CIO of health insurance Asifa Sherazi describes the risks of waiting for legacy systems to become an emergency: “The end-of-life technology is a risk that compounds quietly, and then arrives all at once.” For Bupa, moving its application from Xamarin to native Swift and Kotlin improved the app rating from 3.7 to 4.7, while the user-perceived crash rate fell by nearly 24 percentage points on Android and eight points on iOS. “What they’ll notice is that when they need us, often at a stressful moment, it just simply works,” Sherazi says.
Sanjeev Tripathi, senior vice president and region head of BFSI, healthcare, and public sector for Australia, New Zealand, and Southeast Asia at Infosys, contends that AI is helping change the equation. “The emergence of AI is fundamentally shifting the economics of modernization,” he says, reducing the effort, risk, and time traditionally associated with these programs. At Bupa, combining AI-assisted reverse engineering with forward engineering helped deliver the transformation in approximately 60% less time than would have been possible in the pre-AI era.
Sherazi and Tripathi also highlight the human dimension of modernization: preserving institutional knowledge, giving teams capacity to adapt, and creating an environment where employees can surface problems early.
Looking ahead, both experts see modernized platforms as foundations for more personalized, predictive and AI-driven experiences. The payoff of modernization may be less about replacing aging technology and more about building the flexibility needed for whatever comes next.
“Modern platforms will become the base for far more intelligent AI-driven ecosystems, where AI is not just an add-on, but it is built into everything from design to operations. That's how the modern platforms will evolve, and the customer experiences will become far more personalized and predictive,” says Tripathi. For Sherazi, that shift is already changing the questions organizations can ask: “It used to be, can our platform support that? Now, it’s: is that the right thing to do for our customers?”
This episode of Business Lab is produced in partnership with Infosys.
Full Transcript:
Megan Tatum: From MIT Technology Review, I'm Megan Tatum, and this is Business Lab, the show that helps business leaders make sense of new technologies coming out of the lab and into the marketplace.
Our topic today is legacy modernization. Companies across industries continue to struggle to bring AI modernization to legacy technology stacks, increasing the risk of losing vendor support, degraded customer experience, and limited capacity for innovation.
Two words for you: future-ready foundation.
My guests are Asifa Sherazi, who is CIO of health insurance at Bupa, and Sanjeev Tripathi, who is senior vice president, region head of BFSI, healthcare, and public sector for Australia, New Zealand, and Southeast Asia at Infosys.
This podcast is produced in association with Infosys.
Welcome, Asifa and Sanjeev.
Asifa Sherazi: Thank you, Megan. Delighted to be here.
Sanjeev Tripathi: Thanks, Megan. Wonderful to be here. And good talking to you again, Asifa.
Megan: Thank you both so much for being here. Asifa, if I could start with you just to set the context for our conversation. There are seven million healthcare customers across the Asia-Pacific. Could you tell us a bit more about Bupa and the challenges it's faced in its modernization plan?
Asifa: Yes, absolutely. Let me start with something about Bupa that shapes everything we do. We are a global healthcare organization. Think hospitals, clinics, dental, age care, digital health, alongside our insurance business. We reinvest back into the organization, so into our services, our capability, our teams, and our outcomes that we deliver for our customers. In Asia-Pacific, we serve around, as you said, seven million customers across health insurance and health services, individuals, families, corporate clients, patients. Our purpose, helping people live longer, healthier, happier lives is more than just a statement. It actually shapes our strategy, guides our investment decisions, and influences the choices our teams make every day.
Now, for most of our health insurance members, the day-to-day digital relationship with Bupa begins through My Bupa, our self-service platform. It's the front door for managing cover, updating policy details, submitting claims, checking entitlements. Alongside of it, Blua plays a complimentary role. Where My Bupa helps members manage their cover, Blua helps them manage their health, digital healthcare services, clinical support, preventative health. And together, they let us move beyond transactional interactions towards more personalized, proactive care.
Here was our challenge. Our mobile app, My Bupa, was built on Xamarin, and Microsoft support for it ended sometime in 2024. We had extended support in place, so our customers remained protected throughout, but we were clear-eyed that this was a bridge, not a destination. The runway was finite, and it was shortening for us. We made the decision to modernize from a position of stability proactively for the long-term safety and experiences of our customer rather than waiting until circumstances forced our hand, because the platform carrying our most important customer relationship was in effect standing still while the world around it was moving.
Megan: Right. So you decided to act really proactively in that sense. And so, Asifa, what are some of the risks then of sticking with end-of-life technologies, and how will moving away from legacy technologies help you improve the customer experience?
Asifa: Yeah. Look, the end-of-life technology is a risk that compounds quietly, and then arrives all at once. We saw it in three ways. The first is security and compliance. Once a technology is out of vendor support, the flow of security updates and fixes changes fundamentally. In our case, we put extended support in place as a bridge so our customers stayed protected. But extended support buys you time, it doesn't buy you a future. In healthcare, we hold some of the most sensitive information a person will ever share with an organization. That isn't data to us, it's trust. And trust is extraordinarily expensive to rebuild. We weren't prepared to run that risk on a shortening runway.
The second is losing control of your own roadmap. How I'd explain that is iOS and Android don't stand still. Every operating system release, every change to app store requirements becomes something that you react to rather than plan for. As each one slows you down a little further, over time, that opens a widening gap between what customers expect and what you can actually give them. We're all customers. We don't benchmark a health insurer against other health insurers. We benchmark against whatever app we used last.
And the third way was, and this is one we'd flag for peers, is the shrinking talent pool. Xamarin is legacy technology, and the engineering expertise available for it is limited. You end up with a critical customer platform supported by a narrowing group of specialists. That's a workforce risk wearing a technology costume. We partnered with Infosys and we migrated the entire application estate from Xamarin to fully native Swift and Kotlin, and the customer outcomes are why we're comfortable talking about this today. Our app rating moved from 3.7 to 4.7. Some of the stats that I'd love to share are that the user-perceived crash rate fell by nearly 24 percentage points on Android and eight points on iOS. The Android login success per visit doubled back up to 77%, and that's one the team that is most proud of, because a login failure isn't a technical event. It's a person who wanted to check their cover and they couldn't.
The team achieved 100% feature parity in a single release, and 90% of our active customer base moved to a new version, and they've, I think, downloaded nearly 1.8 million unique downloads. From our customers' perspective, customers will never think about any of this as a technology change, and they shouldn't have to either. What they'll notice is that when they need us, often at a stressful moment, it just simply works, and that's the outcome we were really after.
Megan: Those are some really striking results and statistics that you've shared there on the success of the migration. I mean, Sanjeev, could you talk a bit about why modernizing legacy technologies is so critical at this time, and how Infosys has approached that transformation journey with Bupa?
Sanjeev: Sure, Megan. To be honest, legacy modernization initiatives are not new, and there has always been a strong desire to drive modernization across the entire technology landscape. And Asifa covered all the points that I was going to cover about the risks that have been there. But I'll reiterate, the reality is the industry has been held back by the cost complexity, and also the risks that have been associated with any legacy modernization initiative that has been undertaken historically.
As Asifa mentioned, customer expectations of what was acceptable five, 10 years back are simply not acceptable anymore. The customers today expect a seamless, intuitive, responsive interaction across every channel. And Asifa also covered the growing challenges around security, resilience, talent availability, and so on. Finding talent on legacy technology is extremely, extremely difficult, and that introduces risk in every organization and in every legacy platform, most of which are actually business-critical platforms as well. Security vulnerabilities are getting increasingly difficult to manage, and as I mentioned, finding deep expertise in older technologies is very, very difficult now.
So what has changed? What has changed is that we now have new tools that are available to us to address these challenges. The emergence of AI is fundamentally shifting the economics of modernization, and it's doing that by helping organizations to reduce the effort, risk, and also the time that is traditionally taken for programs like these, and that is why we believe that the time is now for legacy modernization. In fact, in Infosys, we have six strategic value pools that we have identified in our AI-first value framework, which is publicly available, and legacy modernization is one of these six value pools. And in the market, we are seeing very strong interest across our client base, and they recognize that the opportunity to unlock both technical and business value is now.
With Bupa in particular, we approached the journey as a business transformation rather than simply a technology rewrite, and our approach had two key phases. One is reverse engineering, and then forward engineering. Let me just quickly cover what these two are.
Reverse engineering, what we did is we extracted and we understood the rules, the processes, and the logic within the legacy environment, and that's a standard approach we took, we take in any legacy modernization program. What that does is it allows us to preserve the critical business functionality, but at the same time, it avoids the risks that often come with large-scale migration programs.
The second aspect is forward engineering, where we re-architected the solution to enable a reimagined customer experience. The objective is not just a feature-by-feature migration or ensuring feature parity, which is important, but it is even more important that since we're investing this kind of money to create a modern platform that is scalable, maintainable, and is also capable for future innovation, and that's what Asifa mentioned about you need to be in control of your own roadmap. You have to build a platform which is capable of supporting future innovation as well. We essentially ensured nothing was lost in translation, and we significantly improved the platform stability and long-term maintainability. And some of the metrics that Asifa mentioned reflects the meaningful improvement in customer experience as well.
Finally, just one more point before I close this question is the time to market. I spoke about the time is now, and because we've got the power of the tools that are available now. What AI allowed us is to accelerate the transformation dramatically. What would have traditionally been a long and complex modernization, was delivered in approximately 60% less time than what would have happened in pre-AI era, and that is the real story.
Megan: So AI in this context is a real enabler in terms of the economics and the speed and all of those things you're talking about. If I could come back to you, Asifa, as much as modernization is a technology challenge, there is the human component as well, and I wondered if you could talk about how you prepared employees for these new technologies, and what challenges and solutions you faced on that front as well?
Asifa: The human side of it is what I'm really passionate about. Technology was only half the challenge. The real work was helping people move from what they knew to what was possible. Modernization isn't just about replacing systems, it's about giving teams the confidence, the capability, the clarity to embrace a different future, and that's what determines whether change actually succeeds.
From that experience, there were three human challenges that stood out for us. The first one was scarcity of expertise on both sides of the transition, and like we said before, Xamarin is a legacy app. We were moving away from a legacy technology, supported by a rapidly shrinking specialist talent pool, and modernizing onto two native platforms. Documentation of that existing environment was limited. Much of the operational knowledge sat in individual experience and in the code base itself, and that created a real dependency on a small number of people. And for the team, it was a confronting reality and a powerful reminder that modernization isn't just about technology imperative, it's actually a resilience one.
What changed the dynamic was using AI to do the archeology. As Sanjeev mentioned, Infosys applied AI-assisted reverse engineering to harvest the legacy Xamarin code and extract the flows, the rules, the business logic, and generate native-ready user stories and acceptance criteria from it. The team did a lot of work. They mapped hundreds, I think nearly 1,500 regression scenarios to native epics, and that way, parity critical journeys were preserved by design rather than by memory. The human effect was just as important. Knowledge stopped living with a handful of individuals and became shared across the team, and our people could spend less energy holding institutional memory and more on designing and improving. So that was the first challenge.
The second challenge, Megan, was capacity and not willingness. Our business analysts were fully committed to ongoing feature delivery. And this is a live customer-facing app, and you cannot pause improving the customer experience while you rebuild underneath it. AI-driven discovery and documentation removed almost an estimated of 400 hours of manual BA effort, and that's not a headcount story, that's actually people not being asked to do two full-time jobs at once.
The third challenge that stood out was pace. Our original internal estimate was around 18 months, and thanks to Sanjeev and the team, almost like a one-team approach of how do we tackle this, the team delivered it in seven, and that's exhilarating.
t's also demanding, and both things need saying out loud. We mobilized cross-functional squads across engineering, architecture, testing, release, because managing parallel environments while protecting BAU commitments is such an emotional load as well as a logistical one. We leaned in hard alongside the team, being present rather than reporting from a distance, regular check-ins, genuinely listening to concerns, unblocking things quickly so people weren't sitting waiting on a decision. And Megan, one thing I'll say is when you're compressing 18 months to seven, the most useful thing leadership can do is remove the friction in front of someone else and get out of their way.
But the thing that made the biggest difference was surprisingly simple, actually. We built a visual depiction of the transformation journey, and we updated it every month so the team could actually see how far they've come. Because when you deepen migration of this scale, it's really easy to only see what's left to be done, and being able to look back at the ground that's already been covered gave people real intent and real momentum. And genuinely, it was exhilarating to watch. Watching the team's pride became their fuel.
Megan: I love that idea of it being exhilarating, but exhausting. I think that's a great description.
Asifa: Yeah. And the leadership lesson for all of us was just simpler than any of it. Programs like this have hard weeks, there's going to be incidents, delay, difficult conversations. And Sanjeev, you and I have had those conversations many times. The job of leadership in those moments is to absorb the ambiguity rather than transmit anxiety, because if people feel safe telling you bad news early, there's almost nothing you can't fix. I say this plainly because it's the truest thing about the whole program. I am so incredibly proud of this team, because what they achieved in seven months, while continuing to serve customers every single day without disruption, was genuinely remarkable. But what I'm really proud of isn't the speed and it isn't the engineering, it's that the team never lost sight of who it was for, so every decision that we were making, and they came back, it just came back to the person at the other end of the app.
Megan: It sounds like you did an incredible job focusing on that people element just as much as the technology, which is so important. And Sanjeev, we've heard some of the incredible results Bupa has had with this, but more broadly, I suppose, looking across modernization use cases, where do you find that companies see the most ROI, and what advice do you have for leaders who need to focus on transformation at that legacy level?
Sanjeev: Thanks, Megan. That's a very important and actually a very good question, because what we see is modernization ROI is sometimes viewed too narrowly through just a technology lens, and as Asifa mentioned, it is broader than just technology. Legacy modernization has aspects associated with business implications as well, so I'll just cover that very quickly.
There are two dimensions, as I mentioned. One is technical ROI or technology-related ROI, and second is business ROI. On the technical side, and as you heard from Asifa as well, the biggest benefits come from faster time to market, platform stability and resilience, of course, and a lot of times, in fact, almost in all the cases, lower operating costs, and that is one of the aspects associated with some of the legacy modernization programs.
Besides this, access to broader, more readily available talent pool, and security management, and ensuring that the platforms are secure and free from, as much as possible, free from vulnerabilities in the current environment. At the same time, making it easier to innovate, releases become faster so that the feature delivery into the market becomes faster, and also able to respond to any new technology innovation that comes into play. But this is only on the technology side.
On the business side, however, the returns are often reflected in customer outcomes, and what we typically see are improvements in measures such as net promoter score, and in this case, for example, application ratings that you see on the app store. Both of which are actually very strong indicators of customer satisfaction and digital experience quality. I think it is important for us to cover, look at the ROI from both technology, but more importantly, from a business perspective.
The second part of your question was about what would be my advice to leaders, and I think Asifa covered it very well, where she mentioned that the one-team approach, the providing safe environment to the team to be able to say what is going well, but also what is not going well, and keeping your eye on the end outcome. I think those are very important things. But I would also like to add that don't treat modernization as a technology initiative. It is a unique opportunity for us to rethink the business platform itself, and rather than pursuing a like-to-like migration, use the investment that you're making to improve customer experience, simplify processes, and re-architect for capabilities such as real-time personalization and data-driven decision-making. The greatest returns come when technology transformation is directly linked to business outcomes.
And finally, and this is something that I have seen from personal experience multiple times, is you have to think from first principles. AI does not replace good engineering practices. It enables organizations to execute those practices faster, and it enables it faster, but also more consistently and at greater scale. The foundations of good architecture, sound engineering, and clear business objectives will continue to remain important, and in fact, their importance is going to increase as we progress. That, I think, is what I would say anybody embarking on a legacy modernization program should be focused on.
Megan: I love the idea that this is not just about migration. This a chance, as you say, to reimagine what you can deliver and what's possible. Fantastic. Let's close with a forward look. Asifa, what innovation are you looking forward to that wouldn't have been possible before this, and what do you see on the horizon?
Asifa: There's definitely lots of things on the horizon. But what excites us most isn't specific technology, it's that the question in our conversations has changed. It used to be, can our platform support that? Now, it’s is that the right thing to do for our customers? And that's a profound shift.
There's three things, Megan, that genuinely weren't possible before, and we've touched on this a little bit, and Sanjeev's touched on it as well. This first is speed as a permanent capability. Since launch, Android and iOS, the team has shipped multiple rapid-fire releases, including our migration to a new payment gateway. Builds are now completing four times faster, codes are reaching to testers in about an hour, and we've reduced our code base by 30%, and our application footprint's reduced 18% as well. A simpler estate isn't an aesthetic preference anymore, it's what makes the next change cheap, and we've bought ourselves optionality to do that.
The second is quality at that speed, which is the part we've been most skeptical about five years ago. AI-driven triage and predictive defect analysis, we ran it across nearly 1,400 cases to focus on testing on the highest risk journeys, which meant we went live with zero security defects and zero high severity defects, and Sanjeev mentioned that just before. The old trade-off between moving fast and moving safely is being renegotiated right in front of us, so that's the second point.
The third one is AI-driven accessibility testing, which the teams treated as a critical rather than an optional opportunity. In healthcare, people who most need to reach us are very often the people whom our poorly designed interface is a genuine barrier, and so being able to test that systematically at scale was a real advance for us as well.
And Megan, you mentioned on the horizon. It'll be remiss of me not to take the name of agentic AI. The shift from AI that supports a task to AI that completes an outcome end-to-end with proper governance, human oversight at the key decision points. What this program showed us is that the constraint is no longer the models. It's whether your platforms, data, processes are modern enough to let AI act safely, which is precisely why this work mattered now. Sanjeev alluded to it as well about that underlying architecture. Responsible AI as a source of advantage, not a compliance exercise, I would say. In health, if people don't trust how you're using their information, nothing else you build matters. We didn't modernize to have modern technology. We modernized to earn the right to do the next thing, and to do it in weeks rather than years.
Megan: Absolutely. And now you have those foundations in place, like you say, all of these opportunities open up. Fantastic. And Sanjeev, just finally, as companies complete these migrations, what kinds of innovations and benefits are you seeing, and what do you expect in the next five years?
Sanjeev: Sure. Again, good question, Megan. The reason is there is no uniformity on how these migrations are being done even today. As I mentioned earlier, so where there is simple lift and shift of existing code base onto a new platform, a like-to-like replacement, the benefits generally tend to be limited. Where we apply first principles, thinking about re-imagining, re-architecting, and refactoring the system to establish foundations for a far more flexible system, where rules are not boxed into the architecture, but are managed in a way that changes can be incorporated faster, personalization can be achieved in real time, and time to market improves multifold. That's where we are really seeing far more benefits coming through.
And to take the example of Bupa, it is a pretty clear step change, both in terms of customer experience and how fast teams can actually deliver now. I think the app ratings have gone up significantly. The customer experience has improved. Even simple things, such as login success rate, has improved quite significantly. And on the engineering side, we are now building and releasing features roughly about four times faster, and we are also seeing the migration of nearly 100% of the customers onto the new platform.
Now, if I look ahead over the next, you mentioned about next five years, I don't know about five years, four years, but over the next few years at least, I think it is going to get very interesting, because modern platforms will become the base for far more intelligent AI-driven ecosystems, where AI is not just an add-on, but it is built into everything from design to operations. That's how the modern platforms will evolve, and the customer experiences will become far more personalized and predictive. And even the way we build software will shift, with AI playing a much bigger role in the development process itself.
Megan: Fantastic. Really exciting changes on the horizon then. Thank you both so much.
That was Asifa Sherazi, who is the CIO of health insurance at Bupa, and Sanjeev Tripathi, senior vice president, region head of BFSI, healthcare, and public Sector for Australia, New Zealand, and Southeast Asia at Infosys, whom I spoke with from Brighton in England.
That's it for this episode of Business Lab. I'm your host, Megan Tatum. I'm a contributing editor at Insights, the custom publishing division of MIT Technology Review. We were founded in 1899 at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and you can find us in print, on the web, and at events each year around the world. For more information about us and the show, please check out our website at technologyreview.com.
This show is available wherever you get your podcasts. And if you enjoyed this episode, we hope you'll take a moment to rate and review us. Business Lab is a production of MIT Technology Review, and this episode was produced by Giro Studios. Thank you so much for listening.
This content was produced by Insights, MIT Technology Review’s custom content arm, not its editorial staff. It was researched and written by humans, with any AI tools that may have been used limited to production processes under human oversight.
Keep Reading
Most Popular
A fundamental flaw leaves LLMs strikingly vulnerable to attack
It makes it easy to trick them into doing things they shouldn’t, such as telling you how to sabotage an aircraft’s navigation system.
By
Will Douglas Heavenarchive page
Anthropic found a hidden space where Claude puzzles over concepts
A new technique has let the company probe deeper than ever into the weird workings of an LLM.
By
Will Douglas Heavenarchive page
Sperm donors need limits, says a European fertility group
Some donor-conceived people are finding hundreds of siblings. An international cap on donations could help prevent that.
By
Jessica Hamzelouarchive page
AI is more likely than humans to form biases when hiring
AI doesn’t just learn stereotypes from its training. It can cook up new ones, too.
By
Michelle Kimarchive page
Stay connected
Illustration by Rose Wong
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories,
upcoming events, and more.