智能体
x.com ·
@Arena.ai (@arena)
Image-to-WebDev Arena 更新：Claude Opus 5.5 (Max) 以 1749 分登顶
LMArena 的 Image-to-WebDev Arena 榜单更新显示，Anthropic 的 Claude Opus 5.5 (Max) 以 1749 分排名第一，Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh) 以 1740 分紧随其后，两者均进入 Pareto 前沿。价格方面，Opus 5.5 混合输入/输出 token 价格为 $16/M，比第三名 GPT-6 Astra 的 $40/M 低 60%；Sonnet 5.5 为 $8/M，比 Opus 低 50%，且排名高于 GPT-6 Astra。该 Arena 评估模型从图像和截图生成网站的能力，以及涉及多步推理和工具调用的 agentic 编码工作流。
AI推荐理由 LMArena 官方账号发布的 Image-to-WebDev Arena 榜单更新，给出了具体分数（Opus 5.5 Max 1749 分、Sonnet 5.5 xHigh 1740 分）和价格对比（$16/M、$8/M 对 GPT-6 Astra $40/M），属于可核验的排行榜数据，对关注模型选型与性价比的开发者有参考价值。但内容为榜单转述，未提供评测方法细节、样本量或独立复现证据，且涉及尚未广泛确认的模型版本命名，需保留不确定性；互动量仅作传播信号，不计入质量评分。
62
浏览 30,980
点赞 457
评论 56
转发 25
正文
Image-to-WebDev Arena update: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max) by @AnthropicAI takes the #1 spot with 1749 pts, with Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh) just 9 pts behind at #2 with 1740 pts!
Both models also landed on the Pareto frontier! See their positioning on the visual in thread.
- #1-ranked Claude Opus 5.5 (Max) has a blended input/output token price of $16/M. This is 60% lower than #3-ranked GPT-6 Astra at $40/M.
- #2-ranked Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh) costs $8/M, 50% less than Opus for a 9-point score gap. It also ranks one place above GPT-6 Astra (#3) while costing 80% less.
Stay tuned to see where Claude Haiku 5.5 lands in the Image-to-WebDev Arena!
The Image-to-WebDev Arena ranks AI models on their ability to generate websites from images and screenshots, alongside agentic coding workflows involving multi-step reasoning and tool use.