最新资讯
dev.to 在信任 AI 生成的测试用例前,如何逐条复核 unite.ai Franklin Templeton 构建 AI 研究工作流以揭示风险 techxplore.com AI 助力寻找更优的钛合金 3D 打印工艺参数 engadget.com Perplexity 推出“teammates”日常工作任务 AI agent computerworld.com 别提数据中心:OpenAI 改称“compute campuses” theguardian.com 俄美试图阻止就自主武器制定具有约束力的规则 bloomberg.com Nvidia 加强东南亚芯片追踪以打击走私 thestack.technology 模型路由需求升温,Agent Router 推出开源替代方案 www.youtube.com Google DeepMind 的 Philipp Schmid:AI 同事需要具备的七个要素 unite.ai Cashfree 为 AI Agent 的托管结账加入 WebMCP 工具 dev.to 我们在 DolphinBench 上测试记忆检索:纯关键词搜索暴露了自身回归 dev.to 别再把 Agent 写成 while 循环,把它建模为状态机
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

MME-Safety:面向多模态大语言模型安全评估的细粒度基准

原文 我的收藏

该论文提出 MME-Safety,一个经严格验证的多模态大模型安全评测基准,采用四维标注体系对风险场景、危害严重度和模态特定隐蔽等级进行分类,并引入分层评估框架,考察基础响应可靠性、实际风险暴露与防御行为结构完整性。作者对 17 个当前先进 MLLM 进行零样本评测,系统分析跨模态输入配置及 Chain-of-Thought 推理带来的安全影响,指出多模态领域亟需具备推理感知能力的安全对齐。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 正式论文(v2,2026-09-22 修订),来源可信、信息密度高。提出 MME-Safety 多模态大模型安全评测基准,含四维标注(风险场景、危害严重度、模态特定隐蔽等级)与分层评估框架,并对 17 个 MLLM 做零样本评测,还分析了跨模态输入配置与 CoT 推理的安全影响。局限:摘要未给出具体评测数值与基准规模,实际效果需看全文;属评测基准类工作,对安全对齐与多模态落地有直接参考价值。

78

正文

Computer Science > Computation and Language arXiv:2609.20850 (cs) [Submitted on 8 Aug 2026 (v1), last revised 22 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:MME-Safety: A Fine-grained Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of MLLMs Authors:Yilian Shi, Yueming Lyu, Haoxiang Tan, Linzhuang Zou, Qihao Wang, Guihua Yu, Chenyang Si, Caifeng Shan View a PDF of the paper titled MME-Safety: A Fine-grained Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of MLLMs, by Yilian Shi and 7 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) show remarkable advancements, their cross-modal capabilities introduce complex vulnerabilities that easily bypass unimodal filters. Existing benchmarks lack fine-grained intent-related annotations and rely on unidimensional metrics, hindering comprehensive robustness evaluation. To address this, we propose MME-Safety, a rigorously verified benchmark featuring a unique four-dimensional annotation schema that categorizes risk scenarios, harm severity, and modality-specific stealth levels. Furthermore, we introduce a hierarchical evaluation framework to assess fundamental response reliability, actual risk exposure, and the structural integrity of defensive behaviors. Extensive zero-shot evaluations across 17 state-of-the-art MLLMs provide a comprehensive safety profile of current multimodal systems. Our analysis systematically investigates cross-modal input configurations and uncovers safety implications associated with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. These multifaceted findings underscore the urgent need for robust, reasoning-aware safety alignment in the multimodal landscape. Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) Cite as: arXiv:2609.20850 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2609.20850v2 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.20850 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Yilian Shi [view email] [v1] Sat, 8 Aug 2026 02:49:39 UTC (23,806 KB) [v2] Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:08:57 UTC (23,806 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled MME-Safety: A Fine-grained Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of MLLMs, by Yilian Shi and 7 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-09 Change to browse by: cs cs.CV References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容