智能体
x.com ·
@Addy Osmani (@addyosmani)
Addy Osmani分享AI辅助代码审查实践：多Agent初筛+人工把关
Addy Osmani介绍其代码审查流程：每个PR先由多Agent初筛，查找并验证bug、按严重性排序、建议修复；低风险改动可跳过深度人工审查，核心路径仍需人工签核，强调可恢复性。
AI推荐理由 Addy Osmani分享AI辅助代码审查的实践方法，具体且实用，对开发者有直接参考价值，来源可信。
75
浏览 42,197
点赞 404
评论 31
转发 24
正文
如今我如何进行代码审查：代码越多 = 人工审查越有选择性，即不阅读所有代码。
1. 每个PR都经过多代理首轮审查。它应能发现错误、验证错误、按严重程度排序、提出修复建议。对于重要事项，批准仍由人工决定。
2. 在不太敏感的代码上，影响范围小的更改（通常有很多！）在审查干净后可以跳过深度人工审查。这有助于管理PR的激增。
3. 核心/敏感路径仍需要负责人和人工签字。这是您花费时间的地方：验证、约束，并赢得对代理可安全覆盖范围的信任。您希望保持可恢复性。
代理进行首轮审查，人工覆盖影响范围。
来自@GergelyOrosz的好问题！
查看原文（中文正文为 AI 翻译）
How I do code reviews these days: more code = more selective human review i.e. don't read all the code.
1. Every PR gets a multi-agent first pass. It should find bugs, verify them, rank by severity, suggest fixes. Approval stays a human call on anything that matters.
2. Low blast radius changes on less sensitive code (there's often a lot!) can skip a deep human review once that review is clean. This helps keep the explosion of PRs manageable.
3. Core / sensitive paths still need an owner and human sign-off. That's where you spend time: verification, constraints and earning trust in what the agents can safely cover. You want to keep recoverability.
Agents do the first pass and humans cover blast radius.
Great question from @GergelyOrosz!